Did not know it was being redone again
good call. or harley quinn.FightinTexasAg15 said:
Cruella - Joker but Disney
well it actually means "of the city" in french.bearamedic99 said:
I was today years old when I realized her last name De Ville meant Devil
Maleficent I think you can kind of make a story about and create a semi-sympathetic character. I'd say it's tough to make a sympathetic figure out of a character whose sole aim is to SKIN PUPPIES IN ORDER TO MAKE FUR COATS.Quad Dog said:
Same crowd Maleficent and it's sequel was for.
i bet they are really soft, though.Claude! said:Maleficent I think you can kind of make a story about and create a semi-sympathetic character. I'd say it's tough to make a sympathetic figure out of a character whose sole aim is to SKIN PUPPIES IN ORDER TO MAKE FUR COATS.Quad Dog said:
Same crowd Maleficent and it's sequel was for.
At least she focused on a breed with inferior genetics with the deafness trait?Claude! said:Maleficent I think you can kind of make a story about and create a semi-sympathetic character. I'd say it's tough to make a sympathetic figure out of a character whose sole aim is to SKIN PUPPIES IN ORDER TO MAKE FUR COATS.Quad Dog said:
Same crowd Maleficent and it's sequel was for.
I could be about that, but make it a rated R movie. Most of the live action remakes have been terrible. It took an entire bottle of wine for me to get through the live action Lion King.Average Joe said:
I think I'm ok with this type of Disney live action. Haven't been a fan of the live action films that just tell the exact story that the cartoons did. Today's kids are more Pixar, anyway. Give us adults some dark Disney villain origin stories.
Harley Quinn but DisneyFightinTexasAg15 said:
Cruella - Joker but Disney
She wanted to skin them for a coatTCTTS said:
Wait, what? That sounds super dark. I thought I remember her owning (???) a bunch of Dalmatians in the animated movie, but she actually skinned them to make a coat??? That was her thing? And Disney decided to make an origin story about this person?
No dog dies in the 101 DalmationsTCTTS said:
But is that really something she did? Skinned dogs for coats? For some reason I thought just she owned a bunch of Dalmatians and that was it. Like she just had a thing for owning lots of dogs with spots.
TCTTS said:
But is that really something she did? Skinned dogs for coats? For some reason I thought just she owned a bunch of Dalmatians and that was it. Like she just had a thing for owning lots of dogs with spots.
this is hilarious.TCTTS said:
Wait, what? That sounds super dark. I thought I remember her owning (???) a bunch of Dalmatians in the animated movie, but she actually skinned them to make a coat??? That was her thing? And Disney decided to make an origin story about this person?
Yes. She bought/stole a bunch of Dalmatians in order to have her furrier (that's the profession, not a statement on his relative hairiness) husband make a coat out of them. Wackiness ensues.TCTTS said:
Right. I just don't remember her *wanting* to kill them. My surprise comes more from Disney, of all companies, rebooting a character whose goal is to kill and skin dogs. That just seems insane to me. I can't stand PETA, but it seems like they would have this movie/character in their sights from day one. For that reason alone, it seems not worth the headache.