Have 29 y/o teetering on vent sick as hell. Plus numerous 30-50 y/os. Community spread.
Aggie95 said:
any contract tracing to see where they may have picked it up?
Bars, protests, etc?
Infection_Ag11 said:
I've seen over 30 new COVID consults this week alone. I can recite my note template word for word by heart at this point.
SnyderAg02 said:
Are the younger patients ones you would consider metabolically healthy?
DadHammer said:Infection_Ag11 said:
I've seen over 30 new COVID consults this week alone. I can recite my note template word for word by heart at this point.
How are you keeping yourself safe seeing that many sick people?
CardiffGiant said:
I'm curious of the overall health and demographic of the people who are the most sick. At this point I'm trying to figure out how I might do when I catch this. Notice I said when because it seems like that's where we are headed. Don't take that as I'm not taking this seriously either. I'm doing the things I'm supposed to do but I'm still living my life by going to my sons baseball games, playing golf etc.
My question is I'm a 41 y/o white male in generally good health. By medical standards I'm considered obese but I think most people who see me would think I've just got a few extra lb's. I'm 5'11" and weight ~205lbs. I know there is no exact way to tell but statistically how at risk am I of having a major problem?
DadHammer said:Infection_Ag11 said:
I've seen over 30 new COVID consults this week alone. I can recite my note template word for word by heart at this point.
How are you keeping yourself safe seeing that many sick people?
Bonfired said:
BMI needs to be used in conjunction with other measures...it is possible to be a very fit 5'11", 205# person, yet the BMI chart classifies that as very close to obese. The word itself implies slovenly and out of shape, even if it is a medical definition (kind of like idiot and moron used to be in psychology).
When I hear that obesity is a factor, I am guessing that it is probably referring to someone who is obviously not in good physical shape.
Keegan99 said:
The CDC ethnicity data is shocking.
I would never have anticipated a multiplier of roughly 5x between whites and Hispanics and blacks. Even 2x would be considerable.
Goodbull_19 said:SnyderAg02 said:
Are the younger patients ones you would consider metabolically healthy?
That's my big question. Are any of these young people that are very sick at all metabolically healthy?
Infection_Ag11 said:Bonfired said:
BMI needs to be used in conjunction with other measures...it is possible to be a very fit 5'11", 205# person, yet the BMI chart classifies that as very close to obese. The word itself implies slovenly and out of shape, even if it is a medical definition (kind of like idiot and moron used to be in psychology).
When I hear that obesity is a factor, I am guessing that it is probably referring to someone who is obviously not in good physical shape.
BMI is a reliable metric of medical risk related to excess weight in humans with anything resembling a normal body fat to muscle mass ratio. The kind of people who it doesn't work well for are those >2 standard deviations above or below average height, those with extremely high muscle mass and those with extremely low body fat. We're generally talking about elite level athletes and dedicated resistance training groups.
For the average American male, 5'11", 205 makes you about 30 pounds overweight. The issue is not so much with BMI but rather Americans have developed such a skewed idea of what a normal human body looks like. Nearly everyone under 6 feet and over 200 pounds was viewed as unusual and obviously overweight for all of human history prior to the mid-20th century western world. Go look at the average height/weight charts of American and Western European troops from WW1 and WW2 and prepare to be shocked.
Old movies too - Jimmy Stewart, Cary Grant - all those people are so thin.94chem said:Infection_Ag11 said:Bonfired said:
BMI needs to be used in conjunction with other measures...it is possible to be a very fit 5'11", 205# person, yet the BMI chart classifies that as very close to obese. The word itself implies slovenly and out of shape, even if it is a medical definition (kind of like idiot and moron used to be in psychology).
When I hear that obesity is a factor, I am guessing that it is probably referring to someone who is obviously not in good physical shape.
BMI is a reliable metric of medical risk related to excess weight in humans with anything resembling a normal body fat to muscle mass ratio. The kind of people who it doesn't work well for are those >2 standard deviations above or below average height, those with extremely high muscle mass and those with extremely low body fat. We're generally talking about elite level athletes and dedicated resistance training groups.
For the average American male, 5'11", 205 makes you about 30 pounds overweight. The issue is not so much with BMI but rather Americans have developed such a skewed idea of what a normal human body looks like. Nearly everyone under 6 feet and over 200 pounds was viewed as unusual and obviously overweight for all of human history prior to the mid-20th century western world. Go look at the average height/weight charts of American and Western European troops from WW1 and WW2 and prepare to be shocked.
Heck, just watch news footage from the 1970's. Pedestrians looked like rails.
why do you say that?Infection_Ag11 said:Keegan99 said:
The CDC ethnicity data is shocking.
I would never have anticipated a multiplier of roughly 5x between whites and Hispanics and blacks. Even 2x would be considerable.
It was entirely predictable from an epidemiology standpoint.
I remember when they did that reboot of The Alamo near here, they had a hard time finding enough Hispanics to be extras in the movie, as soldiers...dudes who looked like they were skinny enough to have marched from Mexico City to San Antonio. They probably have the same issue with WW movies for today.Infection_Ag11 said:Bonfired said:
BMI needs to be used in conjunction with other measures...it is possible to be a very fit 5'11", 205# person, yet the BMI chart classifies that as very close to obese. The word itself implies slovenly and out of shape, even if it is a medical definition (kind of like idiot and moron used to be in psychology).
When I hear that obesity is a factor, I am guessing that it is probably referring to someone who is obviously not in good physical shape.
BMI is a reliable metric of medical risk related to excess weight in humans with anything resembling a normal body fat to muscle mass ratio. The kind of people who it doesn't work well for are those >2 standard deviations above or below average height, those with extremely high muscle mass and those with extremely low body fat. We're generally talking about elite level athletes and dedicated resistance training groups.
For the average American male, 5'11", 205 makes you about 30 pounds overweight. The issue is not so much with BMI but rather Americans have developed such a skewed idea of what a normal human body looks like. Nearly everyone under 6 feet and over 200 pounds was viewed as unusual and obviously overweight for all of human history prior to the mid-20th century western world. Go look at the average height/weight charts of American and Western European troops from WW1 and WW2 and prepare to be shocked.
there has to be something. Right? It cannot be random chance that drives viral load in one individual versus the next.Marcus Aurelius said:
Just saw 29, 33, 33 y/os. Sick. No cormorbids. No one is immune.
Infection_Ag11 said:Bonfired said:
BMI needs to be used in conjunction with other measures...it is possible to be a very fit 5'11", 205# person, yet the BMI chart classifies that as very close to obese. The word itself implies slovenly and out of shape, even if it is a medical definition (kind of like idiot and moron used to be in psychology).
When I hear that obesity is a factor, I am guessing that it is probably referring to someone who is obviously not in good physical shape.
BMI is a reliable metric of medical risk related to excess weight in humans with anything resembling a normal body fat to muscle mass ratio. The kind of people who it doesn't work well for are those >2 standard deviations above or below average height, those with extremely high muscle mass and those with extremely low body fat. We're generally talking about elite level athletes and dedicated resistance training groups.
For the average American male, 5'11", 205 makes you about 30 pounds overweight. The issue is not so much with BMI but rather Americans have developed such a skewed idea of what a normal human body looks like. Nearly everyone under 6 feet and over 200 pounds was viewed as unusual and obviously overweight for all of human history prior to the mid-20th century western world. Go look at the average height/weight charts of American and Western European troops from WW1 and WW2 and prepare to be shocked.
One getting CVP so far. O+.KlinkerAg11 said:
A blood type?
Goodbull_19 said:Infection_Ag11 said:Bonfired said:
BMI needs to be used in conjunction with other measures...it is possible to be a very fit 5'11", 205# person, yet the BMI chart classifies that as very close to obese. The word itself implies slovenly and out of shape, even if it is a medical definition (kind of like idiot and moron used to be in psychology).
When I hear that obesity is a factor, I am guessing that it is probably referring to someone who is obviously not in good physical shape.
BMI is a reliable metric of medical risk related to excess weight in humans with anything resembling a normal body fat to muscle mass ratio. The kind of people who it doesn't work well for are those >2 standard deviations above or below average height, those with extremely high muscle mass and those with extremely low body fat. We're generally talking about elite level athletes and dedicated resistance training groups.
For the average American male, 5'11", 205 makes you about 30 pounds overweight. The issue is not so much with BMI but rather Americans have developed such a skewed idea of what a normal human body looks like. Nearly everyone under 6 feet and over 200 pounds was viewed as unusual and obviously overweight for all of human history prior to the mid-20th century western world. Go look at the average height/weight charts of American and Western European troops from WW1 and WW2 and prepare to be shocked.
The average American (male and female) has put on 30 lbs since 1960.
I am 6'1" and have weighed between 205-215 for most of my adult life. I considered myself "bigger built" but few would have described me as fat.
I have in the last 3 months lost 30 lbs. Now 6'1" and finally truly healthy.
All that to say, I totally agree, our perceptions of "slightly overweight" or "normal" are so skewed
ETFan said:Goodbull_19 said:Infection_Ag11 said:Bonfired said:
BMI needs to be used in conjunction with other measures...it is possible to be a very fit 5'11", 205# person, yet the BMI chart classifies that as very close to obese. The word itself implies slovenly and out of shape, even if it is a medical definition (kind of like idiot and moron used to be in psychology).
When I hear that obesity is a factor, I am guessing that it is probably referring to someone who is obviously not in good physical shape.
BMI is a reliable metric of medical risk related to excess weight in humans with anything resembling a normal body fat to muscle mass ratio. The kind of people who it doesn't work well for are those >2 standard deviations above or below average height, those with extremely high muscle mass and those with extremely low body fat. We're generally talking about elite level athletes and dedicated resistance training groups.
For the average American male, 5'11", 205 makes you about 30 pounds overweight. The issue is not so much with BMI but rather Americans have developed such a skewed idea of what a normal human body looks like. Nearly everyone under 6 feet and over 200 pounds was viewed as unusual and obviously overweight for all of human history prior to the mid-20th century western world. Go look at the average height/weight charts of American and Western European troops from WW1 and WW2 and prepare to be shocked.
The average American (male and female) has put on 30 lbs since 1960.
I am 6'1" and have weighed between 205-215 for most of my adult life. I considered myself "bigger built" but few would have described me as fat.
I have in the last 3 months lost 30 lbs. Now 6'1" and finally truly healthy.
All that to say, I totally agree, our perceptions of "slightly overweight" or "normal" are so skewed
Exact same here. I've lost a considerable amount of weight since COVID started (intentionally) and have a normal bmi now (just barely). The majority of my friends who hear my stats or see me think i'm underweight, too skinny, "you need to stop running", etc.
It's wild, scary, and sad how twisted society's view of 'healthy' has become.
Ragoo said:why do you say that?Infection_Ag11 said:Keegan99 said:
The CDC ethnicity data is shocking.
I would never have anticipated a multiplier of roughly 5x between whites and Hispanics and blacks. Even 2x would be considerable.
It was entirely predictable from an epidemiology standpoint.