Resurgence in France

10,024 Views | 53 Replies | Last: 5 yr ago by agforlife97
wessimo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG

https://www.bbc.com/news/amp/world-europe-53954562

They were supposed to be over the hump. What gives?
wessimo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Spain also trending up.

DCAggie13y
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Have they started to ease restrictions?
BANA89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
France probably let them Covid walk right in over the border without putting up a fight.
BANA Class of '86/'89 - Living in Aggieland!
Not a Bot
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Curious if these are taking place in different regions that dodged the original spike. That seems to be what happened in the US.
AggieFlyboy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Infections rising in areas that were spared the first time. Same thing that happened here. This too shall pass
Ragoo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Moxley said:

Curious if these are taking place in different regions that dodged the original spike. That seems to be what happened in the US.
this
Bruce Almighty
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
There was always going to be a second wave.
Ragoo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Repositioning of first wave
AgResearch
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Bruce Almighty said:

There was always going to be a second wave.
and 3rd and 4th until we all get it as it spreads to different geographic regions.
Picadillo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
No word on if there's been any increased testing, but there's this


Quote:

Despite the sharp rise, hospital numbers and daily deaths were relatively stable, as young people less vulnerable to the disease make up most of the new infections, the ministry said.


amercer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
All of France goes on vacation for the month of August. Not super surprising that a couple weeks later cases would be on the rise.

I have some colleagues in France and Switzerland. They really let up on the social distancing and other measures this summer.
EyeBalz
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I don't care anymore.

We just need to go back to an almost complete pre-Covid normal, no masks, 100% capacity at restaurants but maybe something less for sports games , maybe restrict bars and nightclubs, and have high risk people stay home and/or wear N95 masks.


The goal should always be to not overwhelm our hospitals while protecting the very vulnerable, not to minimize total infections until a vaccine is available.

We are killing our the businesses that fuel our economy and wrecking our kids' Aggie college experience.

No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
KlinkerAg11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Lockdowns clearly worked for not overwhelming the hospitals in areas that didn't already have an outbreak when they locked down.

This issue is lockdown is a tool, and it's temporary. You can't keep using it forever.

It's like it worked once and people want to keep using it when it clearly is illogical.
CardiffGiant
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
China released coronavirus 2.0
Ol_Ag_02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Who cares. Stop being scared. Live your life.
Ol_Ag_02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
EyeBalz said:

I don't care anymore.

We just need to go back to an almost complete pre-Covid normal, no masks, 100% capacity at restaurants but maybe something less for sports games , maybe restrict bars and nightclubs, and have high risk people stay home and/or wear N95 masks.


The goal should always be to not overwhelm our hospitals while protecting the very vulnerable, not to minimize total infections until a vaccine is available.

We are killing our the businesses that fuel our economy and wrecking our kids' Aggie college experience.




Congrats on winning the most flair on Texags award. Also, you post rocks.
BeeAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ol_Ag_02 said:

Who cares. Stop being scared. Live your life.


Would love too. Now get the state government to let me.
Sisyphus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

We just need to go back to an almost complete pre-Covid normal, no masks, 100% capacity at restaurants but maybe something less for sports games , maybe restrict bars and nightclubs, and have high risk people stay home and/or wear N95 masks.


The goal should always be to not overwhelm our hospitals while protecting the very vulnerable, not to minimize total infections until a vaccine is available.
I'm trying to understand this viewpoint

After the restrictions started to roll back (but not as far as you're proposing), Texas started to approach hospital capacity in a lot of places (like Harris Country and the RGV). If we went back to "an almost complete pre-Covid normal, no masks, 100% capacity at restaurants" what keeps us from seeing the same thing? Is it that we're closer to herd immunity? Or are you saying we should open up and then pull back again when the numbers start to go up again? Something else?
P.U.T.U
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
During their peak France saw 1,000+ a day dying, now they averaging less than 20 a day for the past month. By percentage the serious cases is less than 1%, Worldmeter list it as zero. While they may be getting another surge it is likely the younger crowd that is not getting very sick.
DadHammer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Remember, the more that get infected and recover the less people there are to spread the virus.

The only way to the end this is herd immunity. Its a respiratory virus, lockdowns do nothing but prolong the illness timeline and kill the economy and cause massive other issues.

The damage being done to reduce spread is way worse than anything covid could or will ever do long term.



sands
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
While they are experiencing an increase in infections, it appears they are still have a relativity low death rate. Especially compared to their original peak infection/death rates. Not sure about hospitalizations.

https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/spain/
https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/france/
Bruce Almighty
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Is that the genetic sequencing for Corona?
Sisyphus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The confirmed cases in Texas are around 640K and the population is almost 30M. That's only 2% of the population that has had it. Even if you assume that the actual number is 5X greater than the confirmed number, that's still only 10%. Based on that, I would think that we would see numbers go up almost as fast as before. The hospitals would exceed capacity and it would be a year or more before it slowed down. With hospitals impacted, the case fatality rate would shoot up and a lot more people would die.

I think I may be misunderstanding what you're advocating (or misinterpreting the numbers).
cone
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
a year or more?

lolwut
Sisyphus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Good point. A year or more is probably too long for impacted hospitals but if it took us 6 months to go through less than 10 % of the population, it would take 3 years to get to only 60% at that rate. I see that if we opened up completely, we'd get to herd immunity faster than that, but we would still have to go through that period where the hospitals are impacted unless I'm missing something.

What is that something? Or are people just thinking that going through that rough period of high death rates is preferable?
NASAg03
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sisyphus said:

Quote:

We just need to go back to an almost complete pre-Covid normal, no masks, 100% capacity at restaurants but maybe something less for sports games , maybe restrict bars and nightclubs, and have high risk people stay home and/or wear N95 masks.


The goal should always be to not overwhelm our hospitals while protecting the very vulnerable, not to minimize total infections until a vaccine is available.
I'm trying to understand this viewpoint

After the restrictions started to roll back (but not as far as you're proposing), Texas started to approach hospital capacity in a lot of places (like Harris Country and the RGV). If we went back to "an almost complete pre-Covid normal, no masks, 100% capacity at restaurants" what keeps us from seeing the same thing? Is it that we're closer to herd immunity? Or are you saying we should open up and then pull back again when the numbers start to go up again? Something else?

The large jump in cases we saw in Texas (and all southern states) was due to the seasonal nature of the virus, not the opening. Compare to California, which was way more restricted than Texas to Florida, but still had same trend.
Mike Shaw - Class of '03
Sisyphus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I agree that most coronaviruses are seasonal but they are worse in the winter not the summer. That would suggest that the seasonality aspect would make things worse than in the summer if we were to open up all the way now.

California's surge was about half of Texas on a per-capita basis (from eye-balling the charts here: https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/us/coronavirus-us-cases.html?action=click&module=Top%20Stories&pgtype=Homepage, go down to the "where cases are decreasing" section) and places like the Bay Area where people complied with the restrictions had much smaller surges than places where they didn't, like the Central Valley.

(edit to take out an accidental emoji)
We fixed the keg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BANA89 said:

France probably let them Covid walk right in over the border without putting up a fight.
Vintage Rifle for Sale: French Military issue Fusil MAS36 World War II rifle. Never been fired, only dropped once. $500.00 or best offer.
NASAg03
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sisyphus said:

I agree that most coronaviruses are seasonal but they are worse in the winter not the summer. That would suggest that the seasonality aspect would make things worse than in the summer if we were to open up all the way now.

California's surge was about half of Texas on a per-capita basis (from eye-balling the charts here: https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/us/coronavirus-us-cases.html?action=click&module=Top%20Stories&pgtype=Homepage, go down to the "where cases are decreasing" section) and places like the Bay Area where people complied with the restrictions had much smaller surges than places where they didn't, like the Central Valley.

(edit to take out an accidental emoji)


Even so you have to admit latitude and climate play a huge part in how this spreads. Houston is a large international city, high population density, and very social in March. Yet they didn't see the high spread until months after many similar northern cities did.
Mike Shaw - Class of '03
DadHammer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Sisyfuss

What's interesting is if you look at France and Spain they are both having big spikes but both their death rates are very very low. Especially compared to the initial hit. We may find that there is a set of people that are going to be really hurt by this virus and the rest will not. Lockdowns cannot stop the spread because you can't stay in them. Look at the horrible damage they are causing world wide when smart countries like Sweden let in run, should have protected elder homes better, but they are now looking very good now and their economy hasn't been hit near as bad as it's neighbors.

Time will tell. Hopefully with colleges and schools open the younger can gain immunity quicker and we can get over this faster now.
Complete Idiot
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I am sure this second spike is explained by "human behaviors dont matter", "masks dont matter", "latitude", "virus gonna virus", "20% burnout", etc.

I agree this spike isn't concerning, the virus is just finding people not previously exposed as humans are out doing the things they need and want to do. I also noticed that there is no corresponding death spike yet. I'd like to think the virus has mutated to something less deadly, or our treatments have improved as we learned more about the mechanisms of the disease, or that the majority of the most vulnerable people (to fatal outcomes) was hit in the first wave - I think any of these are possible to varying degrees. So there shouldn't be any knee jerk reactions due to the recent increase, as always if hospitalizations become unmanageable or deaths spike then perhaps they could do better targeting restrictions but the current data and past suggest these events won't occur.

I find it all very interesting, never really been big on letting catch phrases, or random tweets, or a political leaning dictate my intellectual curiosity in a novel virus pandemic. The board was interesting when more people weren't trying to spread irrational fear of the virus, or trying to deny we should do anything at all, and instead just sharing stats and studies. But as cases and impact in US has been dying off at least the fear mongers mostly left, the board is just left with the same 10 people posting ad nauseam to each other, OCD circle jerking.

One thing stated early on was that these novel virus pandemics (1918, late 50's, late 60's, 2009) usually last 10-18 months globally, we are about at 10 months and I think on the downside of incident rate and impact. Vaccines will be ready to help the vulnerable population IF the virus stays in the population with the same virulence it has now, which isn't guaranteed.
EyeBalz
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Sisyphus said:

Quote:

We just need to go back to an almost complete pre-Covid normal, no masks, 100% capacity at restaurants but maybe something less for sports games , maybe restrict bars and nightclubs, and have high risk people stay home and/or wear N95 masks.


The goal should always be to not overwhelm our hospitals while protecting the very vulnerable, not to minimize total infections until a vaccine is available.
I'm trying to understand this viewpoint

After the restrictions started to roll back (but not as far as you're proposing), Texas started to approach hospital capacity in a lot of places (like Harris Country and the RGV). If we went back to "an almost complete pre-Covid normal, no masks, 100% capacity at restaurants" what keeps us from seeing the same thing? Is it that we're closer to herd immunity? Or are you saying we should open up and then pull back again when the numbers start to go up again? Something else?

The concerned citizen in me wants to open everything back up and just take our lumps because the economic fallout from what's been shutdown so far is likely worse than the virus

The physician in me realizes that we would have to back off that statement if hospitalizations go up so much that hospitals will be overwhelmed if we don't. But I would do that on a county by county basis.

No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
Sisyphus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

Even so you have to admit latitude and climate play a huge part in how this spreads.
There's a fair amount of data that contradicts that. New Orleans was hit hard in the initial wave. LA was hit harder than the Bay Area in the initial wave and in the second surge. The Modesto area in California had really high numbers through the late summer while the Bay Area had relatively low numbers and most of the Bay Area is at the same latitude as Modesto and are about 50 miles apart. Iowan and the Dakotas are seeing big surges right now and they're at high latitudes.I see a much higher correlation with resistance to restrictions and mask wearing.

Quote:

Sweden let in run, should have protected elder homes better, but they are now looking very good now and their economy hasn't been hit near as bad as it's neighbors.
The last I saw Sweden's GDP had dropped as much as its Scandinavian neighbors but they had a death toll 10X higher. But that was months ago and I haven't really been following them. If you have a link handy showing their economy rebounding faster than their neighbors, I'd like to read it.
Quote:

One thing stated early on was that these novel virus pandemics (1918, late 50's, late 60's, 2009) usually last 10-18 months globally, we are about at 10 months and I think on the downside of incident rate and impact.

That's a good point and one that should give us hope. A virus that doesn't take its host out of circulation has a better chance of propagating so it should evolve toward innocuousness. I don't think it's at all clear that we've reached that point yet though. I worry that if we open up too much too fast we'll see death tolls rise sharply and when we do reach the point that we can open up safely, people will still have the death of their favorite aunt burned in their memory. When the government sounds the all clear, people will say, "you said that the last two times" and remain hunkered down and keeping the economy suppressed.

On the flip side, if everything is closed down, people will find clandestine ways to do their nails, drinking, gyms, etc so their won't be any way to regulate them (or collect taxes). I'm not saying don't open up at all. I'm saying open up slowly, continue encouraging masks for the time being and focus on increasing testing so no one will be surprised by an increase in hospitalizations.

(edit for typos. re-edits for fixing typos I made while fixing the first typos)
DadHammer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I don't know where you got your economic data on Sweden but they are doing way better than their neighbors. Hard examples are included in the Sweden thread if you want to look.
Page 1 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.