I'm conflicted (vaccine related)

9,790 Views | 98 Replies | Last: 4 yr ago by ORAggieFan
beerad12man
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Look, I lean towards wanting to get as many vaccinated as possible, regardless. I wish more would come around, but.....

Everyone is acting like the science is settled that even those who have had the virus should get vaccinated. Given time, that's probably true, but for the time being it might be better for that vaccine to go in the arm of another person rather than a young person who has already had it.

If there is anyone who likely needs it the least on this planet, it's a young, healthy person who has already had the virus. Being that only 7% of adults globally have had the vaccine, maybe it would be wise to put our efforts into getting those that want it more first. Then move on from there if it's not enough and try to convince more to. Just saying(not require, just convince through science/data as to why it helps)
RF93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
What about the issue regarding how the Vaccine was rushed into emergency use without the full set of testing?

Can you guys point me to a resource that covers this topic? I've heard there are concerns the vaccine could cause long term issues like infertility and cancer. Apparently previous versions of this type of vaccine never passed the animal testing stage due to these types of complications.

Also alarming is they (gov't agencies, media, social media) have disappeared all content related to this subject and are not permitting honest conversations related to the potential dangers of an emergency use vaccine. Government literature claims no steps were skipped for the current set of covid vaccines but I don't believe that to be the case.

Thanks and Gig'em.
TXTransplant
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This is great in theory, but if you think that any vaccine allocated to TX (or any other state in the US) that goes unused today, this week, or even this month will be reallocated to countries where much lower percentages of the population have been vaccinated, I have some oceanfront property in Arizona to sell you.

Someone opting out of the vaccine here isn't going to make vaccine available to anyone anywhere else, at least not in the short term.
ORAggieFan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RF93 said:

What about the issue regarding how the Vaccine was rushed into emergency use without the full set of testing?

Can you guys point me to a resource that covers this topic? I've heard there are concerns the vaccine could cause long term issues like infertility and cancer. Apparently previous versions of this type of vaccine never passed the animal testing stage due to these types of complications.

Also alarming is they (gov't agencies, media, social media) have disappeared all content related to this subject and are not permitting honest conversations related to the potential dangers of an emergency use vaccine. Government literature claims no steps were skipped for the current set of covid vaccines but I don't believe that to be the case.

Thanks and Gig'em.

It wasn't rushed. Anyone who believes this is ignorant to how vaccines are developed.
TXTransplant
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RF93 said:

What about the issue regarding how the Vaccine was rushed into emergency use without the full set of testing?

Can you guys point me to a resource that covers this topic? I've heard there are concerns the vaccine could cause long term issues like infertility and cancer. Apparently previous versions of this type of vaccine never passed the animal testing stage due to these types of complications.

Also alarming is they (gov't agencies, media, social media) have disappeared all content related to this subject and are not permitting honest conversations related to the potential dangers of an emergency use vaccine. Government literature claims no steps were skipped for the current set of covid vaccines but I don't believe that to be the case.

Thanks and Gig'em.


These claims have all been debunked, in multiple threads in this form as well as other places on the internet. It's really not hard to find the truth, if you look in the right places.

No steps were skipped in the places clinical trial process. mRNA vaccines have been studied for over 10 years. The vaccine does not cause infertility or cancer.
fig96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I invoked the "side" comment because I have repeatedly seen the exact same sentiment expressed here in any discussion on this, most posters who are anti-mask/etc. seem to be unable to comprehend that people who are taking precautions don't necessarily agree with many actions that have been taken. There's dozens of examples all over this board.

I did read what you said, but it sure seemed like you just wanted to talk at someone. Nothing you said reflects the fact that I clearly said I don't agree with a lot of the measures taken. And yes, saying "you" a dozen times does make it sound like you're referring to the person you're responding to

Lots of people (I'd wager most) are very similar to me and don't think our response to this has been well thought out, a very small percentage of vocal people are the ones who want to continue insanely strict measures. But I suppose if anything we've learned this isn't a place where most are looking for discussion. Have a good one.

Windy City Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

I've heard there are concerns the vaccine could cause long term issues like infertility and cancer. Apparently previous versions of this type of vaccine never passed the animal testing stage due to these types of complications.
Those concerns have been addressed and debunked as misinformation both within this thread and most other places. A few quick google searches show this.

Edit - Wow . . . . .someone had almost my verbatim response a few posts earlier.
beerad12man
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TXTransplant said:

This is great in theory, but if you think that any vaccine allocated to TX (or any other state in the US) that goes unused today, this week, or even this month will be reallocated to countries where much lower percentages of the population have been vaccinated, I have some oceanfront property in Arizona to sell you.

Someone opting out of the vaccine here isn't going to make vaccine available to anyone anywhere else, at least not in the short term.
Then lower the orders to demand. IDK. They exist. Find a way to get them in the arms that want and need them most.
TXTransplant
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I suspect that such a big fraction of the vaccines is staying here in the US because the manufacturers know they will be paid for them, regardless of whether or not they get used.

I think it would would take a person like Bill Gates to step in and buy vaccine for those other countries to get their numbers up. I would't expect Pfizer and Moderna to do it out of the goodness of their hearts.

That's not to mention all the govt money that's being sent to state and local governments to operate vaccination sites.
Keller6Ag91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ranger222 said:

Until you catch one of the variants going around that is showing more severe disease outcomes.

It would be wise to boost your immune system.
I boost my immune system almost every day with exercise and vitamin supplements. Already recovered from COVID and trust my immune system to be even better prepared the next time due to the biology of T memory cells. GOD designed this immune system to work well when we haven't destroyed it through our own health and lifestyle choices.
Gig'Em and God Bless,

JB'91
Keller6Ag91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TXTransplant said:

RF93 said:

What about the issue regarding how the Vaccine was rushed into emergency use without the full set of testing?

Can you guys point me to a resource that covers this topic? I've heard there are concerns the vaccine could cause long term issues like infertility and cancer. Apparently previous versions of this type of vaccine never passed the animal testing stage due to these types of complications.

Also alarming is they (gov't agencies, media, social media) have disappeared all content related to this subject and are not permitting honest conversations related to the potential dangers of an emergency use vaccine. Government literature claims no steps were skipped for the current set of covid vaccines but I don't believe that to be the case.

Thanks and Gig'em.


These claims have all been debunked, in multiple threads in this form as well as other places on the internet. It's really not hard to find the truth, if you look in the right places.

No steps were skipped in the places clinical trial process. mRNA vaccines have been studied for over 10 years. The vaccine does not cause infertility or cancer.
Is J&J being sued for that women dying?
Gig'Em and God Bless,

JB'91
TXTransplant
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm not sure if this is a serious question or not.

1) There is no direct proof that the vaccine absolutely caused the blood clots. Woman are at higher risk for blood clots for a variety of different reasons, including smoking and hormonal birth control use. Roughly 900,000 women are affected by blood clots and 100,000 die from them every year. There have been 6 suspected cases associated with the vaccine.

2) These vaccines - like many other vaccines - are protected by the government in that you cannot sue the manufacturer if you are harmed by them. Some vaccines are covered under NVIC program, which does provide financial settlements in some cases, but the Covid vaccine is not included in the NVIC program at this time.
Ranger222
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
DallasGrad18 said:

This thread embodies the stupidity society has embraced because of covid. I haven't seen one person suggest a logical scientific reason to get vaccinated if you've had covid. In fact, all the data I've seen suggests that immunity is stronger through infection versus the vaccine. Have a spine and don't engage in nonsensical behavior because of an employer or governmental agency. The only way we move through all this covid nonsense is by people standing up to the mob and advocating for reason.

Take the mask off, invoke HIPPA privacy if your employer asks, and tell them to pound sand if they tell you to put it back on. They don't get to enforce a mask caste system. So sick of this nonsense.

Are you blind or just not read before posting? There was a scientific, peer-reviewed research article posted about the benefits of vaccination to those that have already been exposed to SARS-COV-2. Not only that, but the benefits of re-exposure to pathogens to boost the immune response has been known for DECADES, way before SARS-COV-2. To state there isn't a "logical scientific reason" to get vaccinated after a 1st dose of pathogen exposure is either naive or a troll. Either way, it shows that you shouldn't be speaking about this matter.

Here is a helpful chart if pictures are better for you. Not only does 2nd dose (or a 1st dose of vaccine for those already exposed) boost antibody titers, but your body/immune system will select for the BEST antibodies to be produced against SARS-COV-2. This should not only quickly neutralize a re-infection, but better antibodies would also prevent other variants from breaking through the immune response and causing disease.


The_Fox
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ranger222 said:

DallasGrad18 said:

This thread embodies the stupidity society has embraced because of covid. I haven't seen one person suggest a logical scientific reason to get vaccinated if you've had covid. In fact, all the data I've seen suggests that immunity is stronger through infection versus the vaccine. Have a spine and don't engage in nonsensical behavior because of an employer or governmental agency. The only way we move through all this covid nonsense is by people standing up to the mob and advocating for reason.

Take the mask off, invoke HIPPA privacy if your employer asks, and tell them to pound sand if they tell you to put it back on. They don't get to enforce a mask caste system. So sick of this nonsense.

Are you blind or just not read before posting? There was a scientific, peer-reviewed research article posted about the benefits of vaccination to those that have already been exposed to SARS-COV-2. Not only that, but the benefits of re-exposure to pathogens to boost the immune response has been known for DECADES, way before SARS-COV-2. To state there isn't a "logical scientific reason" to get vaccinated after a 1st dose of pathogen exposure is either naive or a troll. Either way, it shows that you shouldn't be speaking about this matter.

Here is a helpful chart if pictures are better for you. Not only does 2nd dose (or a 1st dose of vaccine for those already exposed) boost antibody titers, but your body/immune system will select for the BEST antibodies to be produced against SARS-COV-2. This should not only quickly neutralize a re-infection, but better antibodies would also prevent other variants from breaking through the immune response and causing disease.





Please fill in the time frames associated.
Ranger222
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
beerad12man said:

Look, I lean towards wanting to get as many vaccinated as possible, regardless. I wish more would come around, but.....

Everyone is acting like the science is settled that even those who have had the virus should get vaccinated. Given time, that's probably true, but for the time being it might be better for that vaccine to go in the arm of another person rather than a young person who has already had it.

If there is anyone who likely needs it the least on this planet, it's a young, healthy person who has already had the virus. Being that only 7% of adults globally have had the vaccine, maybe it would be wise to put our efforts into getting those that want it more first. Then move on from there if it's not enough and try to convince more to. Just saying(not require, just convince through science/data as to why it helps)

I'd agree with this back in February / early March when vaccine doses were limited. However today there is ample amounts of vaccines and distribution has reached a point in many areas (not all, but many) where you can walk up and get a shot. There is NO EXCUSE to not get vaccinated today if anyone that wants a shot can get a shot. We need to be putting as many shots in arms as possible to end this thing.

The example in all of this should be what is occurring in Israel. They've vaccinated a huge majority (almost all) of their population and COVID cases have dropped dramatically to virtually zero.





The figure above is a week old already. Yesterday Israel posted a 0.3% positivity rate, the lowest since the pandemic began.

The way we get out of this is a huge majority of the population vaccinated -- upwards of 80% or more. We have the shots, we could be done with this a month from now and everyone enjoy a great Memorial Day weekend with no worries about COVID. It just blows my mind that the people that want all COVID restrictions limited are the same that won't get a vaccine. Do they realize THEY will be the ones that continue this for everyone? The solution is so simple, so clear yet we aren't going to do it because we don't want our arm to hurt or feel crummy for a day or two. Get the shot, lets end this thing and everyone can go back to their life pre-March 2020.
dlp3719
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Get a fake vaccine card? Problem solved! You didn't get it. Everyone at the office can be mask free and not hate you.
PJYoung
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG

Quote:

The way we get out of this is a huge majority of the population vaccinated -- upwards of 80% or more. We have the shots, we could be done with this a month from now and everyone enjoy a great Memorial Day weekend with no worries about COVID. It just blows my mind that the people that want all COVID restrictions limited are the same that won't get a vaccine. Do they realize THEY will be the ones that continue this for everyone? The solution is so simple, so clear yet we aren't going to do it because we don't want our arm to hurt or feel crummy for a day or two. Get the shot, lets end this thing and everyone can go back to their life pre-March 2020.
94chem
How long do you want to ignore this user?
lunchbox said:

Quote:

I think of my 50 year old friend (through international adoption connections), father of 6, who just passed.
Just curious...are the initials of this friend "D.W."?


Yeah.
94chem,
That, sir, was the greatest post in the history of TexAgs. I salute you. -- Dough
El Chupacabra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The_Fox said:

TXTransplant said:

The refusal to get vaccinated is just the flip side of the same coin, the flip side being the people who won't let go of their security mask.

I went to lunch with three other people today. All of us are fully vaccinated (and we all know that about each other). We walked there - about 3/4 of a mile each way.

Two of us took our masks off as soon as we stepped outside and kept them off, even when we entered the restaurant.

The other two kept their masks on the entire time, except when they were putting food into their mouths. As soon as they were done eating, they put the masks back on. The only other person we came within 6 feet of the entire time was our waitress, and even she wasn't wearing a mask.

I am all for personal choice - whether it comes to vaccination or mask wearing. But, geez, it's getting hard to have a serious conversation with someone who refuses to speak to you without a mask on.

If you're still so worried that you feel the need to wear a mask why even go to lunch?

The risk of a vaccinated person spreading the virus to someone else is probably around the same order magnitude as a person being harmed by the vaccine - meaning both are so small that they shouldn't even be blips on our daily radar. But both sides are still stuck where they are on these issues.


I have zero fear of the vaccine. But I do not see the need to expend any effort in getting it.

I have zero fear of the flu, and also do not take the time to get it either.

I was vaccinated for almost everything imaginable prior to my last deployment to Iraq. Vaccinations are fine.

I am also not concerned about actually being infected by COVId.

I just want everybody ok both sides to STFU and go back to normal. Or don't, but stop including me in your paranoia.


We could be friends.
TXTransplant
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The_Fox said:

TXTransplant said:

The refusal to get vaccinated is just the flip side of the same coin, the flip side being the people who won't let go of their security mask.

I went to lunch with three other people today. All of us are fully vaccinated (and we all know that about each other). We walked there - about 3/4 of a mile each way.

Two of us took our masks off as soon as we stepped outside and kept them off, even when we entered the restaurant.

The other two kept their masks on the entire time, except when they were putting food into their mouths. As soon as they were done eating, they put the masks back on. The only other person we came within 6 feet of the entire time was our waitress, and even she wasn't wearing a mask.

I am all for personal choice - whether it comes to vaccination or mask wearing. But, geez, it's getting hard to have a serious conversation with someone who refuses to speak to you without a mask on.

If you're still so worried that you feel the need to wear a mask why even go to lunch?

The risk of a vaccinated person spreading the virus to someone else is probably around the same order magnitude as a person being harmed by the vaccine - meaning both are so small that they shouldn't even be blips on our daily radar. But both sides are still stuck where they are on these issues.


I have zero fear of the vaccine. But I do not see the need to expend any effort in getting it.

I have zero fear of the flu, and also do not take the time to get it either.

I was vaccinated for almost everything imaginable prior to my last deployment to Iraq. Vaccinations are fine.

I am also not concerned about actually being infected by COVId.

I just want everybody ok both sides to STFU and go back to normal. Or don't, but stop including me in your paranoia.




I agree with you in principle. I thought things should get back to normal last summer. This has gone on for way too long.

But, the problem is too many people believe that the "new normal" is vaccinations. Just like they believed the "new normal" when we didn't have a vaccine was wearing a mask.

No one with half a brain believes that masks prevent transmission. What masks do is allow employers and schools to say "If you were wearing a mask, you didn't get Covid at work/school." It also allows them to draw a hard line in the sand on who has to quarantine if people are exposed to Covid at work or school (Had on a mask around someone who came down with Covid? Don't have to quarantine.).

Without that line, no company would have brought back any non-essential workers and no school would have had in-person learning.

Now that we have a vaccine. The same logic applies. If employers want to be able to drop the mask requirement AND say "No, you didn't get Covid at work.", then everyone has to be vaccinated and report their vaccination to their employer (voluntarily, of course) .

Personally, at this point, if someone is still not vaccinated (at least here in TX) and they get Covid, that's 100% on them. But, personal responsibility has been absolutely obliterated over the last year. Whatever little was left is gone.

I've been pleasantly surprised to see how many school districts in my area are saying no masks after the end of this school year. But, arguably masks are too distracting in a school environment.

What's been proven in workplaces is that we can wear a mask and still do our jobs. Heck, plenty of people think wearing a mask is "no big deal" and anyone who complains about wearing one is a selfish jerk.

And because employers can't (and shouldn't) force employees to get vaccinated, they are going to rely on peer pressure and/or incentives to get people to comply.

I'm afraid we've let a genie out of a bottle and it's not going back in. And I don't think it's limited to just Covid. Have a really bad flu season one year? Guess what...masks are back.

Maybe I'm being too pessimistic, but none of the decisions made over the last 14 months give me confidence to believe otherwise.
The_Fox
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TXTransplant said:

The_Fox said:

TXTransplant said:

The refusal to get vaccinated is just the flip side of the same coin, the flip side being the people who won't let go of their security mask.

I went to lunch with three other people today. All of us are fully vaccinated (and we all know that about each other). We walked there - about 3/4 of a mile each way.

Two of us took our masks off as soon as we stepped outside and kept them off, even when we entered the restaurant.

The other two kept their masks on the entire time, except when they were putting food into their mouths. As soon as they were done eating, they put the masks back on. The only other person we came within 6 feet of the entire time was our waitress, and even she wasn't wearing a mask.

I am all for personal choice - whether it comes to vaccination or mask wearing. But, geez, it's getting hard to have a serious conversation with someone who refuses to speak to you without a mask on.

If you're still so worried that you feel the need to wear a mask why even go to lunch?

The risk of a vaccinated person spreading the virus to someone else is probably around the same order magnitude as a person being harmed by the vaccine - meaning both are so small that they shouldn't even be blips on our daily radar. But both sides are still stuck where they are on these issues.


I have zero fear of the vaccine. But I do not see the need to expend any effort in getting it.

I have zero fear of the flu, and also do not take the time to get it either.

I was vaccinated for almost everything imaginable prior to my last deployment to Iraq. Vaccinations are fine.

I am also not concerned about actually being infected by COVId.

I just want everybody ok both sides to STFU and go back to normal. Or don't, but stop including me in your paranoia.




I agree with you in principle. I thought things should get back to normal last summer. This has gone on for way too long.

But, the problem is too many people believe that the "new normal" is vaccinations. Just like they believed the "new normal" when we didn't have a vaccine was wearing a mask.

No one with half a brain believes that masks prevent transmission. What masks do is allow employers and schools to say "If you were wearing a mask, you didn't get Covid at work/school." It also allows them to draw a hard line in the sand on who has to quarantine if people are exposed to Covid at work or school (Had on a mask around someone who came down with Covid? Don't have to quarantine.).

Without that line, no company would have brought back any non-essential workers and no school would have had in-person learning.

Now that we have a vaccine. The same logic applies. If employers want to be able to drop the mask requirement AND say "No, you didn't get Covid at work.", then everyone has to be vaccinated and report their vaccination to their employer (voluntarily, of course) .

Personally, at this point, if someone is still not vaccinated (at least here in TX) and they get Covid, that's 100% on them. But, personal responsibility has been absolutely obliterated over the last year. Whatever little was left is gone.

I've been pleasantly surprised to see how many school districts in my area are saying no masks after the end of this school year. But, arguably masks are too distracting in a school environment.

What's been proven in workplaces is that we can wear a mask and still do our jobs. Heck, plenty of people think wearing a mask is "no big deal" and anyone who complains about wearing one is a selfish jerk.

And because employers can't (and shouldn't) force employees to get vaccinated, they are going to rely on peer pressure and/or incentives to get people to comply.

I'm afraid we've let a genie out of a bottle and it's not going back in. And I don't think it's limited to just Covid. Have a really bad flu season one year? Guess what...masks are back.

Maybe I'm being too pessimistic, but none of the decisions made over the last 14 months give me confidence to believe otherwise.


I own my own business, a law firm. We have never required masks, quarantining, or vaccinations. Perhaps those businesses doing so have weak leadership ,or are playing politics.
TXTransplant
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Yeah, I work in corporate America. Big difference. Quite a few of my colleagues at other companies are still WFH and aren't even allowed in the office.

I also know quite a few small businesses that are still requiring masks.

There is definitely a political component, but it's more than just that for employers - particularly employers that are in industries that are scrutinized for lost-time injuries and illnesses. For example, a lot of major companies in the O&G/petrochemicals industry hold themselves to higher ESH standards than OSHA even requires. Compensation is often tied to performance metrics, one of them being safety/RIR.
lunchbox
How long do you want to ignore this user?
94chem said:

lunchbox said:

Quote:

I think of my 50 year old friend (through international adoption connections), father of 6, who just passed.
Just curious...are the initials of this friend "D.W."?


Yeah.
Small world. He was my teacher at church and a very good friend. He's missed by many.
Dad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
SoupNazi2001 said:

jopatura said:

Let's say for fun none of the lockdown stuff happens. Masks are recommended from the get-go but never required politically. Businesses still have the choice whether to require them or not. Gatherings are never prohibited, but most people cancel them anyways out of precaution/liability/etc. Basically we are where we are today without any of the theater.

Do you still decide against the vaccine?


Absolutely because my case of Covid was like mild allergy symptoms for a few days. Why would I get vaccinated to prevent something my body already prevented?
I got the Covid vaccine early on when they were still only allowing medical providers to get it here in Texas.

I think the vaccine works. I think it works so well that I have gone completely back to normal life and won't wear a mask outside of work where it has always been required for the type of job I have.

Now that I've stated how pro-vaccine I am I want to say that I would not get it if I were in your situation... at least not right now. I know they keep saying that Covid survivors that get the vaccine have stronger reactions to the virus in a lab, but that doesn't mean that you are at high risk of getting re-infected and dying from it or ending up in the hospital... you are actually at incredibly low risk of that happening if you don't get the shot.

Even though it is rare, you can have adverse reactions to the shot and it might even be a higher risk in those that have already had Covid. I don't think the risk/reward really adds up for you getting a shot at this time. If new information comes out down the road where a bunch of previously infected people are getting really sick from Covid the second time around and the vaccinated people are not, I would then say getting the shot would be worth it at that point.
Aggie_Boomin 21
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ranger222 said:

It just blows my mind that the people that want all COVID restrictions limited are the same that won't get a vaccine. Do they realize THEY will be the ones that continue this for everyone?

It blows your mind that people are consistent with their principals?

This is largely where the source of the dichotomy lies, a prevailing deep rooted mind set of where responsibilities begin and end. My natural response to COVID, like many peoples' on this thread, is one rooted in personal responsibility and independence. This is increasingly applicable as vaccine availability increases. Through this statement of yours I have quoted, it's clear your natural response is that of intervention from a body capable of force being necessary. As restrictions continue I ask "wtf are the decision makers doing, open things up!?", while you ask "why are these people not following the decision makers lead, they have to in order for things to open back up!?" Of course you opinion is valid and worth no less than mine, and is likely the more common one. I just saw the two sentences of yours I have quoted and rolled my eyes.

I say this as a very young healthy person that had Covid last September, that does not intend to get the vaccine as I don't see how it poses any benefit. That being said I have encouraged family members of mine who aren't so young and healthy to get it.

My apologies if I missed interpreted what you said; though I think at worst I paraphrased in an unflattering light.
Capitol Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Aggie_Boomin 21 said:

Ranger222 said:

It just blows my mind that the people that want all COVID restrictions limited are the same that won't get a vaccine. Do they realize THEY will be the ones that continue this for everyone?

It blows your mind that people are consistent with their principals?

This is largely where the source of the dichotomy lies, a prevailing deep rooted mind set of where responsibilities begin and end. My natural response to COVID, like many peoples' on this thread, is one rooted in personal responsibility and independence. This is increasingly applicable as vaccine availability increases. Through this statement of yours I have quoted, it's clear your natural response is that of intervention from a body capable of force being necessary. As restrictions continue I ask "wtf are the decision makers doing, open things up!?", while you ask "why are these people not following the decision makers lead, they have to in order for things to open back up!?" Of course you opinion is valid and worth no less than mine, and is likely the more common one. I just saw the two sentences of yours I have quoted and rolled my eyes.

I say this as a very young healthy person that had Covid last September, that does not intend to get the vaccine as I don't see how it poses any benefit. That being said I have encouraged family members of mine who aren't so young and healthy to get it.

My apologies if I missed interpreted what you said; though I think at worst I paraphrased in an unflattering light.
I will say that you are both right. Ranger makes a point in that if more people get vaccinated, it will help us in getting rid of the restrictions as it gives "justification", if you will, to those who want to keep the limitations going to remove them. The problem with this argument? As of now, if you are vaccinated, you are still advised to wear masks when in public, keep distancing and even stay home unless absolutely necessary. Yet, there is such a minimal risk of spreading the virus once vaccinated, it makes no sense why those of us need to follow these guidelines at all anymore. Nut up powers that be (CDC, Fauci etc) and actually allow us to remove these and go wherever we want when we want. Let's take the chance and really see if there are any significant spikes due to vaccinated folks living pre-covid life. I am pretty willing to put major coin down that there will not be at all. That's how you get more motivated to vaccinate. Otherwise, there really is NO reason to vaccinate if we have to hide in house or behind a piece of cloth standing an arbitrary 6 feet from each other. Yet, we all know that many have no intention of limiting the restrictions any time soon. Even if almost everyone is vaccinated. Their agenda could be just innocent fear all the way to political power. So at some point, whether now, this summer or next year, those of us who are ready to go back may need to help others "rip off the band-aid". In the end, those folks will thank us for it.

But, Ranger, in my opinion, isn't saying nor advocating that Big Brother will allow us to open up more once vaccinated. He is just pointing out that many opposed to masking and closures are also not willing to do the one thing that is proven to limit a spread to a point where hospitals are fully safe. I think almost everyone on this forum, at this point in time, are fully ok with Covid remaining around, as it is most likely to, but with most being vaccinated and/or already had the virus, it will be very limited in scope and it's ability to spread. Meaning, I do not think most on this forum are wanting complete eradication of the virus as that isn't realistic. I do think if you had Covid, you probably do not need the vaccine but the booster can help you even more and it really is safe for adults.

I do draw the line with children as I do not intend to ever give my kids the vaccine as there really is not a need. But they are my kids. I'm ok with putting something in my body without issue but my level of proof and knowledge has to be a lot more for them. So do not ask me to choose between my kids' health concerns and those of adults who are at risk. I'll gladly and without remorse choose the potential health of my children over others every single time. We are expendable, my kids are not. For those without kids, this might seem strange, but that is what it's like to be a parent. I'd easily die for them and easily kill for them too. I truly hope to God that NEVER is a choice I have to make. And while the decision to vaccinate is no where near that level of life and death, I do want a lot more research and understanding before I'd decide to put it in my child at this point. The most realistic situation is that once they are adults and if a booster is needed, they take that by their own decision. They have had Covid, so they should be fine as of now anyway.

Enrico Pallazzo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Studies about reinfection rates indicate immunity is as strong or stronger than the vaccine
Premium
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Fitch said:

Just one anecdote - 13 of 14 people on my team are vaccinated at this point, which just happened in the last week or two. Beforehand we were doing team meetings via zoom at our desks or in conference rooms with some folks wearing masks because they have immune compromised parents who were watching their kids or pregnant wives to worry about. While that paradigm worked it was a distraction and not super efficient, but everyone did it out of common respect. Now, the team dynamic and office energy has completely shifted back to normal. I credit that 100% to basically have team herd immunity and that being a known thing.

All that simply to say, I disagree with any agency or business requiring a vaccine to work but understand the need to look at it from a perspective what yields the greatest benefit for the most people, in this case the whole company rather than each individual. Preference would always be towards free choice, but you get what you get sometimes.


Logic says, if the vaccine works and the elderly and the people who live with those people got the vaccine - why would they care what other coworkers decide? They are protected anyways!
Premium
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TXTransplant said:

While I certainly see the logic in this, 1) you don't know that your antibodies from infection are sufficient to prevent reinfection and 2) you don't know that you will have another mild case.

Now, arguably, you don't know these things for certain even if you are vaccinated, but there is a heck of a lot of data showing that they are true for the majority of vaccinated people.

I look at the vaccine as insurance, even if you've had Covid.


People who are vaccinated show at best 95% effectiveness. 1 out of 20 people are at risk.

1 in several million who have gotten the actual virus - you know, antibodies - have presented a second time.

The math isn't hard. Antibodies are better than the vaccine by an enormous margin.
ORAggieFan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Premium said:

TXTransplant said:

While I certainly see the logic in this, 1) you don't know that your antibodies from infection are sufficient to prevent reinfection and 2) you don't know that you will have another mild case.

Now, arguably, you don't know these things for certain even if you are vaccinated, but there is a heck of a lot of data showing that they are true for the majority of vaccinated people.

I look at the vaccine as insurance, even if you've had Covid.


People who are vaccinated show at best 95% effectiveness. 1 out of 20 people are at risk.

1 in several million who have gotten the actual virus - you know, antibodies - have presented a second time.

The math isn't hard. Antibodies are better than the vaccine by an enormous margin.

1 of 20 exposed to someone contagious. 1 in 1000 overall.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.