We wouldn't have both of them as L, both will be critical for us. One will be L, one DS. I could see Thedford wearing the L as a backup

Ag4eva95 said:

---

We wouldn't have both of them as L, both will be critical for us. One will be L, one DS. I could see Thedford wearing the L as a backup

---

Was responding to the assumption of a 6-2 with both OH playing 6 rotations. Not much room for a DS if you already have a L, S, and OH in the back row.

I guess you can sit the 2nd best little on the bench for most of the game and only come in situationally. But if they are both L, you could play the offensive and defensive L game if one is stronger at serve receive or whatever.

Obviously a 5-1 or Ring not playing 6 rotations gives you room for a DS and having your best two littles on the court at the same time is a plus.

I enjoyed watching the run, but didn't get to see the whole season so I don't know the answer to my question below.

I hope it's the case she can, does Megan's passing when she was on the floor last year indicate she can be a 6 rotation player?

That's valid! It's a good problem to have. I'm curious to see if Ring can hang with 6 rotations. I can see it being similar to Hellmuth. But Applegate and Rodriguez, in my opinion, can be one of the best "little" rooms in the nation. Morrison will get creative with how they get involved. The exciting thing is, we have many options. Across the board. This is another deeep team, just a little unproven at some interesting positions

How much does addition of Nicholson change your line ups?

D.J. Flores said:

---

How much does addition of Nicholson change your line ups?

---

I'm not sure, but it does give us a real option at running a 6-2 if Morrison wants to go that route. Will be interesting to see what they do.

My gut tells me we will develop into a 5-1 with Musgrove, but I think there will be growing pains with team development. Wouldn't be surprised to see multiple looks throughout the year. This is still a deep team, just not sure where the pieces will fit

Ag4eva95 said:

---

My gut tells me we will develop into a 5-1 with Musgrove, but I think there will be growing pains with team development. Wouldn't be surprised to see multiple looks throughout the year. This is still a deep team, just not sure where the pieces will fit

---

I trust they'll all fit together in December

Any updated predictions for the starting lineup after the spring matches?

I'm curious about the opposite position! Morris or Lacewell… it'll be interesting, no easy opponents to open up the season! Throw them into the fire and see who's ready to step up!

I wish we knew more on who played the most in that last SMU match

Morris' height at the net is definitely an advantage, but Lacewell's arm swing is so good that it would be a shame to see her on the bench in my opinion. The position is think is still wide open though, and whoever starts could change by the end of the season. Maybe even have Fitch hitting out of the backrow? She's probably my pick for the next best pin hitter after Stowers and Ring.