Was in before the bandwagoners for both podcasts and JRE
Macarthur said:c-jags said:
Joe can be listened to at 1.5 speed most of the time.
Unlike Ben Shapiro.
But I do agree the long form interview is so much better than the sound bites we get from most media. Usually they're looking for the sound bites and we get dumb questions.
While I may not agree with Bernie on anything, I like that Joe lets him explain his entire position in a nuanced manner.
but they really aren't as radical as the Facebook or Twitter meme world would have you believe.
TCTTS said:
I'm a huge UFO buff, and want Lazar's story to be real, but after a ton of research, I finally had to come to terms with the fact that it just doesn't add up. I used to believe him, but when you really start to look into his claims/life, there are just too many inconsistencies. Ironically, I can actually believe the UFO-reverse-engineering of it all. It's everything about his story before that point that doesn't check out or hold up to even the slightest scrutiny.
Also, Jeremy Corbell, who appeared with Lazar during his Rogen interview, and appears with Fravor during his, is a bit of huckster. Rather, I think he believes everything he's peddling, and ultimately has noble efforts, but he's a little too caught up in the sensationalism and trying to be the face of this whole thing. Something about him just rubs me the wrong way, and you can tell in the interview above that Rogen is kind of annoyed by him as well. We need the Corbells of this world to step back and more people like Fravor and Luis Elizondo (and his team) coming forward...
c-jags said:Macarthur said:c-jags said:
Joe can be listened to at 1.5 speed most of the time.
Unlike Ben Shapiro.
But I do agree the long form interview is so much better than the sound bites we get from most media. Usually they're looking for the sound bites and we get dumb questions.
While I may not agree with Bernie on anything, I like that Joe lets him explain his entire position in a nuanced manner.
but they really aren't as radical as the Facebook or Twitter meme world would have you believe.
What's funny is that while I agree that letting people express their opinions is great, Bernie's opening line of "I think healthcare is a right and everybody should have it. Is that extreme Joe? Is that extreme?"
I screamed "yes it's extreme. Having a right to somebody else's time and money is extreme!" I don't want to get into a poli board argument, by any stretch because I completely think there's some rational thought behind Bernie's proposals, I just have opinions that lean the other way.
Point being that Joe just let it go (I'm pretty sure he agreed,) as he should for his form of interviewing.
I do think he challenges people on the right more but he's great at the concept of letting people get their thoughts out there for the most part and respect it.
See his interview with Dan Crenshaw, challenged him, but let him explain how he arrived at his positions.
PatAg said:
Not sure google searching for blogs is definitive proof, lol
Do you even know what topic we're discussing or are you just obligated to make some prissy little sniping comment on every Entertainment Board thread?PatAg said:
Not sure google searching for blogs is definitive proof, lol
YouBet said:c-jags said:Macarthur said:c-jags said:
Joe can be listened to at 1.5 speed most of the time.
Unlike Ben Shapiro.
But I do agree the long form interview is so much better than the sound bites we get from most media. Usually they're looking for the sound bites and we get dumb questions.
While I may not agree with Bernie on anything, I like that Joe lets him explain his entire position in a nuanced manner.
but they really aren't as radical as the Facebook or Twitter meme world would have you believe.
What's funny is that while I agree that letting people express their opinions is great, Bernie's opening line of "I think healthcare is a right and everybody should have it. Is that extreme Joe? Is that extreme?"
I screamed "yes it's extreme. Having a right to somebody else's time and money is extreme!" I don't want to get into a poli board argument, by any stretch because I completely think there's some rational thought behind Bernie's proposals, I just have opinions that lean the other way.
Point being that Joe just let it go (I'm pretty sure he agreed,) as he should for his form of interviewing.
I do think he challenges people on the right more but he's great at the concept of letting people get their thoughts out there for the most part and respect it.
See his interview with Dan Crenshaw, challenged him, but let him explain how he arrived at his positions.
Healthcare is like the climate change debate. There is no middle ground.
I can absolutely understand the argument that healthcare should be a "right". The idea that someone gets bankrupted because of something that might be out of their control just sucks.
But, there are ways to address this without doing mandatory socialized healthcare for all and destroying the country over it. It's just a maddening topic.
Give me examples where I'm not paying stifling taxes and it works well in a populous, extremely diverse culture.Macarthur said:YouBet said:c-jags said:Macarthur said:c-jags said:
Joe can be listened to at 1.5 speed most of the time.
Unlike Ben Shapiro.
But I do agree the long form interview is so much better than the sound bites we get from most media. Usually they're looking for the sound bites and we get dumb questions.
While I may not agree with Bernie on anything, I like that Joe lets him explain his entire position in a nuanced manner.
but they really aren't as radical as the Facebook or Twitter meme world would have you believe.
What's funny is that while I agree that letting people express their opinions is great, Bernie's opening line of "I think healthcare is a right and everybody should have it. Is that extreme Joe? Is that extreme?"
I screamed "yes it's extreme. Having a right to somebody else's time and money is extreme!" I don't want to get into a poli board argument, by any stretch because I completely think there's some rational thought behind Bernie's proposals, I just have opinions that lean the other way.
Point being that Joe just let it go (I'm pretty sure he agreed,) as he should for his form of interviewing.
I do think he challenges people on the right more but he's great at the concept of letting people get their thoughts out there for the most part and respect it.
See his interview with Dan Crenshaw, challenged him, but let him explain how he arrived at his positions.
Healthcare is like the climate change debate. There is no middle ground.
I can absolutely understand the argument that healthcare should be a "right". The idea that someone gets bankrupted because of something that might be out of their control just sucks.
But, there are ways to address this without doing mandatory socialized healthcare for all and destroying the country over it. It's just a maddening topic.
Hate to derail, but here is the hyperbole that plagues this debate. There are single Payor systems that are not mandatory socialized healthcare. And it most certainly will NOT destroy the country.
Macarthur said:YouBet said:c-jags said:Macarthur said:c-jags said:
Joe can be listened to at 1.5 speed most of the time.
Unlike Ben Shapiro.
But I do agree the long form interview is so much better than the sound bites we get from most media. Usually they're looking for the sound bites and we get dumb questions.
While I may not agree with Bernie on anything, I like that Joe lets him explain his entire position in a nuanced manner.
but they really aren't as radical as the Facebook or Twitter meme world would have you believe.
What's funny is that while I agree that letting people express their opinions is great, Bernie's opening line of "I think healthcare is a right and everybody should have it. Is that extreme Joe? Is that extreme?"
I screamed "yes it's extreme. Having a right to somebody else's time and money is extreme!" I don't want to get into a poli board argument, by any stretch because I completely think there's some rational thought behind Bernie's proposals, I just have opinions that lean the other way.
Point being that Joe just let it go (I'm pretty sure he agreed,) as he should for his form of interviewing.
I do think he challenges people on the right more but he's great at the concept of letting people get their thoughts out there for the most part and respect it.
See his interview with Dan Crenshaw, challenged him, but let him explain how he arrived at his positions.
Healthcare is like the climate change debate. There is no middle ground.
I can absolutely understand the argument that healthcare should be a "right". The idea that someone gets bankrupted because of something that might be out of their control just sucks.
But, there are ways to address this without doing mandatory socialized healthcare for all and destroying the country over it. It's just a maddening topic.
Hate to derail, but here is the hyperbole that plagues this debate. There are single Payor systems that are not mandatory socialized healthcare. And it most certainly will NOT destroy the country.
aggieforester05 said:Macarthur said:YouBet said:c-jags said:Macarthur said:c-jags said:
Joe can be listened to at 1.5 speed most of the time.
Unlike Ben Shapiro.
But I do agree the long form interview is so much better than the sound bites we get from most media. Usually they're looking for the sound bites and we get dumb questions.
While I may not agree with Bernie on anything, I like that Joe lets him explain his entire position in a nuanced manner.
but they really aren't as radical as the Facebook or Twitter meme world would have you believe.
What's funny is that while I agree that letting people express their opinions is great, Bernie's opening line of "I think healthcare is a right and everybody should have it. Is that extreme Joe? Is that extreme?"
I screamed "yes it's extreme. Having a right to somebody else's time and money is extreme!" I don't want to get into a poli board argument, by any stretch because I completely think there's some rational thought behind Bernie's proposals, I just have opinions that lean the other way.
Point being that Joe just let it go (I'm pretty sure he agreed,) as he should for his form of interviewing.
I do think he challenges people on the right more but he's great at the concept of letting people get their thoughts out there for the most part and respect it.
See his interview with Dan Crenshaw, challenged him, but let him explain how he arrived at his positions.
Healthcare is like the climate change debate. There is no middle ground.
I can absolutely understand the argument that healthcare should be a "right". The idea that someone gets bankrupted because of something that might be out of their control just sucks.
But, there are ways to address this without doing mandatory socialized healthcare for all and destroying the country over it. It's just a maddening topic.
Hate to derail, but here is the hyperbole that plagues this debate. There are single Payor systems that are not mandatory socialized healthcare. And it most certainly will NOT destroy the country.
Sorry, but you're wrong. We'll end up paying more for worse health care and innovation will grind to an abrupt halt. Don't be foolish, we have the best quality healthcare in the world and every other country is dependent on us for innovation. The tax increases will certainly be extremely harmful to the economy.
Yelnick McWawa said:
Take it to the politics board, fellas.