Real Estate
Sponsored by

Great Insight to the current Commercial Real Estate environment

2,899 Views | 13 Replies | Last: 2 yr ago by Red Pear Luke
Red Pear Luke
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sponsor
AG
He is the CEO of a rather large East Coast MF group with assets across the US. Great thread

jja79
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
10 year Treasury at 4.18% right now. That's 20 bps higher than last week, 30 bps higher than last month, 65 bps higher than 6 months ago. I was on a call yesterday with some supposedly plugged in secondary market types who said they think rates will not drop any the rest of this year.
NPH-
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The credit box is tightening like I have never seen. Regulators are squeezing like never before. If you are not stress testing CRE projects from both interest rate shocks and NOI value propositions, you are in for a rude awakening. The numbers don't work on legacy projects, and anyone that has tenants locked in on long-term leases needs to quickly reevaluate the terms. Are rates going to come down? Maybe -- but not for another 12-18 months in my opinion. The people really paying attention are disposing of assets and getting out.
Ol Jock 99
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'm hearing even longer. It's definitely going to be an interesting ride over the next couple years. I'm in a couple deals where mgmt has executed a full turn around, 95%+ occupied, rents higher than plan...but have variable rate debt and are CF negative. Fun times.
Red Pear Luke
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sponsor
AG
Only going to get worse. The cap strikes on those variable deals are ridiculously expensive and some lenders aren't permitting anything less than 2-5 year terms depending upon the deal.

There's been several notable MF operators of late who've had to issue capital raises because their portfolio exposure to variable rate is eating into the cash flows with the caps and the increased monthly mortgage payments.
Yesterday
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG



Well it's funnier when the gif moves.
bkag9824
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Have MF deals historically been built on shorter variable rate mortgages? Or was that a relatively recent dynamic spurred on by cheap debt with the goal of building/rehabbing, stabilizing, then exiting for significant gains?

As a lay person with no MF experience, the little info I've read makes it sound like a very risky approach to what should be a med-longer term mortgage/CF play.
Heineken-Ashi
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bkag9824 said:

Have MF deals historically been built on shorter variable rate mortgages? Or was that a relatively recent dynamic spurred on by cheap debt with the goal of building/rehabbing, stabilizing, then exiting for significant gains?

As a lay person with no MF experience, the little info I've read makes it sound like a very risky approach to what should be a med-longer term mortgage/CF play.


Every Johnny come lately with a little bit of money was able to miraculously be a multifamily expert overnight with historically cheap debt. NOI didn't even have to grow. Cap rate compression did all the work for them. And they got increasingly more bold between 2018 and 2021 with variable bridge loans and throwing money at anything they could instead of assessing the quality of the real estate. When you approach a time in history where you have to go hard on day one with hundreds of thousands of dollars merely to be able to compete for a 70's built deal in a secondary market, it's time to take a step back and watch the fireworks.

And now there's a massive gap between what buyers are willing to strike on and the expectation that sellers have. And without rates dropping, it's not going to change.
"H-A: In return for the flattery, can you reduce the size of your signature? It's the only part of your posts that don't add value. In its' place, just put "I'm an investing savant, and make no apologies for it", as oldarmy1 would do."
- I Bleed Maroon (distracted easily by signatures)
Red Pear Luke
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sponsor
AG
Adding on to what Heineken said - part of what they were doing was a 3-5 year hold period, with the hopes of cash out refinancing at some point by year 3 to return cash back to investors and get most of the hard equity out. Fixed rate debt has higher prepayment penalties that eat into the returns, so they used floating with the 1% of the UPB.

But now those Johnny's have gotten themselves into a tight pickle on the increase monthly payment, increased escrows and higher insurance premiums. But the insurance is hurting everyone.

Jay@AgsReward.com
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sponsor
AG
So true. Some of syndicators I talked to over the last 5 years it was quite obvious did not understand what in the hell they were doing much less the unsophisticated "investors" they were getting funding from. The lowest rate was ALL that mattered, not term. They simply had no fear of interest rate risk at all out of naiveite. and here we are.
Ol Jock 99
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
To be fair, no one was expecting the fastest rise in rates in US History. But it is clear a lot of folks are going to lose some serious money.
jja79
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Beginning 1-20-2021 shouldn't it have been expected that a disaster was on the horizon?
bkag9824
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
jja79 said:

Beginning 1-20-2021 shouldn't it have been expected that a disaster was on the horizon?


Exactly what I was thinking. There's seemingly a LOT of really poor decisions throughout.

I know it's nowhere the near same as subprime lending, but the seemingly absolute ****ty diligence (if it can be called as such) over the past few years seems…not great.
Red Pear Luke
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sponsor
AG
bkag9824 said:

jja79 said:

Beginning 1-20-2021 shouldn't it have been expected that a disaster was on the horizon?


Exactly what I was thinking. There's seemingly a LOT of really poor decisions throughout.

I know it's nowhere the near same as subprime lending, but the seemingly absolute ****ty diligence (if it can be called as such) over the past few years seems…not great.


I think part of it was there was a pseudo arms race for just the volume. From the investment sales side, to the debt financing side, etc. Everyone wanted a piece and if you weren't going to do the deal or had a sticking point about it - you could bet that your competition down the street wasn't going to care and would take the deal down.

But I agree - the pullback from going balls to the wall to closing the credit box was quite a site to see.
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.