TWiV 600: Shifting from ARDS to High Altitude Sickness

2,157 Views | 10 Replies | Last: 5 yr ago by Kool
Ranger222
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Latest TWiV Episode with Update from Daniel Griffin at Columbia --

Hitting some of the high points of the conversation, less new info in this one.

Finally seeing admission rates decreasing at NY area hospitals, however now in a conundrum that almost all of the new admissions are very sick patients that will most likely see mortality rate increase of people who are admitted into hospitals in coming weeks. Thankful that many people of gotten the message only seek medical care if you are struggling to breathe and need oxygen.

Having issues getting oxygen to patients. Just don't have the capacity.

Avoid steroids first week (will double mortality risk), but give 2nd week when you begin to see oxygen requirements.

Hypercoagulability -- seeing this more in patients who were doing better then tend to get worse. D-dimer predictive marker of poorer outcomes, along with IL-6. D-dimer is going up while all other markers improving. Patients are developing clots leading to oxygen delivery issues. Will clog blood vessels to lungs, and other organs leading to organ failure.

Approach to treating as ARDS not working. When patients go on vents, mortality 50/50. When patients went on ventilator, they began to get worse with PEEP. Symptoms more like high altitude sickness so trying to use lower pressures and other tricks like keeping patients on belly. Also tolerating lower oxygen saturation ( < 80%) before putting on ventilator.

On hydroxycholorquine -- the way it is used currently (given 2nd week) makes no sense. Giving it when viral titers are already on the decline. Have found it makes no difference or actually makes it worse. Associated with worse clinical outcomes.

Again discharging patients before they are clear of the virus -- they are still shedders. Guidelines are that you shouldn't be out for at least a week after leaving the hospital, but may need to adjust that out longer, perhaps even 30+ days.

On virus binding heme -- doesn't make sense and all based on computer simulations, no evidence.

Everything settling down a bit, less hysteria -- must remember oath to do no harm. Still some trying to capitalize by offering "the latest therapy" when that therapy is not proven and may actually do more harm than good.

Greater risk to pregnant women doesn't seem to exist like there was in MERS or H1N1 outbreaks (10x mortality risk). Pregnant women seem to be doing just as well, haven't seen any signal that says they are doing worse. Still some risks -- don't know what infection does in first trimester and not really following up after birth yet. Would not take baby away from mother, advocates breast feeding to potentially pass protective antibodies.

Griffin is the primary investigator on two different clinical trials (patchstudy.com) with hydroxychloroquine -- Patch 2 study is someone acutely infected and will be given drug or placebo. 500 total patients, primary end point (data readout) will be whether or not you ended up in the hospital. Patch 3 study is prophylactic for healthcare workers at a higher dose than what is being given in Patch 2 study. All Patch studies double-blinded and controlled. Expect results end of this month/beginning of May.

On serology tests -- thought this was interesting -- one issue in developing test has been cross-reactivity for antibodies with the "common cold" coronaviruses. HKU1, another beta-coronavirus, has a spike protein that is similar enough that it is showing cross-reactivity in a lot of the tests. Have worked through this and now they have a specific test for SARS-CoV-2 that are beginning to role out. However this may explain some of the "bad readings" on tests you've seen so far in the news and may also offer hints to people who are asymptomatic or have "milder cases", and not seeing it in children (my personal opinion).

Not sure how to deal with individuals taking steroids (low dose) for things like allergies (Flonase). Would like to say stop taking these things or else it may help viral replication, but just don't have enough data right now to really know.

On ACE inhibitors -- keep taking them if you are prescribed.

-----

That's it on the Griffin interview. Will update if anything else interesting comes up.
jagvocate
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The Flonase thing is scary as I take it religiously his time of year to keep some sinus infections.

Infection_Ag11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I don't really understand these repeated references to ARDS protocols "not working". I'll defer to the pulm/crit guys here, but my understanding is severe ARDS across all etiologies has an overall mortality of 35-50%. The fact that it's "50/50" in intubated COVID patients seems to be what we'd expect.

The steroids rec is pretty cavalier given what we know about steroids in severe influenza infections. You could literally be killing your patient.
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
Marcus Aurelius
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Most of those points have been mentioned on various threads here. Agree with semantics of saying ARDS Rx "not working" is misleading. Without ventilators for severe respiratory failure not responding to HFNC, 100% NRBs, CPAP 15cm +,etc the mortality in these patients would certainly be 100%.

ARDS mortality from all causes is around 40%. COVID-19 ARDS ventilator published mortality 75-90%. I'm seeing about the same at my hospital. We have 2 pts "lingering" on vents that will likely get trached. As mentioned on other threads - the "intubate early" notion is not in favor. HIgh PEEPS are not as well. Proning standard of care IMO for severely hypoxic pts.
Infection_Ag11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Marcus Aurelius said:

Most of those points have been mentioned on various threads here. Agree with semantics of saying ARDS Rx "not working" is misleading. Without ventilators for severe respiratory failure not responding to HFNC, 100% NRBs, CPAP 15cm +,etc the mortality in these patients would certainly be 100%.

ARDS mortality from all causes is around 40%. COVID-19 ARDS ventilator published mortality 75-90%. I'm seeing about the same at my hospital. We have 2 pts "lingering" on vents that will likely get trached. As mentioned on other threads - the "intubate early" notion is not in favor. HIgh PEEPS are not as well. Proning standard of care IMO for severely hypoxic pts.


Thanks

I think the mortality of vented patients with determined outcomes I've seen is right at 50% (4 deaths, 4 extubated) with multiple still TBD.
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
Ranger222
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Infection_Ag11 said:

I don't really understand these repeated references to ARDS protocols "not working". I'll defer to the pulm/crit guys here, but my understanding is severe ARDS across all etiologies has an overall mortality of 35-50%. The fact that it's "50/50" in intubated COVID patients seems to be what we'd expect.

The steroids rec is pretty cavalier given what we know about steroids in severe influenza infections. You could literally be killing your patient.

I probably shouldn't have stated it as "not working" as that is probably not what Dr. Griffin stated, but the rethinking of certain protocols. A couple weeks ago they mentioned they were trying to vent patients early as they thought it might lead to better outcomes, now it appears they have shifted to trying to not vent if possible trying to manage lower oxygen saturation levels longer than they typically would.

He did mention though positive end pressure he thought was hurting more than helping in terms of damage or exacerbating damage to the alveoli.
AggieFlyboy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
jagvocate said:

The Flonase thing is scary as I take it religiously his time of year to keep some sinus infections.

I switched to Xlear (Saline w/xylitol) about six months ago. Better relief, no loss of smell and no steroids
TAMU1990
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So are we supposed to stop allergy sprays now (before you are sick) are once you become sick?
Dr. Not Yet Dr. Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Our hospital is actually electing for awake VV-ECMO on patients failing HFNO/awake proning. Per one of my ICU buddies, these patients seem to be doing well and not requiring intubation. Its pretty sweet to see this being done at a non-academic center.
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
Marcus Aurelius
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Great idea. Not practical at my hospital due to scarce ECMO units. And our CT surgeons who place the lines do so under GETA. So would require paradigm shift.
Infection_Ag11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Dr. Not Yet Dr. Ag said:

Our hospital is actually electing for awake VV-ECMO on patients failing HFNO/awake proning. Per one of my ICU buddies, these patients seem to be doing well and not requiring intubation. Its pretty sweet to see this being done at a non-academic center.


We've had two on ECMO, and they've actually done well
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
Kool
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Wendy 1990 said:

So are we supposed to stop allergy sprays now (before you are sick) are once you become sick?
There isn't data on this as of yet. There is less than 1% systemic uptake with nasal steroids if you are using them properly (look down at toes, aim a bit to the side wall, breathe in very gently or else it all runs down your throat and you swallow it). I would think nasal steroids would have very little effect on viral replication, but who knows. If you want to change to something else, talk to your telemed doctor about switching from nasal steroids to nasal antihistamines such as Azelastine. Tastes nasty (you can add a bit of Splenda and it doesn't effect how it works), but it works very well. It is by prescription only, so you'll need to contact your physician.
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.