Did the SEC really get 14 teams into the field of 64

1,264 Views | 9 Replies | Last: 1 hr ago by Tramp96
FriscoKid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'm only seeing 13
Rearview
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
FriscoKid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The future is your oyster. Stop looking like **** and calling yourself a pearl.
Booma94
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
SEC had 14 in the field of 68, but only 13 in the field of 64.
rgleml
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
SEC is down to thirteen teams now.
Muy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Booma94 said:

SEC had 14 in the field of 68, but only 13 in the field of 64.


Play in games don't count, that's why they are called "play in games"
NyAggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
That's how I see it, too.

You are only in if you WIN your play in game
swc93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
rgleml said:

SEC is down to thirteen teams now.
Not looking so good for the conference. 0-1 in the tournament. That is, checks math, only .000. Well below our conference season record of .500. I am sure the talking heads will hammer this point home.
90ags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
tu should have never been there...esp due to our debacle of losing to them twice is the only reason they were even in the field of 68.
Tramp96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I enjoy watching the whorns lose no matter if it's play-in or first round.

Actually, seeing them blow a large lead against an inferior opponent (on paper) in the PLAY-IN game may actually be even sweeter.

Just wish the same fate had befallen UNC as well.
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.