quote:
Yes the USA was not a complete team, however it was not the "B" BS everybody is calling it.
What exactly is BS about it? Are you saying it was closer to our A team or that it's a poor excuse for the loss? If you are saying the latter, I agree. If you are saying the former, you're dead wrong.
quote:
You had some of your top 22 USA players on the field yesterday, which means that the top 11 are good, but after that it is a pretty bad team.
Some...not all...not even close to all. In fact of the 15 players that played yesterday, I can name 7 that will almost assuredly not make the World Cup roster, or if they do, won't get any playing time unless a flood of injuries occur.
*Berhalter
*Conrad
*Zavagnin
*Ching
Klein
Olsen
Pearce
* means they started the game.
In addition, I'd say only 3 of the players (Keller, Mastroeni, and Cherundolo) are certain first choice selections.
It would be like putting Paul Robinson, Frank Lampard and Ashley Cole with a bunch of Zat Knights and expecting them to win against a motivated German team. They wouldn't have (although it would have been MUCH closer).
In other words, that roster and that game didn't prove that our first 11 are good or that our second 11 are bad. It proved that our second 15 (for the most part) can't compete against a nearly full strength Germany squad that had to have a result...and not just a result but a resounding result. That's all it proved and to be fair, I didn't need a friendly to prove that to me...I already knew that.