Agree. Brooks turned pro in 2012 and only has 4 PGA Tour wins outside of his 5 majors during that time frame.

Proportionally LIV has probably 6-7 golfers that could contend at any major out of maybe 15-20 golfers that qualify for majors. The Tour probably has 10-15 golfers that you could realistically see win out of maybe 50-75 golfers (Both of these examples exclude long shots that get hot for a weekend). LIV's ratio is going to be higher because they're player pool is smaller and top heavy.

The finishes from the last 2 majors show a different story top 50.

They had 7/16 finish in the top 50 last weekend which is what I was getting at. Their upper tier players are just as capable as the Tour's but their overall player pool is so much smaller that their ratio will be a lot larger.

They had 12 at the Masters and more than half were different names than the PGA.

Agree to disagree, but that doesn't match your thesis.