Post up game

3,091 Views | 17 Replies | Last: 11 days ago by Ag1188
Redfishag93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I love what bucky's doing of course, but I'm a little concerned about the apparent little to no post up game with the team as it stands.

We ran a considerable amount of offense through Agee in the post this year and the only guy who has shown any ability in the post is clemence (not a lot by the way) and I don't see him as being able to rely on him consistently in the post.

Maybe I'm wrong bc clemence ended being much more productive late in the year than I thought he was capable of, but I don't see it.

Mgbako didn't at all appear able to produce any offense w his back to the basket…too light.

Maybe Phillips but I doubt it. He looks strong and athletic based on highlights, but I didn't see any post up skill…pretty much just lob catching.

With Vinson and Josh Irving likely in the rotation we might be done picking up bigs. I'm excited about the talent of Irving but he's not gonna be posting up anyone at 6'10" 200 lbs.
And Vinson strikes me as very similar to Phillips catching lobs… without the aggressive rebounding.

This would make us very reliant on 3s and drive and kick offense. And I don't love the drive and kick ability of a likely best 5 at this point of:

Phillips
Clemence
Mgbako
Haggerty
Warren

It appears our offense is gonna look different next year.
Goose06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
We were very limited. Did not have guards or wings with size who could create or get to the bucket so we had to rely on Agee. Our guard play and ability to get to the rim is going to be significantly improved which is going to completely change our offense.
halfastros81
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I agree a post up game and perhaps even more importantly a rim protector on the other end is going to be important for matching up with top level teams. I don't believe we have that one guy right now that can offset a Tarris Reed for UConn or a Condon for Florida type player . Maybe we're not done yet tho. If we are it'll be by committee and do the best you can. Reliable post play is not a prime tenet of this style tho on offense imo, it's more a "nice to have" . I'd say having the rim protector that opponents have on their mind is more important .

I also think we haven't seen anything close to what a truly healthy Mgbako might bring to the table , not that I think he can be a premium post player or rim protector but I do think he can mix it up inside more than what we saw in very limited play last year

If I had to guess I'd guess they are working hard to try to get an experienced long armed big that can also run on the roster but maybe it's cost prohibitive . Someone on this board … may have been Luke … suggested the staff is happy with the bigs we have tho so I could easily be wrong
JJxvi
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
With Haggerty on the court, the inside game will likely rely on reaction to dribble penetration rather than post play.
Hardworking, Unselfish, Fearless
Ag-ME
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Big post up players are fine, but they are in high demand and we probably will not be able to get one that is decent.
We are going to have to rely on the Bucky offense with smaller but aggressive players.
The Marksman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
We're going to have the guards this season to run the offense Bucky actually wants
The Marksman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ag-ME said:

Big post up players are fine, but they are in high demand and we probably will not be able to get one that is decent.
We are going to have to rely on the Bucky offense with smaller but aggressive players.

This simply isn't true. Go look at the height of the players we're bringing in. We're going to be much bigger than we were last season.
Kampfers
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
halfastros81 said:

I agree a post up game and perhaps even more importantly a rim protector on the other end is going to be important for matching up with top level teams. I don't believe we have that one guy right now that can offset a Tarris Reed for UConn or a Condon for Florida type player . Maybe we're not done yet tho. If we are it'll be by committee and do the best you can. Reliable post play is not a prime tenet of this style tho on offense imo, it's more a "nice to have" . I'd say having the rim protector that opponents have on their mind is more important .

I also think we haven't seen anything close to what a truly healthy Mgbako might bring to the table , not that I think he can be a premium post player or rim protector but I do think he can mix it up inside more than what we saw in very limited play last year

If I had to guess I'd guess they are working hard to try to get an experienced long armed big that can also run on the roster but maybe it's cost prohibitive . Someone on this board … may have been Luke … suggested the staff is happy with the bigs we have tho so I could easily be wrong

I don't think there's any "perhaps" about it - the lack of rim protection is by far the biggest deficiency on this roster. It's glaring.

We're going to try and outscore every opponent we face. It'll be a lot of fun. But it's also going to be frustrating watching teams score at the rim at will against us (unless Vinson just turns into the second coming of Robert Williams III overnight).

I'm a lot less concerned about being able to generate offense out of post-up sets. Offense won't be the problem with this roster.
The Marksman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Kampfers said:

halfastros81 said:

I agree a post up game and perhaps even more importantly a rim protector on the other end is going to be important for matching up with top level teams. I don't believe we have that one guy right now that can offset a Tarris Reed for UConn or a Condon for Florida type player . Maybe we're not done yet tho. If we are it'll be by committee and do the best you can. Reliable post play is not a prime tenet of this style tho on offense imo, it's more a "nice to have" . I'd say having the rim protector that opponents have on their mind is more important .

I also think we haven't seen anything close to what a truly healthy Mgbako might bring to the table , not that I think he can be a premium post player or rim protector but I do think he can mix it up inside more than what we saw in very limited play last year

If I had to guess I'd guess they are working hard to try to get an experienced long armed big that can also run on the roster but maybe it's cost prohibitive . Someone on this board … may have been Luke … suggested the staff is happy with the bigs we have tho so I could easily be wrong

I don't think there's any "perhaps" about it - the lack of rim protection is by far the biggest deficiency on this roster. It's glaring.

We're going to try and outscore every opponent we face. It'll be a lot of fun. But it's also going to be frustrating watching teams score at the rim at will against us
(unless Vinson just turns into the second coming of Robert Williams III overnight).

I'm a lot less concerned about being able to generate offense out of post-up sets. Offense won't be the problem with this roster.

I just don't think this is supported by any evidence. We didn't routinely allow teams to "score at the rim at will against us" last season, and we've gotten much bigger for next season. No, we don't have Robert Williams on next year's roster, but we'll have 2 forwards his size and 3 forwards/centers actually taller than him. Vinson is going to take a major step forward this offseason, and Phillips is a really good rebounder and defender in the paint. I just don't see where all this "we're gonna get dunked on every possession" paranoia is coming from. When we lost last season it was because we couldn't rebound(that problem has been solved in the portal in my opinion), we weren't as talented as the other team(also solved in the portal), or we didn't shoot at the level we needed to(solved in the portal). I think next season's roster is vastly better than last season, and I don't see lack of a true center as something that it's unrealistic to overcome. I'd love to add a center to the team(and maybe they will find a Euro for that last scholarship spot), but I trust Bucky and I really like this roster as it stands right now even without adding a center.
Kampfers
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The Marksman said:

Kampfers said:

halfastros81 said:

I agree a post up game and perhaps even more importantly a rim protector on the other end is going to be important for matching up with top level teams. I don't believe we have that one guy right now that can offset a Tarris Reed for UConn or a Condon for Florida type player . Maybe we're not done yet tho. If we are it'll be by committee and do the best you can. Reliable post play is not a prime tenet of this style tho on offense imo, it's more a "nice to have" . I'd say having the rim protector that opponents have on their mind is more important .

I also think we haven't seen anything close to what a truly healthy Mgbako might bring to the table , not that I think he can be a premium post player or rim protector but I do think he can mix it up inside more than what we saw in very limited play last year

If I had to guess I'd guess they are working hard to try to get an experienced long armed big that can also run on the roster but maybe it's cost prohibitive . Someone on this board … may have been Luke … suggested the staff is happy with the bigs we have tho so I could easily be wrong

I don't think there's any "perhaps" about it - the lack of rim protection is by far the biggest deficiency on this roster. It's glaring.

We're going to try and outscore every opponent we face. It'll be a lot of fun. But it's also going to be frustrating watching teams score at the rim at will against us
(unless Vinson just turns into the second coming of Robert Williams III overnight).

I'm a lot less concerned about being able to generate offense out of post-up sets. Offense won't be the problem with this roster.

I just don't think this is supported by any evidence. We didn't routinely allow teams to "score at the rim at will against us" last season, and we've gotten much bigger for next season. No, we don't have Robert Williams on next year's roster, but we'll have 2 forwards his size and 3 forwards/centers actually taller than him. Vinson is going to take a major step forward this offseason, and Phillips is a really good rebounder and defender in the paint. I just don't see where all this "we're gonna get dunked on every possession" paranoia is coming from. When we lost last season it was because we couldn't rebound(that problem has been solved in the portal in my opinion), we weren't as talented as the other team(also solved in the portal), or we didn't shoot at the level we needed to(solved in the portal). I think next season's roster is vastly better than last season, and I don't see lack of a true center as something that it's unrealistic to overcome. I'd love to add a center to the team(and maybe they will find a Euro for that last scholarship spot), but I trust Bucky and I really like this roster as it stands right now even without adding a center.

I'm not trying to be negative nancy here, but I'm also not going to pull wool over my eyes and just pretend everything will be fine.

If you want to assume that Vinson will take a major leap, be my guest. I'll wait to see it happen first. Phillips is a "really good rebounder and defender" - the jury is out here. He wasn't a crucial player for Tennessee, he wasn't highly valued in the portal, and he only averaged 4 boards. We have to replace 8.7 a game from Agee.

We're out here thinking we'll start Clemence at the 5. Clemence, who averaged 3 boards a game, hangs out at the 3 point line (taking him out of the battle for offensive boards), and gets pushed around like a twig on defense.

I don't see how anyone can confidently state we've solved defense and rebounding on this roster as currently constructed, even if I agree that this roster is better/more talented than last year's roster. Smells like pure hopium to me.
The Marksman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Kampfers said:

The Marksman said:

Kampfers said:

halfastros81 said:

I agree a post up game and perhaps even more importantly a rim protector on the other end is going to be important for matching up with top level teams. I don't believe we have that one guy right now that can offset a Tarris Reed for UConn or a Condon for Florida type player . Maybe we're not done yet tho. If we are it'll be by committee and do the best you can. Reliable post play is not a prime tenet of this style tho on offense imo, it's more a "nice to have" . I'd say having the rim protector that opponents have on their mind is more important .

I also think we haven't seen anything close to what a truly healthy Mgbako might bring to the table , not that I think he can be a premium post player or rim protector but I do think he can mix it up inside more than what we saw in very limited play last year

If I had to guess I'd guess they are working hard to try to get an experienced long armed big that can also run on the roster but maybe it's cost prohibitive . Someone on this board … may have been Luke … suggested the staff is happy with the bigs we have tho so I could easily be wrong

I don't think there's any "perhaps" about it - the lack of rim protection is by far the biggest deficiency on this roster. It's glaring.

We're going to try and outscore every opponent we face. It'll be a lot of fun. But it's also going to be frustrating watching teams score at the rim at will against us
(unless Vinson just turns into the second coming of Robert Williams III overnight).

I'm a lot less concerned about being able to generate offense out of post-up sets. Offense won't be the problem with this roster.

I just don't think this is supported by any evidence. We didn't routinely allow teams to "score at the rim at will against us" last season, and we've gotten much bigger for next season. No, we don't have Robert Williams on next year's roster, but we'll have 2 forwards his size and 3 forwards/centers actually taller than him. Vinson is going to take a major step forward this offseason, and Phillips is a really good rebounder and defender in the paint. I just don't see where all this "we're gonna get dunked on every possession" paranoia is coming from. When we lost last season it was because we couldn't rebound(that problem has been solved in the portal in my opinion), we weren't as talented as the other team(also solved in the portal), or we didn't shoot at the level we needed to(solved in the portal). I think next season's roster is vastly better than last season, and I don't see lack of a true center as something that it's unrealistic to overcome. I'd love to add a center to the team(and maybe they will find a Euro for that last scholarship spot), but I trust Bucky and I really like this roster as it stands right now even without adding a center.

I'm not trying to be negative nancy here, but I'm also not going to pull wool over my eyes and just pretend everything will be fine.

If you want to assume that Vinson will take a major leap, be my guest. I'll wait to see it happen first. Phillips is a "really good rebounder and defender" - the jury is out here. He wasn't a crucial player for Tennessee, he wasn't highly valued in the portal, and he only averaged 4 boards. We have to replace 8.7 a game from Agee.

We're out here thinking we'll start Clemence at the 5. Clemence, who averaged 3 boards a game, hangs out at the 3 point line (taking him out of the battle for offensive boards), and gets pushed around like a twig on defense.

I don't see how anyone can confidently state we've solved defense and rebounding on this roster as currently constructed, even if I agree that this roster is better/more talented than last year's roster. Smells like pure hopium to me.

I definitely can see where you're coming from, I just see our roster construction very differently than you do.
Vinson averaged 3.5 PPG, 2.3 RPG, and 0.6 BPG in 6.6 MPG. I think an offseason spent developing his game and putting on more muscle should allow him put up solid numbers in an expanded role. Phillips actually was sought after in the portal; Tennessee did not want him to leave, and Alabama actually recruited him heavily. During his time at Tennessee, he earned a reputation as a high-motor player, and his career offensive rebounding percentage(almost 14%) is 21st in SEC history. If Zach does start at the 5 over Phillips(I think it could go either way, and who starts doesn't matter much in BuckyBall), I agree that he's not great on defense, but hopefully he'll at least be able to reduce his fouling over the offseason. Mgbako is also someone we can count on for 4-5 RPG, and he should be an athletic defender. We're also right in it for landing 6'8 Jalen Shelley, who averaged 6.6 RPG last season.
Rebounding will also take a huge step forward with having much bigger guards than last season, which is something most people way underestimate. Gone are the short Lane, Holloway, and Hill all of whom were under 6'1, and in are 6'3 Warren, 6'4 Haggerty, 6'5 Walls, and 6'2 Mundey/6'3 Green.
Defensively, next season's roster is way more athletic than what we had last year. Archie, Phillips, and Haggerty are all solid/above average defenders, Mundey is a great defender from what I've heard about his paly in practice last season during his redshirt year, and Reece was playing really good defense towards the end of last season at LSU.
So I definetly think our defense and rebounding will be vastly improved next season.
Ag-ME
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The Marksman said:

Ag-ME said:

Big post up players are fine, but they are in high demand and we probably will not be able to get one that is decent.
We are going to have to rely on the Bucky offense with smaller but aggressive players.

This simply isn't true. Go look at the height of the players we're bringing in. We're going to be much bigger than we were last season.


Yes we will be bigger than last year. What i am saying we will not end up with a talented 7+ footer that will be dominating in the lane.
OldFox61
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Maybe 6-11 freshman Joshua Irving will be able to help protect the rim.
halfastros81
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Maybe but he's light and will get moved around a lot by stronger , heavier bigs.
jeremy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Goose06 said:

We were very limited. Did not have guards or wings with size who could create or get to the bucket so we had to rely on Agee. Our guard play and ability to get to the rim is going to be significantly improved which is going to completely change our offense.


Do you know of a team last year who would be a good model to watch what our offense would look like with this year's roster?
Dimond1968
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The lack of size is a real issue. Basketball is back to getting bigger. The better teams are all big.
halfastros81
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rather the lack of size was a big issue . We got considerably bigger across the board. We still don't have that one guy that opponent's know could slap their shot into the stands at any time but other than that that our paint presence will be significantly improved imo.
Ag1188
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
OldFox61 said:

Maybe 6-11 freshman Joshua Irving will be able to help protect the rim.
He is definitely who we need to be great and it's possible. Supposed to be athletic and a rim-protector.
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.