Deaths WITH the virus versus deaths FROM the virus

3,380 Views | 16 Replies | Last: 5 yr ago by cav14
BusterAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Levitt, nobel proze data scientist, has a good point on the fact that the death rate reports that we are seeing are unreliable because of how COVID deaths are being recorded.

The fact that the CDC is reporting everyone that dies with COVID as a COVID death, whether or not the virus was a contributing factor, is EXTREMELY troubling. Add in the factor that a lot of the people dying WITH COVID were extremely vulnerable, and might have died anyway, and I just don't trust the data at all.

I am interested if anyone has seen any analysis that tries to work out this difference?

Let's set aside anecdote cases of younger people who went into a cytokine storm and died expectantly. Those cases happened and are happening. That is bad. But, it's tough to tell what % of the cases were actually like this, as opposed to dying with a gunshot would while having COVID.

For example, have we seen any reporting on the number of people that died while on ventilators compared to overall cases? The number of people that died due to upper respiratory infections that had COVID compared to average deaths of upper respiratory infections?
agforlife97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
That's why Levitt is looking at excess death data. That's the only way to really tell, and he's concluding that it's much more similar to a severe flu season that people seem to realize.
Complete Idiot
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I am not sure if you can definitely prove a single cause of death. A COVID test can prove, reasonably, whether or not they had COVID and symptoms presented prior to death could reasonably be assigned as a respiratory issue. I think. But not sure if you can definitely prove COPD or heart issue or obesity killed them vs yes, they had those manageable diseases but COVID tipped them over the edge. I do like studying typical deaths for this time frame historically vs deaths for this time frame in 2020, adds to the data of how many deaths had respiratory issue at death. Nothing will be perfect I don't think.

One thing about Michael Levitt, if you google him and include different time frames - like back in feb/mar or more recently - it's easy to see he's been all over the news. He's really put himself out there and lot and seems to like it. There are dozens, if not a hundred plus, living Nobel Laureates from the sciences and economics but he seems to be the most vocal. https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/nobel-laureate-israel-will-have-no-more-than-ten-coronavirus-deaths-621407 It should be noted Israel has 25K cases and 320 deaths, but perhaps Levitt only thinks 5-10 have been legitimately recorded as due to Covid?
BusterAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

Quote:

A COVID test can prove, reasonably, whether or not they had COVID and symptoms presented prior to death could reasonably be assigned as a respiratory issue.

I would much more prefer to rely on the Dr.'s professional opinion than just assume cause of death is COVID.

Maybe you capture both statistics? 1) Did the patient have COVID? 2) Does the Dr., in his professional opinion, believe COVID was the cause of death or a major contributing factor?

We don't have data set #2. We have to assume that data set #1 is higher than data set #2, because we know that there are at least some gunshot wound cases that got counted as COVID deaths. I'm just looking for analysis from clever data scientists that are looking at ways to estimate data set #2.
Complete Idiot
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BusterAg said:

Quote:

Quote:

A COVID test can prove, reasonably, whether or not they had COVID and symptoms presented prior to death could reasonably be assigned as a respiratory issue.

I would much more prefer to rely on the Dr.'s professional opinion than just assume cause of death is COVID.

Maybe you capture both statistics? 1) Did the patient have COVID? 2) Does the Dr., in his professional opinion, believe COVID was the cause of death or a major contributing factor?

We don't have data set #2. We have to assume that data set #1 is higher than data set #2, because we know that there are at least some gunshot wound cases that got counted as COVID deaths. I'm just looking for analysis from clever data scientists that are looking at ways to estimate data set #2.
I think we do have the data you are referring to, but whether or not you or I should believe I guess is up for debate or opinion . This is where the CDC keeps its flu/Covid/Pneumonia data, as well as death burden compared to expected deaths (historically determined I guess): https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid19/index.htm

I also think doctors/facilities do have to complete a death report, and they do have to indicate a cause of death. Sometimes these reports can lag and not be taken into account in a timely fashion.

I have to admit when you mention "gunshot wounds counted as Covid deaths" I kind of tune out, it's hard to find a valid news source that would support that position in any statistically significant way. Of the 130K US deaths attributed to COVID, how many also had a gunshot wound?
eidetic78
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BusterAg said:

Levitt, nobel proze data scientist, has a good point on the fact that the death rate reports that we are seeing are unreliable because of how COVID deaths are being recorded.

The fact that the CDC is reporting everyone that dies with COVID as a COVID death, whether or not the virus was a contributing factor, is EXTREMELY troubling. Add in the factor that a lot of the people dying WITH COVID were extremely vulnerable, and might have died anyway, and I just don't trust the data at all.

I am interested if anyone has seen any analysis that tries to work out this difference?

Let's set aside anecdote cases of younger people who went into a cytokine storm and died expectantly. Those cases happened and are happening. That is bad. But, it's tough to tell what % of the cases were actually like this, as opposed to dying with a gunshot would while having COVID.

For example, have we seen any reporting on the number of people that died while on ventilators compared to overall cases? The number of people that died due to upper respiratory infections that had COVID compared to average deaths of upper respiratory infections?
You can view the CDC's own advice here

I'd be interested to see a single gunshot wound death that has covid listed as an underlying cause. Assuming this isn't some scenario where they were in the hospital recovering from a GSW, contracted covid there, and died. This just seems like hyperbole otherwise.

Deaths are reported as having an immediate cause followed by any underlying causes and any comorbidities. It's up to the individual physician to determine, for any given covid positive patient that dies, whether that disease contributed to their death. If that's their opinion, then it will be listed as an underlying cause.

If someone is 115 years old, has every comorbidity under the sun, contracts covid and dies from respiratory failure, how should that be reported?

The CDC only reports data supplied to them by the states. If covid is listed as an underlying cause, what do you think they should do with that information?
Picadillo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The George Floyd jury will have to deal with an autopsy that indicated no strangulation, plus the fact he died "with Covid".
amercer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I think they'll just watch the video, but that's a discussion for a different board.
ORAggieFan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
eidetic78 said:

BusterAg said:

Levitt, nobel proze data scientist, has a good point on the fact that the death rate reports that we are seeing are unreliable because of how COVID deaths are being recorded.

The fact that the CDC is reporting everyone that dies with COVID as a COVID death, whether or not the virus was a contributing factor, is EXTREMELY troubling. Add in the factor that a lot of the people dying WITH COVID were extremely vulnerable, and might have died anyway, and I just don't trust the data at all.

I am interested if anyone has seen any analysis that tries to work out this difference?

Let's set aside anecdote cases of younger people who went into a cytokine storm and died expectantly. Those cases happened and are happening. That is bad. But, it's tough to tell what % of the cases were actually like this, as opposed to dying with a gunshot would while having COVID.

For example, have we seen any reporting on the number of people that died while on ventilators compared to overall cases? The number of people that died due to upper respiratory infections that had COVID compared to average deaths of upper respiratory infections?
You can view the CDC's own advice here

I'd be interested to see a single gunshot wound death that has covid listed as an underlying cause. Assuming this isn't some scenario where they were in the hospital recovering from a GSW, contracted covid there, and died. This just seems like hyperbole otherwise.

Deaths are reported as having an immediate cause followed by any underlying causes and any comorbidities. It's up to the individual physician to determine, for any given covid positive patient that dies, whether that disease contributed to their death. If that's their opinion, then it will be listed as an underlying cause.

If someone is 115 years old, has every comorbidity under the sun, contracts covid and dies from respiratory failure, how should that be reported?

The CDC only reports data supplied to them by the states. If covid is listed as an underlying cause, what do you think they should do with that information?

Many weeks ago authorities in Seattle said at least five of their covid attributed deaths were positive tests but died later due to gunshot. At that time (and I know if no change) anyone in the system that tested positive and at some point died was counted. Not sure if that has changed but if not it should.
BusterAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
According to this video from April, the Director of the Illinois Department of Public Health agrees with the above poster:
Quote:

If you were in hospice and had already been given a few weeks to live, and then you also were found to have COVID, that would be counted as a COVID death. It means technically even if you died of a clear alternate cause, but you had COVID at the same time, it's still listed as a COVID death. So, everyone who's listed as a COVID death doesn't mean that that was the cause of the death, but they had COVID at the time of the death

Source: https://week.com/2020/04/20/idph-director-explains-how-covid-deaths-are-classified/
I have seen no communication by the CDC that this has changed, nor have I seen any discussion about how past death rate data has been adjusted if there was a change in the way the data is being collected.

This is all a giant data sham. The only analysis that I have seen that I trust is the Financial Times article that analyzed deaths in the US that were abnormally high compared to prior years. Their estimate was that there was about 120,000 additional deaths in March through May, but that we are back in the monthly normal zone in June.

If anyone has any information that addresses any change by the CDC, and how they have adjusted death counts based on those changes, I would love to see it.
It takes a special kind of brainwashed useful idiot to politically defend government fraud, waste, and abuse.
PJYoung
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
https://ourworldindata.org/excess-mortality-covid

Quote:

The chart below uses data from EuroMOMO, a network of epidemiologists who collect weekly reports on deaths from all causes in 24 European countries, covering 350m people. These figures show that, compared with a historical baseline of 2009-19, Europe has suffered some deadly flu seasons since 2016 but that the death toll this year from covid-19 is far greater. Overall, the number of excess deaths across the continent since March is about 170,000. Though most of those victims have been older than 65, the number of deaths among Europeans aged 45-64 was 40% higher than usual in early April.
Thomas Ford 91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The CDC keeps influenza and pneumonia data here:

Pneumonia and Influenza Mortality Surveillance from the National Center for Health Statistics Mortality Surveillance System

If you download the spreadsheets and compare data from this season and the last bad pneumonia season (2017-2018), you'll find that there are roughly 45,000-50,000 more "pneumonia" deaths from March - June than other years.

I don't think those count in the Covid numbers.
Governor
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I threw this together based on these two sources:

CDC Excess Death by Covid:
Produces a High and Low bound of expected deaths per week based on historical averages, then compares that to the 2020 death count (the have both a weighted and unweighted view) The weighted numbers takes into account reporting lags and incompleteness, you can read methodology in the report.

State Reported Deaths

HotardAg07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
You can quite easily find the all cause mortality data from the national center for health statistics in the US and see that as a country we are up 8-10% in all cause mortality up to the end of May compared to any recent year in the last decade. I've actually downloaded and analyzed it myself and posted the results here before, I don't care to do it again.

The data collection is imperfect, but the virus is real. We are here to learn from doctors on the front lines and they all tell us the virus is real and worth being vigilant to avoid - wear masks, wash hands, social distance, etc.
Keegan99
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It's 5%, not 8-10%.

https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid19/index.htm

That translates to about 67k excess deaths out of 1.39MM.
BiochemAg97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Complete Idiot said:

BusterAg said:

Quote:

Quote:

A COVID test can prove, reasonably, whether or not they had COVID and symptoms presented prior to death could reasonably be assigned as a respiratory issue.

I would much more prefer to rely on the Dr.'s professional opinion than just assume cause of death is COVID.

Maybe you capture both statistics? 1) Did the patient have COVID? 2) Does the Dr., in his professional opinion, believe COVID was the cause of death or a major contributing factor?

We don't have data set #2. We have to assume that data set #1 is higher than data set #2, because we know that there are at least some gunshot wound cases that got counted as COVID deaths. I'm just looking for analysis from clever data scientists that are looking at ways to estimate data set #2.
I think we do have the data you are referring to, but whether or not you or I should believe I guess is up for debate or opinion . This is where the CDC keeps its flu/Covid/Pneumonia data, as well as death burden compared to expected deaths (historically determined I guess): https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid19/index.htm

I also think doctors/facilities do have to complete a death report, and they do have to indicate a cause of death. Sometimes these reports can lag and not be taken into account in a timely fashion.

I have to admit when you mention "gunshot wounds counted as Covid deaths" I kind of tune out, it's hard to find a valid news source that would support that position in any statistically significant way. Of the 130K US deaths attributed to COVID, how many also had a gunshot wound?
Hard to tell how big a % it is, but it is real. A couple of the links suggest there is about a 3% error in Washington state and that those 3% may be reclassified in the future (a year from now). Basically, the current numbers are a quick count... anyone with a positive test, but revisions will make the numbers more reliable some time in the future (2021).

State epidemiologists: COVID-19-related deaths likely being ...komonews.com news local state-epidemiologists-c...

https://mynorthwest.com/1889564/rantz-gun-shot-victims-washington-coronavirus-deaths/

https://www.kxly.com/three-percent-of-washingtons-reported-covid-19-deaths-may-be-inaccurate/
Post removed:
by user
cav14
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If you want to argue this, then the same is true with the death statistics on the regular flu (or nearly any other illness).
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.