AggieFlyboy said:Not really, https://usafacts.org/visualizations/coronavirus-covid-19-spread-map/state/idaho/county/blaine-countyThe Big12Ag said:I guess it was just delayedKeegan99 said:
Another interesting "experiment".
Blaine County, Idaho burned out. It didn't get a second wave.
https://www.co.blaine.id.us/DocumentCenter/View/13171/Dashboard-11-5-2020?bidId=
The original tweet showed Blaine county new cases as completely flat while they rose to 200-400 new daily cases per million population in surrounding counties (referring to that as a"large surge") and suggested 20-25% infection rate was protecting Blaine residents.
The link I provided, and your link as well, show a rise to 330 daily new cases per million Blaine residents (there aren't a million residents but that was rare used in original tweet) which is not flat and would have been referred to as a "large surge" in quoted tweet. And, as seen in your own link, cases are clearly rising after having been flat for months and months .
Depending on the point your are trying to prove you can find some data in the world to support it, depending on timeline and geographic location selected. It's not impossible, but unlikely, that seroprevalence was "protecting" Blaine back in august but if that was true then more recent data would suggest that protection wears of. Or, more likely, 20-25% seroprevalence doesn't really provide the protection that was being suggested.