Why Don't The Newest US Air Force F-16s Use These High-Tech Fuel Tanks?

1,041 Views | 1 Replies | Last: 10 yr ago by jfadioustoad
Azure
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
http://foxtrotalpha.jalopnik.com/why-dont-new-u-s-air-force-f-16s-use-these-futuristic-1712746714

Fuel is the ever-present specter that looms over every pilot. It's great when you have enough of it, and terrifying when you don't. This is especially true for notoriously fuel hungry tactical fighters. Conformal Fuel Tanks (CFTs) have become an increasingly popular way to add range to existing fighter designs, such as the F-16, without making a large impact on the jet's speed and agility. Many overseas operators utilize CFTs on block 50/52 and later Vipers, but why don't America's late model F-16s have a similar luxury?

. Considering that an F-16 holds about 7,000 pounds of internal fuel, just the CFTs alone offer a 43.5 percent fuel increase with little additional drag. Also, they don't take up precious stores stations under the jet's wings or belly like traditional drop tanks

...

Adding close to 50 percent internal fuel to 25 percent of the USAF's existing F-16 fleet offers a slew of benefits, both tactically and strategically. First off, greatly enhanced loiter time and range. This will allow these F-16s to not be as closely tethered to aerial tankers as they are today, having to depart roughly every hour to refuel while over the combat area, which greatly complicates planning and can leave a hole over a key area of the battlefield. This is especially when executing critical close air support (CAS) and Wild Weasel missions.

On medium and short range missions, CFTs mean more maneuverability, less drag penalty and more weapons available per aircraft when compared to flying an F-16 with cumbersome under-wing tanks. On long-range missions, where underwing drop tanks are paired with CFTs, it means enhanced range and on station time.
Montgomery Burns
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Like most things I imagine it has something to do with money.
jfadioustoad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
More fuel is not always better. Most flying we do is for training, and we don't need 2-3 hours of loiter time for a training missions which usually last around an hour. Also, pylon space is not that big of a deal. I fly harriers and I have never flown with every pylon loaded with ordnance. But what it really boils down to is it would cost probably billions to retrofit every f-16 with CFTs.
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.