Felt weird knowing the response to the DD that James missed. I was like damn the one I do know you miss and potentially change the game, man.
Yep, thought for sure he would nail garnet with sports background. Thought he was a pretty big sports trivia guy as a kid based on his video.P.C. Principal said:
Felt weird knowing the response to the DD that James missed. I was like damn the one I do know you miss and potentially change the game, man.
Tony Franklins Other Shoe said:Yep, thought for sure he would nail garnet with sports background. Thought he was a pretty big sports trivia guy as a kid based on his video.P.C. Principal said:
Felt weird knowing the response to the DD that James missed. I was like damn the one I do know you miss and potentially change the game, man.
EMY92 said:
I'll be interested in the gamesmanship now that Ken is one win away.
Will James/Brad if they're in 3rd place in a game go silent to help the other win to prevent Ken from winning? In this setup, losing can give you a chance to win it all as long as Ken doesn't win.
I told my wife - what really gets me is when I've never even remotely heard of anything in the question or the answer.HTownAg98 said:
Does anyone else feel stupid when you hear the questions?
double aught said:Not to bring you down, but James and Brad could've missed intentionally. Game was over.Sports-Ag said:
I actually got Final Jeopardy right and the contestants didn't. I feel smart.
HTownAg98 said:
Does anyone else feel stupid when you hear the questions?
I can honestly say I got the Steve Largent question right that they didn't get. But I've been a Seattle fan since inception.MuckRaker96 said:I told my wife - what really gets me is when I've never even remotely heard of anything in the question or the answer.HTownAg98 said:
Does anyone else feel stupid when you hear the questions?
On the flip side, after writing about 300 blogs on cybersecurity for a client in the past year, I got the entire category right last night. Probably the only time I've ever done so when the category wasn't sports or star wars.
Tony Franklins Other Shoe said:I can honestly say I got the Steve Largent question right that they didn't get. But I've been a Seattle fan since inception.MuckRaker96 said:I told my wife - what really gets me is when I've never even remotely heard of anything in the question or the answer.HTownAg98 said:
Does anyone else feel stupid when you hear the questions?
On the flip side, after writing about 300 blogs on cybersecurity for a client in the past year, I got the entire category right last night. Probably the only time I've ever done so when the category wasn't sports or star wars.
Redstone said:
Largent was a Rep (1 of 435), not a Sen (1 of 100, or 2 per state).
Rep represents approx 600,000; Sen the entire state, regardless of population.
Redstone said:
It is important to be precise (and, obviously, correct) on a thread about trivia and high-level trivia players.
Well in that case, the word you are looking for is "accurate", not "precise".Redstone said:
It is important to be precise (and, obviously, correct) on a thread about trivia and high-level trivia players.
Exactly the same here. After getting all the cyber security questions (they were really pretty easy), I felt like a MFin rocket scientist. Then I realized that just means I'm really narrow in my interests.MuckRaker96 said:I told my wife - what really gets me is when I've never even remotely heard of anything in the question or the answer.HTownAg98 said:
Does anyone else feel stupid when you hear the questions?
On the flip side, after writing about 300 blogs on cybersecurity for a client in the past year, I got the entire category right last night. Probably the only time I've ever done so when the category wasn't sports or star wars.