Ely Lilly says monoclonal antibody effective in treating COVID

1,943 Views | 7 Replies | Last: 5 yr ago by nortex97
Keegan99
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
https://www.statnews.com/2020/10/07/eli-lilly-monoclonal-antibody-cocktail-covid-19/

In the study, 112 patients received 2.8 grams of each of the antibodies, and 156 received placebo. The difference in viral load was statistically significant at day 11, unlike some doses of Lilly's single-antibody cocktail. There was also a statistically significant reduction in viral levels three days and seven days after infection.

The treatment also improved symptoms, according to a scored questionnaire, and resulted in fewer hospital and emergency room visits. Visits to the hospital or ER were made by 5.8% of patients in the placebo group, but just 0.9% of those who received the antibody combination. That difference, however, was just barely statistically significant.

...

Lilly said it anticipates it could have as many as 1 million doses of its one-antibody treatment, LY-CoV555, available in the fourth quarter of 2020, with 100,000 available this month. But for the combination therapy, just 50,000 doses will be available in the fourth quarter of 2020.

Both antibody regimens have been well-tolerated, with no serious side effects, the company said. In the single-antibody studies, there have been reactions to the infusion of the treatment, which is given intravenously, including two "serious infusion reactions," from which patients recovered.
KlinkerAg11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Would this be considered an effective treatment for covid?

If so, once its available it makes sense to get tested so you can get treated.

This plus a vaccine would signal the beginning of the end of covid-19
amercer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Logistically? No.

It's clearly not normal times, so I'm sure they will do possible, but unless you are the president it's going to be hard to get this early in disease. Unfortunately that's when it probably works. But the supply just isn't going to be there.

2,4, or 8 gram does of antibody are incredibly huge amounts (as someone who works in this field it's hard to convey just how big those are) . Scaling up production so even high risk people can just get treated after a positive test isn't going to be feasible.

Hopefully they can show benefit to later stage patients, because the supply might cover that, but the science suggests earlier is better.
KlinkerAg11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Then why get excited about it?

It seems a lot of reputable people are.
amercer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'm excited it works, because to this point nothing else has. But the logistics are hard.
KlinkerAg11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Gotcha, if the supply chain could keep up and you could get tested and get results fast I'd assume it would be a good thing.

To me this is when testing would really matter.
pootiessock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
amercer said:

Logistically? No.

It's clearly not normal times, so I'm sure they will do possible, but unless you are the president it's going to be hard to get this early in disease. Unfortunately that's when it probably works. But the supply just isn't going to be there.

2,4, or 8 gram does of antibody are incredibly huge amounts (as someone who works in this field it's hard to convey just how big those are) . Scaling up production so even high risk people can just get treated after a positive test isn't going to be feasible.

Hopefully they can show benefit to later stage patients, because the supply might cover that, but the science suggests earlier is better.


Is there even 50,000 people in the us hospitalized for rona?

Wouldn't only the old people need it?
94chem
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It's much easier to see the effect of something on 99% of a population than on 1%. This is where human intuition and creativity are way ahead of the computers.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
KlinkerAg11 said:

Would this be considered an effective treatment for covid?

If so, once its available it makes sense to get tested so you can get treated.

This plus a vaccine would signal the beginning of the end of covid-19
No, Lord Fauci has said we can never shake hands again. It can never end.
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.