Real Estate
Sponsored by

New fee and higher cost because you keep a good credit score.

3,142 Views | 18 Replies | Last: 2 yr ago by Jay@AgsReward.com
Furlock Bones
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
.GOV feels there is just a bit more juice to squeeze out of the middle class. They are grinding the rind at this point.


https://nypost.com/2023/04/16/how-the-us-is-subsidizing-high-risk-homebuyers-at-the-cost-of-those-with-good-credit/amp/
Furlock Bones
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This may have been discussed before. But I figured it's happening now so people here won't be surprised.
CS78
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Fighting the systemic racism of credit scores. Or good old fashion wealth redistribution. Pretty much the same thing.
Furlock Bones
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
CS78 said:

Fighting the systemic racism of credit scores. Or good old fashion wealth redistribution. Pretty much the same thing.


It's not wealthy people that this hurts. It directly hurts the middle class. We are constantly under attack financially.
Martin Q. Blank
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Furlock Bones said:

This may have been discussed before. But I figured it's happening now so people here won't be surprised.
https://texags.com/forums/59/topics/3357595
NoahAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Hopefully there are democrat voters on this board that will rethink their voting decisions.

But I doubt it.
GAC06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Encouraging high risk borrowing seems like sound economic policy, and taking from responsible people who make good decisions is only fair.
NoahAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GAC06 said:

Encouraging high risk borrowing seems like sound economic policy, and taking from responsible people who make good decisions is only fair.
I mean, what's the worst that can happen? It's not like we've ever tried to give easy home loans to people who couldn't afford them and then had to default at a scale that had never been seen.

oh, wait.
Jay@AgsReward.com
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sponsor
AG
Without the government implied guarantee on ALL conventional loans our mortgage market would look a lot more like the rest of the world. That is to say a lot less fixed mortgages and virtually no 30 year fixed, with 20% down more or less as the min. So the implied gov subsidy is WHY these changes can even be made. So, if you have a Fannie/Freddie mortgage the terms are as good as they are it is because it was backed by the Gov.

And I am not sure why this is making the news now, as linked on this thread this was announced in Jan and has been baked into rates since at least March.
Furlock Bones
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
nothing wrong with revisiting complete and utter BS especially when the implementation is happening next month.
Jay@AgsReward.com
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sponsor
AG
The implementation happened back in early March. It takes in effect for loans delivered to the GSE on or after May 1. But, it takes time to close a loan and then it takes time to sell the loan to the GSE so lenders had to price it a while back.
NoahAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jay@AgsReward.com said:


And I am not sure why this is making the news now, as linked on this thread this was announced in Jan and has been baked into rates since at least March.
Probably b/c many of us don't live and breathe mortgages everyday and it's not exactly a hot topic on most news/commentary programs.

This is more than just gov't-backed mortgages. It is literal wealth redistribution.

I can see how certain professions will benefit from this, but it's a big Eff You to lots of people for being responsible.
Jay@AgsReward.com
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sponsor
AG
I am just surprised it was not news when it was announced is my point. At that point maybe a public outcry would have helped. For the record, this does NOT help my business in anyway and like I said in the previous thread linked here on this topic I am not a fan of the changes but because the timing does not make sense to me.

However, most people do not understand that the vast majority of middle class borrowers have been greatly subsidized by the government since world war 2. I think the better argument is maybe the government should not be subsidizing mortgages at all.

and there is a lot of confusion out there that some how someone with a 620 credit score is going to get a better rate then a 760 credit borrower and that could not further from the truth. The difference is a 760 borrower right now with 20% down would be looking at around 6% where a 620 would be 7.5%. The difference is just smaller now then it would have been before March.
NoahAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Fair enough. To make sure I understand, though, the 760 borrowers are going to be paying extra each month in order to subsidize those with worse credit, correct?
Jay@AgsReward.com
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sponsor
AG
Yes, in my scenario above it would be .125% in overall one time costs. or, maybe 5 basis points on a rate. However, my generally point is that IF the mortgage finance system that most of the middle class uses in this country did not have the implicit guarantee of the government then borrowing costs would be MUCH different and higher then we have now. So, anyone with a conventional (and of course FHA/VA) has benefitted greatly from that subsidy. You can disagree with how that subsidy is applied to different borrowers, and that is fair as I do not like this change either but most Americans do not understand that 30 year fixed is a uniquely American product due to government guarantee.
htxag09
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So, if I'm understanding you correctly, more like high credit score individuals are losing some of the subsidies they did get and that money is increasing subsidies of low credit score individuals?
Braxton.Sherrill
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
htxag09 said:

So, if I'm understanding you correctly, more like high credit score individuals are losing some of the subsidies they did get and that money is increasing subsidies of low credit score individuals?


Yes, the people with lower credit scores are still paying more than people with higher scores. Just not as drastic a difference as before.

197361936
How long do you want to ignore this user?
NoahAg said:

GAC06 said:

Encouraging high risk borrowing seems like sound economic policy, and taking from responsible people who make good decisions is only fair.
I mean, what's the worst that can happen? It's not like we've ever tried to give easy home loans to people who couldn't afford them and then had to default at a scale that had never been seen.

oh, wait.


You should see what's coming for VA loans...all may get appraisal waivers. Many of those are 100% loans with no down payment.

I mean what's the worst that could happen lol?...actually it isn't funny.
Jay@AgsReward.com
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sponsor
AG
A drive by appraisal and desktop appraisal is not same as appraisal waiver or no appraisal. As any experienced real estate agent can attest the antiquated VA appraisal process has been a major disadvantage to veterans getting their VA offers excepted no matter the down payment because of the time that VA appraisal often took.

If you would like to know what is in the bill: https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/7735/actions?s=1&r=55
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.