Entertainment
Sponsored by

Aziz Ansari: Nightclub Comedian

7,755 Views | 93 Replies | Last: 4 yr ago by HerschelwoodHardhead
Boo Weekley
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bunk Moreland said:

Quote:

Nah, just sick of braindead Hollywood liberal hypocrites who think everyone who doesn't think like them is an idiot.

You do understand the irony of this right?
Not really...if we're being honest, this is how most people think deep down. TCTTS would think many of my political takes are idiotic, and likewise. But we are not entertainers trying to appeal to the masses and bring people together for entertainment. I have always known hollywood was rabidly leftist. And I still gave them my money because I didn't care that they had their own political opinions. It's when they start preaching down and injecting their politics into entertainment that I get turned off to it.

If Jimbo Fisher got up to the podium in post-game pressers and routinely bashed the left for being mask obsessed CDC and Fauci loving drones who can't think for themselves, I am pretty sure left wingers would feel alienated and grow to despise him over time. Just an off the wall example to hopefully provide some illustration for you. Hope that helps. If I need to simplify, please advise.

Trust me, leftists would be able to grasp this if the shoe was on the other foot.

With the "anti-vaxx" stuff....a lot of people (millions) who have been loyal employees of their companies for years and are just trying to put food on the table and provide for their families just had their livelihoods threatened if they didn't cave to the medical demands of a braindead dementia riddled idiot in chief (who just a year ago was literally scaring people away from the "Trump vaxx"). It's naturally a pretty sensitive subject for many, and mocking them as "idiot anti-vaxxers" naturally pisses them off. Aziz and Hollywood are free to do this, and people are free to boycott or b*tch about it. And you're of course free to white knight for them and be offended if people don't worship the ground they walk on.
Whos Juan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Boo Weekley said:



Personally, I now hate most of Hollywood and hope they continue to stick to this formula of alienating people who dare to see the world differently than them.
Boo Weekley
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Whos Juan said:

Boo Weekley said:



Personally, I now hate most of Hollywood and hope they continue to stick to this formula of alienating people who dare to see the world differently than them.

Partly to enlighten TCTTS and other industry insiders of the growing problem that threatens to negatively impact his industry. By exposing him to the sentiment from slackjawed middle America, hopefully he can spread the word that alienating these simpletons/cretins (who aren't enlightened like Leonardo Dicaprio, Kathy Griffin and Cher etc.) is insulting and bad for business and maybe get Hollywood back on the path to being a somewhat respected group/industry.
Whos Juan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Boo Weekley said:

Whos Juan said:

Boo Weekley said:



Personally, I now hate most of Hollywood and hope they continue to stick to this formula of alienating people who dare to see the world differently than them.

Partly to enlighten TCTTS and other industry insiders of the growing problem that threatens to negatively impact his industry. By exposing him to the sentiment from slackjawed middle America, hopefully he can spread the word that alienating these simpletons/cretins (who aren't enlightened like Leonardo Dicaprio, Kathy Griffin and Cher etc.) is insulting and bad for business and maybe get Hollywood back on the path to being a somewhat respected group/industry.
Orrrr you could just simply ignore it and separate their work from their personal views.

The film industry is doing just fine, btw.
Boo Weekley
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Whos Juan said:

Boo Weekley said:

Whos Juan said:

Boo Weekley said:



Personally, I now hate most of Hollywood and hope they continue to stick to this formula of alienating people who dare to see the world differently than them.

Partly to enlighten TCTTS and other industry insiders of the growing problem that threatens to negatively impact his industry. By exposing him to the sentiment from slackjawed middle America, hopefully he can spread the word that alienating these simpletons/cretins (who aren't enlightened like Leonardo Dicaprio, Kathy Griffin and Cher etc.) is insulting and bad for business and maybe get Hollywood back on the path to being a somewhat respected group/industry.
Orrrr you could just simply ignore it and separate their work from their personal views.

The film industry is doing just fine, btw.
As I have said, I did this for decades. You have to, or else there's nothing to watch. I am fine with entertainers having their own political opinions that differ from mine. It's the ever increasing trend of them trying to preach down to/lecture/virtue signal to the common folks that is rubbing millions of people the wrong way.

They may be doing fine, i think they could do better. I know a lot of friends who have had enough. Maybe the chickens haven't come home to roost. We are at a weird tipping point in our society where EVERYTHING is so politicized. If Sports and entertainment could just be that (Sports and Entertainment), it would be a serious breath of fresh air for tens of millions just trying to get away from the real world drama and be entertained for a bit. Again, I wouldn't expect most of yall to get it, because your toes aren't the ones being stepped on, so all is well, no harm no foul.
boy09
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Imagine getting this worked up about something you haven't even watched...
Duncan Idaho
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You are living in a fantasy world if you think sports and entertainment have ever been separated from social and political commentary in any meaningful sense.

Art by it's very definition is a commentary of how it's creators see society, politics and religion. Feature length films started out as political commentary.
Quote:


Most feature films are between 75 and 210 minutes long. The first narrative feature film was the 60-minute The Story of the Kelly Gang (1906, Australia).[1] The first (proto)-feature-length film adaptation was Les Misrables (1909, U.S.). Other early feature films include L'Inferno, Defence of Sevastopol (1911), Oliver Twist (American version), Oliver Twist (British version), Richard III, From the Manger to the Cross, Cleopatra (1912), Quo Vadis? (1913), Cabiria (1914) and The Birth of a Nation (1915).

Most if not all of these have some political or social commentary.

Sports has also been intertwined with the civil rights movement since at least the 1936 Olympics. I am sure it goes back further than that. Sports is a meritocracy and as such it provides a platform for members of the under privileged classes a platform to speak

There is not such thing as Entertainment without social/political/economic/relit commentary.
Boo Weekley
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Duncan Idaho said:

You are living in a fantasy world if you think sports and entertainment have ever been separated from social and political commentary in any meaningful sense.

Art by it's very definition is a commentary of how it's creators see society, politics and religion. Feature length films started out as political commentary.
Quote:


Most feature films are between 75 and 210 minutes long. The first narrative feature film was the 60-minute The Story of the Kelly Gang (1906, Australia).[1] The first (proto)-feature-length film adaptation was Les Misrables (1909, U.S.). Other early feature films include L'Inferno, Defence of Sevastopol (1911), Oliver Twist (American version), Oliver Twist (British version), Richard III, From the Manger to the Cross, Cleopatra (1912), Quo Vadis? (1913), Cabiria (1914) and The Birth of a Nation (1915).

Most if not all of these have some political or social commentary.

Sports has also been intertwined with the civil rights movement since at least the 1936 Olympics. I am sure it goes back further than that. Sports is a meritocracy and as such it provides a platform for members of the under privileged classes a platform to speak

There is not such thing as Entertainment without social/political/economic/relit commentary.
You are delusional beyond all hope if you don't notice how out of control (in one way) it has gotten in recent years. Again, you are "onw of them" so I do not expect you to get it. You would if the right wing ever high jacked sports and entertainment.

It's almost insulting how stupid you and TCTTS and some others think we are. Just the other day, TCTTS tried to make the argument (with a straight face) that Hollywood wasn't overwhelmingly lib. I think he was counting all of the behind the scenes people, but still. It's absurd. Any actor could come out in support of Socialism or Marxism with zero backlash, but right wing actors face being blackballed if they speak their minds.

I don't expect you to get it. I think people left of center are incapable of acknowledging this (with few exceptions) because you get the warm fuzzies when Susan Sarandon or Meryl Streep or Miley Cyrus get up in front of an auditorium and start espousing your left winged views.
Duncan Idaho
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The problem with this is that I have no interest in the beliefs of Susan Sarandon or Meryl Streep or Miley Cyrus, nor do I give them any more thought than I do Mel Gibson, Tim Allen or John Travolta.

But Susan Sarandon and Meryl Streep are talented actresses that tend to pick good/interesting projects to work on.

I loved tool time, I tried watching Tim Allen's last show but it was unwatchable. For the most part entertainment aimed at conservative audiences is nothing but inane ramblings that feed the audience's "Christian/conservative persecution complex" and is for the most part unwatchable.

Mel Gibson makes some fine films and is a great actor. Kevin sorbo is neither.
Boo Weekley
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Duncan Idaho said:

The problem with this is that I have no interest in the beliefs of Susan Sarandon or Meryl Streep or Miley Cyrus, nor do I give them any more thought than I do Mel Gibson, Tim Allen or John Travolta.

But Susan Sarandon and Meryl Streep are talented actresses that tend to pick good/interesting projects to work on.

I loved tool time, I tried watching Tim Allen's last show but it was unwatchable. For the most part entertainment aimed at conservative audiences is nothing but inane ramblings that feed the audience's "Christian/conservative persecution complex" and is for the most part unwatchable.

Mel Gibson makes some fine films and is a great actor. Kevin sorbo is neither.
You miss the point, I think it's too complex. I am busy right now but I'll come back and simplify it for you until you get it. Don't give up on yourself or feel down just yet! From my experience, almost zero male feminist leftists are able to grasp this type of subject matter...but I think I have an idea that might better illustrate what I'm talking about.

boy09
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Boo Weekley said:

You miss the point, I think it's too complex.

Lol. Nah, it's really not..
Duncan Idaho
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Quote:


male feminist leftists


Now I am convinced you are a troll that this trying to make typical conservatives audience's look like a room full 16chan posters.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Boo Weekley said:

Duncan Idaho said:

You are living in a fantasy world if you think sports and entertainment have ever been separated from social and political commentary in any meaningful sense.

Art by it's very definition is a commentary of how it's creators see society, politics and religion. Feature length films started out as political commentary.
Quote:


Most feature films are between 75 and 210 minutes long. The first narrative feature film was the 60-minute The Story of the Kelly Gang (1906, Australia).[1] The first (proto)-feature-length film adaptation was Les Misrables (1909, U.S.). Other early feature films include L'Inferno, Defence of Sevastopol (1911), Oliver Twist (American version), Oliver Twist (British version), Richard III, From the Manger to the Cross, Cleopatra (1912), Quo Vadis? (1913), Cabiria (1914) and The Birth of a Nation (1915).

Most if not all of these have some political or social commentary.

Sports has also been intertwined with the civil rights movement since at least the 1936 Olympics. I am sure it goes back further than that. Sports is a meritocracy and as such it provides a platform for members of the under privileged classes a platform to speak

There is not such thing as Entertainment without social/political/economic/relit commentary.
You are delusional beyond all hope if you don't notice how out of control (in one way) it has gotten in recent years. Again, you are "onw of them" so I do not expect you to get it. You would if the right wing ever high jacked sports and entertainment.

It's almost insulting how stupid you and TCTTS and some others think we are. Just the other day, TCTTS tried to make the argument (with a straight face) that Hollywood wasn't overwhelmingly lib. I think he was counting all of the behind the scenes people, but still. It's absurd. Any actor could come out in support of Socialism or Marxism with zero backlash, but right wing actors face being blackballed if they speak their minds.

I don't expect you to get it. I think people left of center are incapable of acknowledging this (with few exceptions) because you get the warm fuzzies when Susan Sarandon or Meryl Streep or Miley Cyrus get up in front of an auditorium and start espousing your left winged views.

People here always ask me why I don't just ignore you guys and one big reason is that you're constantly misquoting me. Case in point, what I've actually said - many, many times - is that Hollywood isn't a liberal hive-mind; that of hundreds of thousands if not millions of people in this industry, there are plenty of conservatives, non-extreme liberals, and middle-of-the-road folk. I have never ever once said that Hollywood isn't overwhelmingly liberal. My *only* contention is that it's not as wholly liberal as you guys make it out to be. Are the worst offenders as bad as you say? Of course. For the 400th time, I agree 100% and wish, just like you, that some of them would keep their mouths shut. I'm merely saying, I'm the one who actually lives and works here and I'm constantly coming across people - from execs to below-the-line workers - who don't at all share the opinions of Clooney, Penn, Streep, and the like. I've been saying this for years and yet, for years, you guys only hear what you want to hear, and then constantly tell others the version of the truth you think you read, smearing me in the process.

To that end, why should I ever listen to a word you have to say when you so often don't listen to mine? For instance, yesterday I *just* told you how sick and tired I and others are of you guys coming here to bash Hollywood day after day after day; that it's not that you're saying negative things about Hollywood, rather it's the frequency in which it interrupts our conversations, and that you can't keep the bashing to F16, 99% of which is political in nature. Yet, today, when someone asks you via meme, "Why are you here again?" you brazenly say, "to enlighten TCTTS and other industry insiders of the growing problem that threatens to negatively impact his industry." Tell me, how, on God's green earth, do you not think that message has come through loud and clear for YEARS now? Especially when, again, I *just* told you that it did. How do you seriously think I'm not already enlightened to that fact?

Here's the thing, though… I could not give any less of a sh*t what you think or what you do. I only care insomuch as to the degree in which it constantly interrupts the discussions I love having with people here about movies and TV. Do you know why I don't care what you think? Because you and others like you spend the vast majority of your time on this site posting in a hard-right extremist echo chamber that is mocked mercilessly by the world outside of it, a message board that is notorious for its delusion, and a place I've personally witnessed time and again reinforce that it is, in fact, a cesspool of little equal. Not because of its views - again, I lean way more right than you guys think - but because of the way it chooses to express its views, and the way in which it lacks any empathy whatsoever for anyone who doesn't fall in lockstep with its views. Anyone who posts there as much as you do cannot possibly have a firm grip on reality. Moreover, you are someone who seemingly sees the world strictly through politics - who rabidly defines themselves through their politics - and in my experience, people who do just that simply aren't worth engaging in any serious manner.

So, please, I beg you, STOP watching these movies, STOP watching these TV shows. We don't need your money. We don't want your money. Just STOP coming here to virtue signal and soapbox and suck any and all fun out of the apolitical conversations we're trying to have about the things we love.
Boo Weekley
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Quote:

that it's not that you're saying negative things about Hollywood, rather it's the frequency in which it interrupts our conversations,
Yet you ignore the frequency with which Hollywood injects its politics or hypocritical preachiness. You realize if they didn't inundate us with this, there would be little to no political discourse on the Ent board right? You do realize Hollywood is at least part of the reason politics sometimes bleeds over to this board right? He literally mocks some of the people on here out of his own vaccine ignorance (unless the other posters are lying), and you and others throw a tantrum when people point this out and respond to him in kind. My company was about to fire me and some of my good friends at work because we had nature's vaccine, but not the one Hollywood's hero (Joe Biden the f-tard) decreed and tried to ruin our livelihoods over, so F Aziz and anyone who pokes fun at the so called "anti-vax" crowd, who actually follows the science.

Are you baffled as to why people would bring up politics in a thread devoted to the Grammy's when the winners inject political venom and preachiness in their acceptance speeches? You seem to have ZERO problems with them doing it. Only random people on the internet responding to it.

And yes, the other day, you tried to make the argument that Hollywood wasn't insanely liberal. Which we all know it is. If any actor decided to pump up xxx Republican candidate for prez, you and I both know they'd be boo'd out of the auditorium and possibly blackballed from any good jobs going fwd. At the least forced into an apology. If a leftist actor quoted Karl Marx or Mao Zedong on the podium, there would be zero consequence, they'd prob even be considered heroic.

Good day.
double aught
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Why are you still arguing about a show you haven't seen? You should watch it. Some of the things Aziz says might surprise you.
Brian Earl Spilner
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
boy09
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Boo Weekley said:

And yes, the other day, you tried to make the argument that Hollywood wasn't insanely liberal. Which we all know it is. If any actor decided to pump up xxx Republican candidate for prez, you and I both know they'd be boo'd out of the auditorium and possibly blackballed from any good jobs going fwd. At the least forced into an apology. If a leftist actor quoted Karl Marx or Mao Zedong on the podium, there would be zero consequence, they'd prob even be considered heroic.
The ol' "making up a guy to get mad at" tactic. Nice

It's pretty amazing how persistent you are in telling someone that their lived experiences are wrong..
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Boo Weekley said:


Quote:

that it's not that you're saying negative things about Hollywood, rather it's the frequency in which it interrupts our conversations,
Yet you ignore the frequency with which Hollywood injects its politics or hypocritical preachiness. You realize if they didn't inundate us with this, there would be little to no political discourse on the Ent board right? You do realize Hollywood is at least part of the reason politics sometimes bleeds over to this board right? He literally mocks some of the people on here out of his own vaccine ignorance (unless the other posters are lying), and you and others throw a tantrum when people point this out and respond to him in kind. My company was about to fire me and some of my good friends at work because we had nature's vaccine, but not the one Hollywood's hero (Joe Biden the f-tard) decreed and tried to ruin our livelihoods over, so F Aziz and anyone who pokes fun at the so called "anti-vax" crowd, who actually follows the science.

Are you baffled as to why people would bring up politics in a thread devoted to the Grammy's when the winners inject political venom and preachiness in their acceptance speeches? You seem to have ZERO problems with them doing it. Only random people on the internet responding to it.

And yes, the other day, you tried to make the argument that Hollywood wasn't insanely liberal. Which we all know it is. If any actor decided to pump up xxx Republican candidate for prez, you and I both know they'd be boo'd out of the auditorium and possibly blackballed from any good jobs going fwd. At the least forced into an apology. If a leftist actor quoted Karl Marx or Mao Zedong on the podium, there would be zero consequence, they'd prob even be considered heroic.

Good day.


Except that you have a POLITICAL forum at your disposal to discuss the POLITICAL leanings of Hollywood. While the ENTERTAINMENT forum, by and large, is reserved for discussion of the ENTERTAINMENT aspects of Hollywood.

It's no different than how the political aspects of Covid are constantly directed/re-routed to the political forum, while the *science* of Covid is reserved for the Covid forum.

I seriously don't understand why and how this concept is so hard to grasp for some of you.

Especially when you're never, ever going to convert or shame anyone here who doesn't already share your rigid world views/doesn't choose to define their existence through extreme, binary political lenses.
cajunaggie08
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Boo Weekley said:


Quote:

that it's not that you're saying negative things about Hollywood, rather it's the frequency in which it interrupts our conversations,
He literally mocks some of the people on here out of his own vaccine ignorance (unless the other posters are lying),
well they weren't being fully truthful or bothered to watch the other 25 minutes of the special
Duncan Idaho
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I guess the cold front hasn't reach your place. Such melting.
Duncan Idaho
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:


It's no different than how the political aspects of Covid are constantly directed/re-routed to the political forum, while the *science* of Covid is was reserved for the Covid forum.

Fify.

It long ago got over brigaded by the 16chan posters
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ugh. They really are like a virus.
GoAgs92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Finally watched this and while the points hes making are insightful, I only laughed a couple times.


Been watching a ton of comedy during Covid lockdown and this one is not great but still worth watching.
HerschelwoodHardhead
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Finally watched it today as well. I thought "man, I bet the right-leaning Texags people would actually be pleasantly surprised how Aziz was on their side. He actually made some compelling and funny arguments about how liberals should have compassion for conservative people that they typically demonize."

Boy was I wrong. I thought it was pretty funny though. Agreed that it was like a halfway finished set, still very much enjoyed it.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.