YellAg2004 said:
heavily intoxtricated said:
Everyone will tell you it's better to have it in an LLC, and it is better. But if you do nothing with your LLC other than purely use it to hold this house, in practice, it's not going to help you much if you get sued.
So short answer, yes it is better, with the caveat that it's not ultimately going to matter a whole lot under your facts.
I'm going to piggy-back onto this thread since it seems OP got some direction.
We're in a similar boat (townhome wanting to make a regular rental). It's paid off, so no concern about a mortgage.
When you say "if you do nothing with your LLC...it's not going to help you much if you get sued", can you please elaborate on this or explain what you mean by "do nothing with your LLC". Also, how would it not help you if you got sued? Is that not the point of the LLC?
Disclaimer: I haven't started digging into the details on how we want to handle this rental property, but it's quickly coming up on time to put it on the market and free time to research is in extremely short supply currently.
I don't have time to go into great detail, but I speak from experience as a trial lawyer having sued many people individually and successfully held them personally liable even though they were operating through an LLC or some other business organization.
There are many theories of vicarious liability that can be used in litigation to pierce the corporate veil or otherwise hold individuals jointly and severally liable with their entities. Among these would be alter ego, joint enterprise, conspiracy (for intentional torts), agency, and several others.
Alter ego and joint enterprise would be your primary concern if you just start an LLC, buy a house, put the house in the LLC, and do absolutely nothing else (which is what many people do). In that instance, (1) you're not following any corporate formalities like holding meetings, keeping minutes, etc., (2) the entity doesn't have its own bank account, so (3) you're probably commingling funds and paying the note on the property with personal funds, (4) you have total ownership of and control over the entity, (5) the entity is probably undercapitalized, and (6) the entity has no separate office and conducts no business of its own apart from just holding your house and paying you rent.
If you and your LLC get sued for negligence, for example, it's going to be pretty easy in that instance to prove that your LLC is just your alter ego, which will result in personal liability to you if you ultimately lose. The LLC exists only on paper and does nothing but hold your house, pay you money, and otherwise do whatever you make it do to serve your personal interests. That's alter ego.
Don't get me wrong. It is better to have your house in an LLC than not. It is at least an extra hoop for a plaintiff's lawyer to jump through to get to you individually, and there is no downside. But in the situation we're talking about here, it's not going to offer a whole lot of protection.