Comparing influenza deaths with covid deaths

3,656 Views | 26 Replies | Last: 5 yr ago by Picadillo
eric76
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I just thought about it when reading a post on the Politics board that reminded me of something -- the number of people killed by the flu each year is actually quite small. The vast majority of all flu deaths are actually from opportunistic infections, not the flu.

Years ago, I was told that nobody dies from the flu itself, but I think that is wrong, but not by much. Most people die from opportunistic infections that strike when their immunity has been reduced from the flu.

Supposedly, many doctors have never seen someone die from the flu. How many doctors here have seen patients die from the flu that weren't actually from opportunistic infections?

There are no requirements to report flu deaths apart from deaths from opportunistic infections such as pneumonia. When we see that xx,000 people died from the flu this year, nearly all of those were from opportunistic infections, not the flu.

On the other hand, my impression is that most of the covid-19 deaths are directly from the covid-19, not from other causes.
Thomas Ford 91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The CDC requires data be collected and reported for Influenza-like illnesses, including influenza and pneumonia. In the 2019-2020 season, influenza was the cause of death for 9,169 people. That is separate from pneumonia. 183,683 persons died of pneumonia in the 2019-2020 season.

plain_o_llama
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Do you have a link to this 9,169 value. I don't remember in recent years ever seeing it broken out. The CDC seems to always report the model driven Influenza burden number or Influenza and Pneumonia deaths together.
agforlife97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
eric76
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
agforlife97 said:


So how many of the flu deaths were actually from the flu instead of from opportunistic infections?
AeroAg1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
eric76 said:

agforlife97 said:


So how many of the flu deaths were actually from the flu instead of from opportunistic infections?
Probably on par with Covid
eric76
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
rudy99 said:

eric76 said:

agforlife97 said:


So how many of the flu deaths were actually from the flu instead of from opportunistic infections?
Probably on par with Covid
I doubt that but cannot absolutely say it is wrong.

It would be surprising if some who have covid-19 didn't develop other infections able to develop because of the lowered immunity, but there is plenty of reason to believe that a great many of the covid-19 deaths were due to the virus itself and the body fighting that virus.
Correction
How long do you want to ignore this user?
What counts as a "flu death" according to this chart:

Any death certificate which lists one of the following diagnostic codes:

  • J09 Influenza due to certain identified influenza viruses
  • J10 Influenza due to other identified influenza virus
  • J11 Influenza due to unidentified influenza virus
  • J12 Viral pneumonia, not elsewhere classified
  • J13 Pneumonia due to Streptococcus pneumoniae
  • J14 Pneumonia due to Hemophilus influenzae
  • J15 Bacterial pneumonia, not elsewhere classified
  • J16 Pneumonia due to other infectious organisms, not elsewhere classified
  • J17 Pneumonia in diseases classified elsewhere
  • J18 Pneumonia, unspecified organism

https://www.icd10data.com/ICD10CM/Codes/J00-J99/J09-J18
Thomas Ford 91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
plain_o_llama said:

Do you have a link to this 9,169 value. I don't remember in recent years ever seeing it broken out. The CDC seems to always report the model driven Influenza burden number or Influenza and Pneumonia deaths together.

Sorry, wandered off...

Pneumonia and Influenza Mortality Surveillance from the National Center for Health Statistics Mortality Surveillance System

You can download spreadsheets and sum columns for this information.
MaxPower
How long do you want to ignore this user?
eric76 said:

agforlife97 said:


So how many of the flu deaths were actually from the flu instead of from opportunistic infections?
Are those numbers accurate? I think total deaths are. However, the mortality rate makes no sense. It says in 2019 roughly 31k positive tests yet 10k deaths. There's no way 1/3 of those who test positive with the flu die and wouldn't that death rate be 30+%?
Thomas Ford 91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
If you compare 2019-2020 pneumonia season to earlier seasons, the numbers always start to drop in Week 8. This looked like a normal pneumonia season until Week 9. Unprecedented deaths after that. Roughly 45,000-50,000 more "pneumonia" deaths in the US from March through June than a bad pneumonia year (2017-2018 for example).

I don't think these excess pneumonia deaths are counted in the Covid-19 deaths.
Thomas Ford 91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
MaxPower said:

eric76 said:

agforlife97 said:


So how many of the flu deaths were actually from the flu instead of from opportunistic infections?
Are those numbers accurate? I think total deaths are. However, the mortality rate makes no sense. It says in 2019 roughly 31k positive tests yet 10k deaths. There's no way 1/3 of those who test positive with the flu die and wouldn't that death rate be 30+%?
Those numbers are totally wrong. According to the CDC, in the 2018-2019 influenza season, 7,174 people died NATIONWIDE,
WorthAg95
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Thomas Ford 91 said:

MaxPower said:

eric76 said:

agforlife97 said:


So how many of the flu deaths were actually from the flu instead of from opportunistic infections?
Are those numbers accurate? I think total deaths are. However, the mortality rate makes no sense. It says in 2019 roughly 31k positive tests yet 10k deaths. There's no way 1/3 of those who test positive with the flu die and wouldn't that death rate be 30+%?
Those numbers are totally wrong. According to the CDC, in the 2018-2019 influenza season, 7,174 people died NATIONWIDE,
https://www.dshs.state.tx.us/IDCU/disease/influenza/surveillance/2019.aspx
Open up the pdf and scroll down to page 5
terradactylexpress
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Unless you are young, immune compromised or old would you even get a flu test?

When our baby was sick (2ish) the doc said that they usually don't bother with the flu test due to accuracy and just prescribed Tamiflu
Thomas Ford 91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
WorthAg95 said:

Thomas Ford 91 said:

MaxPower said:

eric76 said:

agforlife97 said:


So how many of the flu deaths were actually from the flu instead of from opportunistic infections?
Are those numbers accurate? I think total deaths are. However, the mortality rate makes no sense. It says in 2019 roughly 31k positive tests yet 10k deaths. There's no way 1/3 of those who test positive with the flu die and wouldn't that death rate be 30+%?
Those numbers are totally wrong. According to the CDC, in the 2018-2019 influenza season, 7,174 people died NATIONWIDE,
https://www.dshs.state.tx.us/IDCU/disease/influenza/surveillance/2019.aspx
Open up the pdf and scroll down to page 5

The tweet says "Flu". The chart on page 5 is "P&I", which is "Pneumonia & Influenza". Many more deaths when you combine them (175,756 nationwide).
eric76
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
MaxPower said:

eric76 said:

agforlife97 said:


So how many of the flu deaths were actually from the flu instead of from opportunistic infections?
Are those numbers accurate? I think total deaths are. However, the mortality rate makes no sense. It says in 2019 roughly 31k positive tests yet 10k deaths. There's no way 1/3 of those who test positive with the flu die and wouldn't that death rate be 30+%?
I've had what appeared to be the flu several times but they never have actually tested to make sure that was what I had. It's quite possible that they don't actually test for the flu unless you are really sick.
bigtruckguy3500
How long do you want to ignore this user?
terradactylexpress said:

Unless you are young, immune compromised or old would you even get a flu test?

When our baby was sick (2ish) the doc said that they usually don't bother with the flu test due to accuracy and just prescribed Tamiflu
Yup. If you have a flu like illness during flu season, you are assumed to have the flu. Most people don't test unless they want to appease a patient's desire to spend more money, or they don't want to prescribe tamiflu without a test.
Dr. Not Yet Dr. Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
People really need to stop reposting that chart. Those numbers are not just influenza deaths, they include ALL PNEUMONIA deaths, as well, which is a very common cause of death independent of influenza, in fact, significantly more common cause. If those numbers were to be believed, the entire state of Texas would have 1/3rd of the entire country's deaths from flu in 18-19, which should obviously make anyone skeptical.
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
AustinAg2K
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It's also my understanding that the 30,000-60,000 people they say die each year from the flu aren't from actual positive tests, but rather an approximation based off of people's symptoms (and as mentioned above, it's whenever the flu was a contributing cause and not necessarily the actual cause). You can't take those assumed to have the flu, and compare it those who actually tested positive for covid. You need to either compare only those who tested positive (which would drastically lower the number of flu deaths) or compare those who are presumed to have the disease (which would greatly raise the number of covid deaths).

I do believe our reaction to this is greatly overblown, but the way people just post numbers without validating and understanding them really bothers me.
zburks2007
How long do you want to ignore this user?
tysker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Dr. Not Yet Dr. Ag said:

People really need to stop reposting that chart. Those numbers are not just influenza deaths, they include ALL PNEUMONIA deaths, as well, which is a very common cause of death independent of influenza, in fact, significantly more common cause. If those numbers were to be believed, the entire state of Texas would have 1/3rd of the entire country's deaths from flu in 18-19, which should obviously make anyone skeptical.
Which numbers should we be skeptical about, the TxDSHS figures or the national figures?
jpb1999
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yeah, but are t they counting pneumonia deaths, caused by COVID, in the Covid death count also?
MasterAggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

So how many of the flu deaths were actually from the flu instead of from opportunistic infections?
Think of the flu as the "root cause" here. If not for A then B doesn't happen.
Keegan99
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

In Texas, more than 11,000 people died from flu and its complications during the 2017-18 flu season, including 16 children, the Texas Department of State Health Services (DSHS) said.


https://www.texmed.org/Template.aspx?id=48701


Now, if we PCR tested every fatality for influenza and coded all positives as a "flu death", as we are with COVID, what would the numbers look like?
MasterAggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
He's right you know.
agforlife97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Dr. Not Yet Dr. Ag said:

People really need to stop reposting that chart. Those numbers are not just influenza deaths, they include ALL PNEUMONIA deaths, as well, which is a very common cause of death independent of influenza, in fact, significantly more common cause. If those numbers were to be believed, the entire state of Texas would have 1/3rd of the entire country's deaths from flu in 18-19, which should obviously make anyone skeptical.
So whether that graphic is misleading or not, it's really not as big a gaffe to compare covid to a bad flu year as many experts and expert jock sniffers pretend it is. The IFR for covid is likely to be in the 0.26% range when it's all said and done and maybe lower, which is in the range of a bad flu or at least a pandemic flu year like we saw in the 50's or 60's. Now yes, covid is more contagious, no question. But analogies are imperfect. The definition of analogy is "a thing which is comparable to something else in significant respects." Covid is certainly more similar to the flu than it is to say, Ebola. What else can you really compare it to? Also, the purpose of these comparisons is to put relative risk in perspective, which seems to just go over all the heads of the coronabros. No one in the US pays any mind to the flu season at all, yet thousands die each year. That's the point. We regularly flout riskier things than covid every day, things like driving or even being struck by lightning. The panic is misplaced, and either shows massive ignorance of relative risk, or simply that many people are just very fragile psychologically.
itsyourboypookie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I've never died of the flu
Picadillo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Imagine a virus so deadly you had to get tested to find out if you had it
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.