Talked about how people can be feared to make decisions not based on facts.Capitol Ag said:
I'm confused. What was the tweet?
That's exactly what's happened in many instances throughout all of this.P.U.T.U said:Talked about how people can be feared to make decisions not based on facts.Capitol Ag said:
I'm confused. What was the tweet?
beerad12man said:That's exactly what's happened in many instances throughout all of this.P.U.T.U said:Talked about how people can be feared to make decisions not based on facts.Capitol Ag said:
I'm confused. What was the tweet?
And the worst is, those same types will never admit they are wrong. They'll just double down.
people would have still died, they just would have died without the covid virus inside them.AgE Doc said:So does this graph explain the 10,000+ Texans that died in July and August?EyeBalz said:
I had a high level hospital adminitrator in the metroplex send me this link today. He's an Ag.
I defer judgment on its contents to those with greater expertise than I.
If we tested less, would less die or more?
I also like the "Gain-amplified data" to manipulate the image to prove their point.2PacShakur said:
What metric is "relative to April 16" and why isn't April 16 relative to April 16? Also, there are 3 things plotted (maybe 4 with the yellow line on the bottom) but only 2 scales? Call me skeptical.
Pretty much every measure of this has been manipulated by the government as a scare tactic.AgE Doc said:So does this graph explain the 10,000+ Texans that died in July and August?EyeBalz said:
I had a high level hospital adminitrator in the metroplex send me this link today. He's an Ag.
I defer judgment on its contents to those with greater expertise than I.
If we tested less, would less die or more?
94chem said:
Interesting analysis, but how is the hospitalization spike at TMC "gain amplified data?"
Can somebody cite the actual definition of the deaths in the excess death chart?ORAggieFan said:
I believe this graph includes all "natural cause deaths" which does include covid and flu.
culdeus said:94chem said:
Interesting analysis, but how is the hospitalization spike at TMC "gain amplified data?"
Hospital data is probably the most reliable data and would not have this effect short of a hospital over admitting.
Valid question and I often struggle with a lot of what EthicalSkeptic posts, but the top right says Covid-19 and all other natural causes. I believe that is all deaths outside of accidental, homicide, suicide, etc.buffalo chip said:Can somebody cite the actual definition of the deaths in the excess death chart?ORAggieFan said:
I believe this graph includes all "natural cause deaths" which does include covid and flu.
ORA and Buster have defined it differently...
nortex97 said:
It's also not that dangerous a bug.
How can you honestly make statements like this after seeing the spike in hospitalizations in Houston before the "oh **** people put your masks on, be more responsible, stop gathering at bars like idiots" response kicked in?Catag94 said:nortex97 said:
It's also not that dangerous a bug.
It is difficult to justify the restrictions, and fear driven responses to COVID-19 with respect to NCAA competitions and band performances, etc. when you think about the ages of the participants and look at this chart.
In fact, with the sample size we now have, I'd suggest this charts illustrates how ridiculous the general response to this virus has been since the beginning.
nortex97 said:
It's also not that dangerous a bug.
You did not read that properly. Your statement is wrong. Quit stating it. It does no one any good to say wrong things.Catag94 said:
The CDC has recently reported that on 6% of those 190k deaths were sticky SARS-COV 2. The other 94% included "Comorbid factors". Many of these people could/would have died from catching a cold or the flu. No doubt the virus accelerated deaths of many people, but, there is likely also a high percentage of deaths labeled COVID-19 that aren't.
