I'm torn.
On one hand, that was an incredibly fun movie-going experience. Until Christmas day, when this finally goes wide, it's playing in only one theater in LA, Paul Thomas Anderson's favorite, the Regency Village Theater in Westwood (by UCLA), where they do a ton premieres, that seats over 1300 people. And I would say it was about 90% full tonight. So a massive crowd who laughed throughout, and there are few things better than seeing a movie like this in a theater like that with a buzzing audience.
That said... this is one of the most *random* movies I have ever seen. And this is coming from a huge PTA fan.
The plot of this movie, as the trailer suggests (though I still wasn't 100% sure going in), really is the romantic, will-they/won't-they story of 25-year-old woman with a job and a 15-going-on-16-year-old actor/entrepreneur boy in high school. Who eventually start a waterbed company together.
Yes, that's the plot of Licorice Pizza, the title of which is never referenced once, in any way.
Don't get me wrong... it's funny (hilarious even, at times), it's endearing, it's incredibly well made, and the soundtrack is fantastic. But it also kind of sort of feels like PTA was out of ideas, so he threw two or three half-baked ideas together, set it in the San Fernando Valley again (where he grew up and where Boogie Nights takes place), and slapped a super random title on it.
Yet… I also still really liked it? I think?
We heard some people talking on the way out that it felt like a few mini movies strung together, and that's certainly somewhat accurate. The love story is definitely the spine throughout, but there are these entire crazy sequences - one with Sean Penn's character, one with Bradley Cooper's character, and one with Benny Sadie's character - that each feel like they're from totally different movies. Though, not necessarily in a bad way at all. In fact, the Bradley Cooper stuff is flat-out amazing, had the audience rolling, and the movie goes to a whole other level when his character shows up. It's electric, and so damn funny. But his segment is way too brief, and you ultimately end up wanting him to be the foil throughout, instead of just for 20 minutes or so.
I don't know. I need to sit with this one a while and maybe even see it again. It's already growing on me more and more, but it's definitely a few notches below the best of PTA (which, in fairness, consists of some of the best movies ever made).
I'm so incredibly curious to hear what the rest of you are going to think...