PJYoung said:Lateralus Ag said:PJYoung said:
Interesting thread.
Which also means that the fatality rate is grossly overblown.
Excellent information. And really good news.
Probably not since the deaths would not have been tested either unfortunately. People die of pneumonia literally all of the time.
Well you posted about guesstimated infections, what is your guesstimate for untested deaths?PJYoung said:Lateralus Ag said:PJYoung said:
Interesting thread.
Which also means that the fatality rate is grossly overblown.
Excellent information. And really good news.
Probably not since the deaths would not have been tested either unfortunately. People die of pneumonia literally all of the time.
Vernada said:
If you look at the sticky post at the top of this forum, you'll see the same thing. The mortality rate is almost certainly overblown because we have not been testing appropriately. Once testing increases, we will see a 'surge' in cases which will bring down the mortality rate.
The overall case fatality rate certainly will go down. It's a 2.27% now, I'd wager we'll end up between 0.3-0.7%. Which is still high.Vernada said:
If you look at the sticky post at the top of this forum, you'll see the same thing. The mortality rate is almost certainly overblown because we have not been testing appropriately. Once testing increases, we will see a 'surge' in cases which will bring down the mortality rate.
Lateralus Ag said:PJYoung said:Lateralus Ag said:PJYoung said:
Interesting thread.
Which also means that the fatality rate is grossly overblown.
Excellent information. And really good news.
Probably not since the deaths would not have been tested either unfortunately. People die of pneumonia literally all of the time.
You can't have it both ways. Count them or don't.
Lateralus Ag said:PJYoung said:Lateralus Ag said:PJYoung said:
Interesting thread.
Which also means that the fatality rate is grossly overblown.
Excellent information. And really good news.
Probably not since the deaths would not have been tested either unfortunately. People die of pneumonia literally all of the time.
You can't have it both ways. Count them or don't.
Quote:
It seems like a large percentage of the positive tests are from people who traveled to Europe recently.
All A&M said:
Are those estimates based on taking no action or does it already account for the massive social distancing that most are now practicing until spring (school closures, event cancellations, work from home, etc.)?
nortex97 said:
The mortality rate is .1 to 1 percent. Stop the hysteria.
nortex97 said:
The mortality rate is .1 to 1 percent. Stop the hysteria.
It's like they have North Korea right next door and we're halfway prepared for such contingencies....PJYoung said:All A&M said:
Are those estimates based on taking no action or does it already account for the massive social distancing that most are now practicing until spring (school closures, event cancellations, work from home, etc.)?
That is SK death rate and they handled this way way way better than we have so far.
PJYoung said:All A&M said:
Are those estimates based on taking no action or does it already account for the massive social distancing that most are now practicing until spring (school closures, event cancellations, work from home, etc.)?
That is SK death rate and they handled this way way way better than we have so far.
lockett93 said:PJYoung said:All A&M said:
Are those estimates based on taking no action or does it already account for the massive social distancing that most are now practicing until spring (school closures, event cancellations, work from home, etc.)?
That is SK death rate and they handled this way way way better than we have so far.
The main reason for the much lower SK death rate is the increased denominator... they've tested everyone from the beginning. Latest number is 0.73% death rate in SK.
The US death rate is currently very skewed by the Washington State nursing home. Washington State accounts for 37 of the 50 US deaths per the NYT
nortex97 said:
The mortality rate is .1 to 1 percent. Stop the hysteria.
NASAg03 said:
Why does Ohio keep saying they have 100k cases?
Yep. And 3-5 times that number will need hospitalization.H.E. Pennypacker said:nortex97 said:
The mortality rate is .1 to 1 percent. Stop the hysteria.
Multiply .5 (somewhere between your purported best case and worst case range) times just even half of our national population of 350 million. The math is unrelenting. You have to make sure a significant portion of the population does not all get this within a short period of time.
Could be that people who have travelled are mostly the ones going to the doctor. It's the end of the cold/flu season and allergies are starting up too. If the average case is as mild as they say it is, most people I know would never go to the doctor for it. But if they've just come back from overseas, they'd probably be going to the doc as soon as they fel5 the first minor symptom.AustinAg2K said:
I question all these supposed hidden cases. It seems like a large percentage of the positive tests are from people who traveled to Europe recently. If we have 10k hidden cases, I would expect a smaller percentage of the positives to be people who recently traveled and more of the community spread people.