Fifth year in a row in the final four!
Post Reply
1 of 1
Wow! Didn't realize how good Pitt is.
3,028 Views |
15 Replies |
Last: 24 days ago by Ross Skillman 70
4 straight losses in the final four
About to be 5
The don't get the press State Penn or Neb or bovine get but that's just impressive
This will be the battle of the balanced offense vs single player offense.
Normally I would say balanced is better (see nebraska and us) but Babcock is just so good. We had problems containing the Kentucky OHs and can't seem to dig up a strong back row attack. Even if our serves are causing them to get out of system, they just set her back row.
This game will come down to our left side block to get some stuffs and our back court coverage. If babcock hits cross, Lednicky and Waak better be ready. If we can't do that, we will have to be able to match them point for point with our own offense, which we are quite capable of as well.
Normally I would say balanced is better (see nebraska and us) but Babcock is just so good. We had problems containing the Kentucky OHs and can't seem to dig up a strong back row attack. Even if our serves are causing them to get out of system, they just set her back row.
This game will come down to our left side block to get some stuffs and our back court coverage. If babcock hits cross, Lednicky and Waak better be ready. If we can't do that, we will have to be able to match them point for point with our own offense, which we are quite capable of as well.
1 seed number two about to go down,
Gig ‘Em Baby!
flintdragon said:
This will be the battle of the balanced offense vs single player offense.
Normally I would say balanced is better (see nebraska and us) but Babcock is just so good. We had problems containing the Kentucky OHs and can't seem to dig up a strong back row attack. Even if our serves are causing them to get out of system, they just set her back row.
This game will come down to our left side block to get some stuffs and our back court coverage. If babcock hits cross, Lednicky and Waak better be ready. If we can't do that, we will have to be able to match them point for point with our own offense, which we are quite capable of as well.
Pitt isnt a single player offense....yes they use her more than anybody else by far but they have other options
But Babcock is so terminal even from the back line it is amazing
Wonder if a non 1 seed has even gone through 3 1 seeds to win it all? That would be quite a feat.
Granted we fully deserved a 2 seed but still
Granted we fully deserved a 2 seed but still
how does the babcock girl compare to the Number 27 from Nebraska?
Babcock may be the best player in the country...but the rest of the team isn't nearly as good or as deep as Nebraska. But Babcock is a monster!
Babcock is infinitely better I believe, but like the poster said above, Harper Murray has so many better players around her. They will lean on Babcock so much more. We just have to make her uncomfortable as much as we can. A lot of it starts with serving tough, Pitt fans are always complaining about their passing so hopefully we attack them hard serving, then hopefully our block comes up strong.agswin1988 said:
how does the babcock girl compare to the Number 27 from Nebraska?
Pitt, over the past 4-5 years, is kind of like the Buffalo Bills of the 1990s. And I hope it continues that way.
Wicked Good Ag said:flintdragon said:
This will be the battle of the balanced offense vs single player offense.
Normally I would say balanced is better (see nebraska and us) but Babcock is just so good. We had problems containing the Kentucky OHs and can't seem to dig up a strong back row attack. Even if our serves are causing them to get out of system, they just set her back row.
This game will come down to our left side block to get some stuffs and our back court coverage. If babcock hits cross, Lednicky and Waak better be ready. If we can't do that, we will have to be able to match them point for point with our own offense, which we are quite capable of as well.
Pitt isnt a single player offense....yes they use her more than anybody else by far but they have other options
But Babcock is so terminal even from the back line it is amazing
I mean it's an exaggeration of course. They have some other really good players. But I feel like when Lednicky has recently and frequently commented about A&M being a balanced offense and not just about one player, she is specifically talking about Pitt. Maybe I'm just reading too much into it...but I don't think so.
flintdragon said:Wicked Good Ag said:flintdragon said:
This will be the battle of the balanced offense vs single player offense.
Normally I would say balanced is better (see nebraska and us) but Babcock is just so good. We had problems containing the Kentucky OHs and can't seem to dig up a strong back row attack. Even if our serves are causing them to get out of system, they just set her back row.
This game will come down to our left side block to get some stuffs and our back court coverage. If babcock hits cross, Lednicky and Waak better be ready. If we can't do that, we will have to be able to match them point for point with our own offense, which we are quite capable of as well.
Pitt isnt a single player offense....yes they use her more than anybody else by far but they have other options
But Babcock is so terminal even from the back line it is amazing
I mean it's an exaggeration of course. They have some other really good players. But I feel like when Lednicky has recently and frequently commented about A&M being a balanced offense and not just about one player, she is specifically talking about Pitt. Maybe I'm just reading too much into it...but I don't think so.
Jamie said the same thing yesterday. He said the Nebraska match was two balanced teams. He said Pitt will be our balance vs their Opposite.
Divining Rod said:
Fifth year in a row in the final four!
Nebraska beat all three teams at the final four.
Gig ‘Em Baby!
flintdragon said:Wicked Good Ag said:flintdragon said:
This will be the battle of the balanced offense vs single player offense.
Normally I would say balanced is better (see nebraska and us) but Babcock is just so good. We had problems containing the Kentucky OHs and can't seem to dig up a strong back row attack. Even if our serves are causing them to get out of system, they just set her back row.
This game will come down to our left side block to get some stuffs and our back court coverage. If babcock hits cross, Lednicky and Waak better be ready. If we can't do that, we will have to be able to match them point for point with our own offense, which we are quite capable of as well.
Pitt isnt a single player offense....yes they use her more than anybody else by far but they have other options
But Babcock is so terminal even from the back line it is amazing
I mean it's an exaggeration of course. They have some other really good players. But I feel like when Lednicky has recently and frequently commented about A&M being a balanced offense and not just about one player, she is specifically talking about Pitt. Maybe I'm just reading too much into it...but I don't think so.
apparently not much of an exaggeration
ross skillman 70
Featured Stories
See All
Texas A&M adds former Alabama WR Isaiah Horton via transfer portal
by Ryan Brauninger
Texas A&M adds Illinois DT Angelo McCullom via transfer portal
by Ryan Brauninger
17:40
1d ago
9.4k
Sunday (1/11) Portal Storylines: Closing the weekend with new additions
by TexAgs Recruiting