88planoAg said:
Hmm. But if by definition 1) you can't keep social distance 2) you can be asymptomatic but contagious
Shouldn't there be masks used?
you can keep social distance except for the brief phlebotomy (needle stick and withdraw). And the guidance states that prolonged contact with an infected person is how the disease is transmitted, through hand/face contact. Prolonged being defined as more than 10 minutes within 6 feet of an infected person.
Wearing a mask does not protect the donor nor the staff any more that anything else. It only compounds the chance of them having to touch their face.
Then likelihood of transmitting it via normal breaths from brief contact are slim and blood banks must follow the guidances and recommendations of the cdc and FDA
now compound the supply issues this would cause. Phlebotomists change their glove multiple times on the same donor and in between each donor. Add onto that having to change your mask between each donor when screened and each donor during phlebotomy. Generally a different person will screen than who sticks.
Because you wouldn't want to use the same mask between 2 different donors, that means that a blood drive seeing 30 donors would have to use at least 60 masks. More than likely, since there are generally at least 4 staff on a small blood drive, and each has to change their mask twice for each donor, that would mean about 160 masks for each drive.
All to screen/stick healthy people by healthy people. It's not warranted, nor is it feasible. All the while hospitals are short the same masks for their staff while actively treating known infected people.
Eta: all this being said. If the cdc and FDA come out with new guidance and change it based on new facts of viral transmission, not on public perception on the efficacy of masks, then blood banks will follow suit to meet those guidances.