Are the results posted somewhere?

http://www.flashresults.com/2008_Meets/outdoor/Big12/HTMLResults.htm

quote:

---

The national rankings that have us ranked number one is not a projection on how we will do at the national meet.

---

I beg to differ:

This taken from the 2008 NCAA Division I Track & Field Team Rankings Rationale and Guidelines

quote:

---

The purpose of the rankings is to recognize those teams who have, on a national scale, the best overall chances of making an impact at the NCAA Championships based on its squad members’ best marks of the season.

---

Thanks

AWESOME EFFORT TRACK TEAMS!!! THANX A BUNCH~~~~~~~~~~LONG HARD HOURS PAID OFF

quote:

---

Funny you don't hear them using the heat as an excuse for poor performance when the conference meet is in Texas.

---

you sure about that!?!?

2207- you are wrong about the track rankings, as noted above.

And I extend to you the same invitation- please do tell where the disappointments were in our performance.

Tell us how we were "supposed" to perform. I don't think our men disappointed. We scored about like we should have expected.

I have yet to hear this question answered. Seems to me like you people just want to *****. If I recall, we were not too far off of our projected finish in points meaning we did not lose because we were bad. We lost becasue Colorado scored 32 points in 1 event. If the meet is anywhere else, we most likely win by 20 points. Good job men!