Going to do the first full bracket breakdown of the season on our bye date next week, but wanted to go ahead and share a few things just for folks starting to tune in after we beat Texas. We've been popping up on bracketologies the last couple of weeks but what do the odds really look like, what's the path we need to walk, and how likely is it really?
Annual note: The whole point is that this is a projection of the rest of our season, and is not based solely on results that have already happened.
TL;DR: Right now we PROJECT as comfortably (but not super comfortably) in the field as an 8-9 seed
Full breakdown:
Current resume: NET: 42, NET WAB: 39
Predictive Metrics: BPI: 30, POM: 38, Torvik: 31
Results Metrics: KPI: 50, SOR: 37
Remaining games (projected line per Torvik):
1/21 - Mississippi State (-11)
1/24 - South Carolina (-10)
1-31 - at Georgia (+5)
2/3 - at Alabama (+11)
2/7 - Florida (+3)
2/11 - Missouri (-9)
2/14 - at Vandy (+13)
2/18 - Ole Miss (-10)
2/21 - at Oklahoma (-2)
2/25 - at Arkansas (+7)
2/28 - Texas (-6)
3/3 - Kentucky (-5)
3/7 - at LSU (+2)
Projected SEC record: 11-7
What is the point of this?
I do this every year as a compliment to ColleyvilleAg's bubble watch to give people an idea of what is projected to happen. It's one thing to look at bracketologies, but those are based mostly on what's already happened. They often do not take into account things like unbalanced schedules.
I think this is helpful to look at after games to see what will actually make a big difference when it comes to figuring out if we're going to make the tournament and/or what seed we'll be. There will be people upset that our projection doesn't change much even if we beat State and SC by double digits each, but that is what's supposed to happen. To really change our projection, results would need to deviate from the predicted results.
What are the big takeaways here?
The big thing people need to realize is that we already bagged two of the harder games on our schedule. Yes, the back half of the schedule is tougher than the front half, but by winning at Auburn and Texas, we've drastically improved our situation and now even have a little bit of margin for error for a slip up. That said, the slip up needs to not be one of these next two games. A loss to South Carolina OR Mississippi State would be our worst loss of the season.
The other thing is that some games that we might have considered long shots a few weeks ago now don't look quite so intimidating, namely Missouri and Kentucky, which are now games we figure to be significant favorites in.
That isn't what Lunardi is saying...
GTFOH
Annual note: The whole point is that this is a projection of the rest of our season, and is not based solely on results that have already happened.
TL;DR: Right now we PROJECT as comfortably (but not super comfortably) in the field as an 8-9 seed
Full breakdown:
Current resume: NET: 42, NET WAB: 39
Predictive Metrics: BPI: 30, POM: 38, Torvik: 31
Results Metrics: KPI: 50, SOR: 37
Remaining games (projected line per Torvik):
1/21 - Mississippi State (-11)
1/24 - South Carolina (-10)
1-31 - at Georgia (+5)
2/3 - at Alabama (+11)
2/7 - Florida (+3)
2/11 - Missouri (-9)
2/14 - at Vandy (+13)
2/18 - Ole Miss (-10)
2/21 - at Oklahoma (-2)
2/25 - at Arkansas (+7)
2/28 - Texas (-6)
3/3 - Kentucky (-5)
3/7 - at LSU (+2)
Projected SEC record: 11-7
What is the point of this?
I do this every year as a compliment to ColleyvilleAg's bubble watch to give people an idea of what is projected to happen. It's one thing to look at bracketologies, but those are based mostly on what's already happened. They often do not take into account things like unbalanced schedules.
I think this is helpful to look at after games to see what will actually make a big difference when it comes to figuring out if we're going to make the tournament and/or what seed we'll be. There will be people upset that our projection doesn't change much even if we beat State and SC by double digits each, but that is what's supposed to happen. To really change our projection, results would need to deviate from the predicted results.
What are the big takeaways here?
The big thing people need to realize is that we already bagged two of the harder games on our schedule. Yes, the back half of the schedule is tougher than the front half, but by winning at Auburn and Texas, we've drastically improved our situation and now even have a little bit of margin for error for a slip up. That said, the slip up needs to not be one of these next two games. A loss to South Carolina OR Mississippi State would be our worst loss of the season.
The other thing is that some games that we might have considered long shots a few weeks ago now don't look quite so intimidating, namely Missouri and Kentucky, which are now games we figure to be significant favorites in.
That isn't what Lunardi is saying...
GTFOH