Looking for some advice. In hindsight, what would you do differently if you had to do it again ?
jja79 said:
When I was still working we required a contingency as part 9f the budget. People balked at first but it came into play a great majority of the time.
Our bank required 10% last year, unless you could prove sufficient liquid assets to remove it from the budget/approval process.Corps_Ag12 said:jja79 said:
When I was still working we required a contingency as part 9f the budget. People balked at first but it came into play a great majority of the time.
Was this a percentage and if so, how much of the total build?
Yep. Our builder did this as well and had worked with our bank many times over the years. Two points where this happened were roofing and landscaping.jja79 said:
10% unless as another poster said there was sufficient liquidity to remove it.
We also used an independent budget review. Having closed thousands of construction loans we had a pretty good handle on what a budget should look like. For example if a line item should have been 14-16% of budget but was 9% that required a call between our construction manager and the builder for explanation and resolution. I feel like a lot of potential problems were resolved that way.