Why did you choose this approach over other RE investment strategies?
Have you run into issues in existing buildings that would make for a step change in yield if you were to have a purpose built structure?Stan Crowch said:
A search for yield and a belief that a lack of affordable workforce housing is a massive issue across this country. I think the largest real estate private equity companies in the world will invest heavily in this space over the coming years. If this works the end game would be to raise a fund to put together a multi-state portfolio of these purchased on comps (probably some new builds as well specially designed for co-living) and then sell based on a cap rate.
I assume then these are in Odessa, border areas, and deep within immigrant heavy communities within cities that aren't NIMBYs.Stan Crowch said:
Would rather not get too detailed as to location on a public forum but these are all in Texas.
Stan Crowch said:
We are working on these with a very well-capitalized family office. No lenders involved.
This is certainly accurate and they are comfortable with it. This investment represents a tiny part of their portfolio and a proof of concept. I think we have determined conclusively that there is a market for this product. Now it's about determining what yield premium over traditional SFR makes this undertaking a worthwhile endeavor and whether or not we can we achieve it reliably. There is still a lot to be learned and nothing about this is easy or hands-off.Malibu2 said:Stan Crowch said:
We are working on these with a very well-capitalized family office. No lenders involved.
How are they going to get their return then? I think this is an excellent idea that is probably a pioneer ahead of underwriting. The exit piece seems a little bit hard because presumably your end buyer is going to need to take out a note or you'll need to refi to pull out equity and I don't know who is offering that product. I suppose if your family office is happy to hold forever with no debt then that's that, but as somebody who sees the value in this from the private equity eye I'd love to think through the financing of this. Reading this thread was a bit of a lightbulb moment for me as the business model seems like a slam dunk.
When I first move to Austin the housing market was extremely tight and apartments were way too expensive so I found a boarding house and ended up staying there for 17 years, saved a ton of money but the roomies were something else. The initial house was a ranch house built in the 50's, typical 3 bedroom and one bath but she had built two rooms at the back of the house with a separate shower and then she bought two shacks from Lowes and sandwiched a bathroom between them and those two bedrooms were not attached to the house at all, freestanding in the backyard. Maximum capacity was 7 people but two of them were living in the back yard with kitchen privileges along with use of the washing machine and dryer set up outside under the carport.Stan Crowch said:
We have all walks of life. Young tech kids who want the lowest overhead possible, people going through life transitions, divorce, etc. We have refinery workers, fast-food workers, gig economy people, etc. We have people here temporarily for work. One of our homes is all women and they have become friends and a support system for each other and just love living together. It's a very wide spectrum.
Apologies for derailing this thread, my reply has nothing to do with real estate so I'm removing it.Sea Speed said:
You lived in a boarding house for SEVENTEEN YEARS? Are you celibate?
MAS444 said:
I wish your replies weren't deleted. I'm fascinated.
Sea Speed said:
You lived in a boarding house for SEVENTEEN YEARS? Are you celibate?