We don't take winning seriously enough like one of the other schools in the state. Sickening.
Blinnaggie2002 said:
We don't take winning seriously enough like one of the other schools in the state. Sickening.
hunter2012 said:
I believe the word is called cope
WhataMaroon88 said:
We have to identify the problems first. We had a top 5 offense so offense isn't it. Our starting pitching was downright atrocious at times. So try to fix that first… attempt made.
Manager moves don't always work out. Look at the Cubs. They grabbed Craig Counsel from the Brewers and nothing has changed. The Cubs look identical and are still
Getting beat like a rented mule by the Brewers.
WhataMaroon88 said:
We have to identify the problems first. We had a top 5 offense so offense isn't it. Our starting pitching was downright atrocious at times. So try to fix that first… attempt made.
Manager moves don't always work out. Look at the Cubs. They grabbed Craig Counsel from the Brewers and nothing has changed. The Cubs look identical and are still
Getting beat like a rented mule by the Brewers.
Captain Pablo said:WhataMaroon88 said:
We have to identify the problems first. We had a top 5 offense so offense isn't it. Our starting pitching was downright atrocious at times. So try to fix that first… attempt made.
Manager moves don't always work out. Look at the Cubs. They grabbed Craig Counsel from the Brewers and nothing has changed. The Cubs look identical and are still
Getting beat like a rented mule by the Brewers.
Offense sure as hell was a problem the last several weeks. Especially when it counted
AgRyan04 said:WhataMaroon88 said:
We have to identify the problems first. We had a top 5 offense so offense isn't it. Our starting pitching was downright atrocious at times. So try to fix that first… attempt made.
Manager moves don't always work out. Look at the Cubs. They grabbed Craig Counsel from the Brewers and nothing has changed. The Cubs look identical and are still
Getting beat like a rented mule by the Brewers.
The pitching problem was identified last off-season and was clearly not addressed appropriately
Blinnaggie2002 said:
We don't take winning seriously enough like one of the other schools in the state. Sickening.
agsalaska said:
Earley is a failure of a head coach at A&M in every definition of the word. But now we are stuck with him.
He should have been fired last year. But we were dumb and stuck with him. Now we are…..stuck with him. This year is our future.
We are now stuck with this crap for probably two more years.
Outside of a three week or so stretch this team wasn't much different than last year. In our future We will UIL whip our way into some wins and have some streaks and catch some luck. It this is it. This is what we can expect.
Thanks everyone who supported keeping Earley. You own this. Great programs would have fired him.
Edit to fix the spelling of his name. Autocorrect was being too aggressive
TarponChaser said:AgRyan04 said:WhataMaroon88 said:
We have to identify the problems first. We had a top 5 offense so offense isn't it. Our starting pitching was downright atrocious at times. So try to fix that first… attempt made.
Manager moves don't always work out. Look at the Cubs. They grabbed Craig Counsel from the Brewers and nothing has changed. The Cubs look identical and are still
Getting beat like a rented mule by the Brewers.
The pitching problem was identified last off-season and was clearly not addressed appropriately
When 2 portal arms don't make it to campus because of off-field issues and it's too late to replace them plus 2 more studs who were expected to be big time contributors go down for TJ before the end of February and all 4 were expected to be 4 of your top 8-10 arms you start off in a hole.
Add in losing your ace the last month of the season and all the steps taken to address pitching in the offseason are rendered moot.
AgRyan04 said:TarponChaser said:AgRyan04 said:WhataMaroon88 said:
We have to identify the problems first. We had a top 5 offense so offense isn't it. Our starting pitching was downright atrocious at times. So try to fix that first… attempt made.
Manager moves don't always work out. Look at the Cubs. They grabbed Craig Counsel from the Brewers and nothing has changed. The Cubs look identical and are still
Getting beat like a rented mule by the Brewers.
The pitching problem was identified last off-season and was clearly not addressed appropriately
When 2 portal arms don't make it to campus because of off-field issues and it's too late to replace them plus 2 more studs who were expected to be big time contributors go down for TJ before the end of February and all 4 were expected to be 4 of your top 8-10 arms you start off in a hole.
Add in losing your ace the last month of the season and all the steps taken to address pitching in the offseason are rendered moot.
Even before the injuries, they didn't get the arms they needed. You know you're going to have injuries - thats part of the baseball post-2000, which is why it is so critical to stack up arm talent.
When portal arms don't make it to campus due to off-field problems, that is a huge issue. You either had bad eval on the players - or - you knew there was a risk and overlooked it. It doesn't absolve the fact that the pitching issues weren't resolved - because at the end of the day, they weren't resolved.
dermdoc said:AgRyan04 said:TarponChaser said:AgRyan04 said:WhataMaroon88 said:
We have to identify the problems first. We had a top 5 offense so offense isn't it. Our starting pitching was downright atrocious at times. So try to fix that first… attempt made.
Manager moves don't always work out. Look at the Cubs. They grabbed Craig Counsel from the Brewers and nothing has changed. The Cubs look identical and are still
Getting beat like a rented mule by the Brewers.
The pitching problem was identified last off-season and was clearly not addressed appropriately
When 2 portal arms don't make it to campus because of off-field issues and it's too late to replace them plus 2 more studs who were expected to be big time contributors go down for TJ before the end of February and all 4 were expected to be 4 of your top 8-10 arms you start off in a hole.
Add in losing your ace the last month of the season and all the steps taken to address pitching in the offseason are rendered moot.
Even before the injuries, they didn't get the arms they needed. You know you're going to have injuries - thats part of the baseball post-2000, which is why it is so critical to stack up arm talent.
When portal arms don't make it to campus due to off-field problems, that is a huge issue. You either had bad eval on the players - or - you knew there was a risk and overlooked it. It doesn't absolve the fact that the pitching issues weren't resolved - because at the end of the day, they weren't resolved.
It would be much easier on everybody if we would just say Fire Earley or Keep Earley. It is that simple.
lots of wasted words,
AgRyan04 said:dermdoc said:AgRyan04 said:TarponChaser said:AgRyan04 said:WhataMaroon88 said:
We have to identify the problems first. We had a top 5 offense so offense isn't it. Our starting pitching was downright atrocious at times. So try to fix that first… attempt made.
Manager moves don't always work out. Look at the Cubs. They grabbed Craig Counsel from the Brewers and nothing has changed. The Cubs look identical and are still
Getting beat like a rented mule by the Brewers.
The pitching problem was identified last off-season and was clearly not addressed appropriately
When 2 portal arms don't make it to campus because of off-field issues and it's too late to replace them plus 2 more studs who were expected to be big time contributors go down for TJ before the end of February and all 4 were expected to be 4 of your top 8-10 arms you start off in a hole.
Add in losing your ace the last month of the season and all the steps taken to address pitching in the offseason are rendered moot.
Even before the injuries, they didn't get the arms they needed. You know you're going to have injuries - thats part of the baseball post-2000, which is why it is so critical to stack up arm talent.
When portal arms don't make it to campus due to off-field problems, that is a huge issue. You either had bad eval on the players - or - you knew there was a risk and overlooked it. It doesn't absolve the fact that the pitching issues weren't resolved - because at the end of the day, they weren't resolved.
It would be much easier on everybody if we would just say Fire Earley or Keep Earley. It is that simple.
lots of wasted words,
Message boards in general are wasted words
LB12MEEN said:
Portal players that never make it to campus is not addressing anything.
Counting on Stewart coming off so many prior injuries, good luck with that one bc he had issues almost every year in college and finally hung it up. Was anyone actually surprised at all with this one?
Prior to the season pitching was the number one concern by all for this team. If it's such a great concern prior to the season ever starting, that means pitching was NOT properly addressed prior to the season.
dermdoc said:AgRyan04 said:dermdoc said:AgRyan04 said:TarponChaser said:AgRyan04 said:WhataMaroon88 said:
We have to identify the problems first. We had a top 5 offense so offense isn't it. Our starting pitching was downright atrocious at times. So try to fix that first… attempt made.
Manager moves don't always work out. Look at the Cubs. They grabbed Craig Counsel from the Brewers and nothing has changed. The Cubs look identical and are still
Getting beat like a rented mule by the Brewers.
The pitching problem was identified last off-season and was clearly not addressed appropriately
When 2 portal arms don't make it to campus because of off-field issues and it's too late to replace them plus 2 more studs who were expected to be big time contributors go down for TJ before the end of February and all 4 were expected to be 4 of your top 8-10 arms you start off in a hole.
Add in losing your ace the last month of the season and all the steps taken to address pitching in the offseason are rendered moot.
Even before the injuries, they didn't get the arms they needed. You know you're going to have injuries - thats part of the baseball post-2000, which is why it is so critical to stack up arm talent.
When portal arms don't make it to campus due to off-field problems, that is a huge issue. You either had bad eval on the players - or - you knew there was a risk and overlooked it. It doesn't absolve the fact that the pitching issues weren't resolved - because at the end of the day, they weren't resolved.
It would be much easier on everybody if we would just say Fire Earley or Keep Earley. It is that simple.
lots of wasted words,
Message boards in general are wasted words
Except recruits and their families read them.
LB12MEEN said:
If that was actually an option yes, but it has been posted on here by those that state they have connections if he made a regional he would be retained. And I'm not surprised by that given the contract details.
The team has tons more to fix this season than last so it will all work itself out. Lots of concerns with Earley's first two years, the most for my self that both seasons the team faded the last month of the season and digressed. A&M coaches with that trend in any sport typically don't get another contract.
Blinnaggie2002 said:
We don't take winning seriously enough like one of the other schools in the state. Sickening.
dermdoc said:AgRyan04 said:TarponChaser said:AgRyan04 said:WhataMaroon88 said:
We have to identify the problems first. We had a top 5 offense so offense isn't it. Our starting pitching was downright atrocious at times. So try to fix that first… attempt made.
Manager moves don't always work out. Look at the Cubs. They grabbed Craig Counsel from the Brewers and nothing has changed. The Cubs look identical and are still
Getting beat like a rented mule by the Brewers.
The pitching problem was identified last off-season and was clearly not addressed appropriately
When 2 portal arms don't make it to campus because of off-field issues and it's too late to replace them plus 2 more studs who were expected to be big time contributors go down for TJ before the end of February and all 4 were expected to be 4 of your top 8-10 arms you start off in a hole.
Add in losing your ace the last month of the season and all the steps taken to address pitching in the offseason are rendered moot.
Even before the injuries, they didn't get the arms they needed. You know you're going to have injuries - thats part of the baseball post-2000, which is why it is so critical to stack up arm talent.
When portal arms don't make it to campus due to off-field problems, that is a huge issue. You either had bad eval on the players - or - you knew there was a risk and overlooked it. It doesn't absolve the fact that the pitching issues weren't resolved - because at the end of the day, they weren't resolved.
It would be much easier on everybody if we would just say Fire Earley or Keep Earley. It is that simple.
lots of wasted words,
Bunk Moreland said:dermdoc said:AgRyan04 said:TarponChaser said:AgRyan04 said:WhataMaroon88 said:
We have to identify the problems first. We had a top 5 offense so offense isn't it. Our starting pitching was downright atrocious at times. So try to fix that first… attempt made.
Manager moves don't always work out. Look at the Cubs. They grabbed Craig Counsel from the Brewers and nothing has changed. The Cubs look identical and are still
Getting beat like a rented mule by the Brewers.
The pitching problem was identified last off-season and was clearly not addressed appropriately
When 2 portal arms don't make it to campus because of off-field issues and it's too late to replace them plus 2 more studs who were expected to be big time contributors go down for TJ before the end of February and all 4 were expected to be 4 of your top 8-10 arms you start off in a hole.
Add in losing your ace the last month of the season and all the steps taken to address pitching in the offseason are rendered moot.
Even before the injuries, they didn't get the arms they needed. You know you're going to have injuries - thats part of the baseball post-2000, which is why it is so critical to stack up arm talent.
When portal arms don't make it to campus due to off-field problems, that is a huge issue. You either had bad eval on the players - or - you knew there was a risk and overlooked it. It doesn't absolve the fact that the pitching issues weren't resolved - because at the end of the day, they weren't resolved.
It would be much easier on everybody if we would just say Fire Earley or Keep Earley. It is that simple.
lots of wasted words,
This is, with all due respect, pure stupidity. While there are hand grenade posters who just want him gone, and there are the others who blindly want to feel like an Aggie elite by saying they're pro program no matter what until a change is made, there actually is good discussion in the middle on this board. Way more so on this board than basketball and of course football.
Don't try to make it black and white.
I'm a perfect example. I wished we moved on from the Earley experiment after year 1 but clearly seeing resources and commitment to the program and external interest in the job or lack thereof meant another year was necessary gave him another run at it. And he has now earned the chance to keep at it with this season's results.
That said, a TON of the production leaves and pitching has to get massively improved immediately. So OK let's go again.
It's fine to ping pong the discussion on him even with the extremes because so far he's worthy of it. Stop trying to paint people into a corner. We're here for the talk.
(the debating in the gray) And you always have my respect. Bunk Moreland said:
Yeah yeah. Black and white. Good response. I'll help you out my good friend on here, you're too old for that ***** (the debating in the gray) And you always have my respect.
Wicked Good Ag said:
what I dont understand is why everyone is ready to fire Earley after year two?
Scholss did much better in year one of the tenure to which i dont think anyone can disagree
They did the same in year two post season wise and Earley did better regular season wise and standing in the conference wise while getting a home regional vs being on the road
Then Schloss went out and transformed the entire lineup from '23 to '24 with exception of Jace
Earley has to do a lot of the same in '27 so until that happens I dont see a need to continue to hash out the Fire Earley crowd and the Keep Earley crowd...he isnt going anywhere after this season nor should he but he will have to transform a lineup and pitching rotation
Wicked Good Ag said:
what I dont understand is why everyone is ready to fire Earley after year two?
Scholss did much better in year one of the tenure to which i dont think anyone can disagree
They did the same in year two post season wise and Earley did better regular season wise and standing in the conference wise while getting a home regional vs being on the road
Then Schloss went out and transformed the entire lineup from '23 to '24 with exception of Jace
Earley has to do a lot of the same in '27 so until that happens I dont see a need to continue to hash out the Fire Earley crowd and the Keep Earley crowd...he isnt going anywhere after this season nor should he but he will have to transform a lineup and pitching rotation
AgRyan04 said:Wicked Good Ag said:
what I dont understand is why everyone is ready to fire Earley after year two?
Scholss did much better in year one of the tenure to which i dont think anyone can disagree
They did the same in year two post season wise and Earley did better regular season wise and standing in the conference wise while getting a home regional vs being on the road
Then Schloss went out and transformed the entire lineup from '23 to '24 with exception of Jace
Earley has to do a lot of the same in '27 so until that happens I dont see a need to continue to hash out the Fire Earley crowd and the Keep Earley crowd...he isnt going anywhere after this season nor should he but he will have to transform a lineup and pitching rotation
If you don't understand why then you haven't actually read the threads - it's been spelled out pretty explicitly.
It wasn't allowed to be discussed during the season and now you want it to not be discussed in the offseason?
Bunk Moreland said:dermdoc said:AgRyan04 said:TarponChaser said:AgRyan04 said:WhataMaroon88 said:
We have to identify the problems first. We had a top 5 offense so offense isn't it. Our starting pitching was downright atrocious at times. So try to fix that first… attempt made.
Manager moves don't always work out. Look at the Cubs. They grabbed Craig Counsel from the Brewers and nothing has changed. The Cubs look identical and are still
Getting beat like a rented mule by the Brewers.
The pitching problem was identified last off-season and was clearly not addressed appropriately
When 2 portal arms don't make it to campus because of off-field issues and it's too late to replace them plus 2 more studs who were expected to be big time contributors go down for TJ before the end of February and all 4 were expected to be 4 of your top 8-10 arms you start off in a hole.
Add in losing your ace the last month of the season and all the steps taken to address pitching in the offseason are rendered moot.
Even before the injuries, they didn't get the arms they needed. You know you're going to have injuries - thats part of the baseball post-2000, which is why it is so critical to stack up arm talent.
When portal arms don't make it to campus due to off-field problems, that is a huge issue. You either had bad eval on the players - or - you knew there was a risk and overlooked it. It doesn't absolve the fact that the pitching issues weren't resolved - because at the end of the day, they weren't resolved.
It would be much easier on everybody if we would just say Fire Earley or Keep Earley. It is that simple.
lots of wasted words,
This is, with all due respect, pure stupidity. While there are hand grenade posters who just want him gone, and there are the others who blindly want to feel like an Aggie elite by saying they're pro program no matter what until a change is made, there actually is good discussion in the middle on this board. Way more so on this board than basketball and of course football.
Don't try to make it black and white.
I'm a perfect example. I wished we moved on from the Earley experiment after year 1 but clearly seeing resources and commitment to the program and external interest in the job or lack thereof meant another year was necessary gave him another run at it. And he has now earned the chance to keep at it with this season's results.
That said, a TON of the production leaves and pitching has to get massively improved immediately. So OK let's go again.
It's fine to ping pong the discussion on him even with the extremes because so far he's worthy of it. Stop trying to paint people into a corner. We're here for the talk.