Entertainment
Sponsored by

Deep Water

1,681 Views | 7 Replies | Last: 3 yr ago by CoppellAg93
Four Seasons Landscaping
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
5:37p, 4/4/22
Was the book good?

Because outside of the obvious softcore porn value, that doesn't seem like something that should have been greenlit.
Reply Quote
1
AgNav93
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:47p, 4/4/22
AG
It should've been a Cinemax after dark movie.
Reply Quote
bluefire579
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:56p, 4/4/22
AG
The book was written in the 50s, so probably a lot more suggestive on the sex aspect than the movie seems like it will be. The author is the same one as Talented Mr. Ripley and Strangers on a Train, amongst others, so probably big on the suspense and psychological torment aspects.
Reply Quote
Brian Earl Spilner
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:03p, 4/4/22
AG
Movie sucked.
Reply Quote
1
Four Seasons Landscaping
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to bluefire579 • 7:32a, 4/5/22
The movie errs on the side of suggestive as well.

The forced parallels were WTF moments.

  • Affleck playing with his snails and the wife giving a guy a handjob in the car.
  • The daughter throws a suitcase in the pool and the old guy drives into a river.

Trying to figure out if I was too stupid to understand what they were getting at or if it was really as idiotic as it seemed.
Reply Quote
c-jags
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Four Seasons Landscaping • 8:27a, 4/5/22
Four Seasons Landscaping said:
The movie errs on the side of suggestive as well.

The forced parallels were WTF moments.

  • Affleck playing with his snails and the wife giving a guy a handjob in the car.
  • The daughter throws a suitcase in the pool and the old guy drives into a river.

Trying to figure out if I was too stupid to understand what they were getting at or if it was really as idiotic as it seemed.
it was the strangest movie. the acting wasn't bad. the sets and direction itself weren't bad.

but it was just bad.
Reply Quote
3
Straight Talk
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
5:56p, 4/13/22
AG
Judy watched last night. Not a complete waste of time but almost.
Reply Quote
1
CoppellAg93
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:02a, 4/25/22
AG
Seeing Ana De Armas half naked is never a bad thing. But that's about the only good thing in the movie.

The abrupt ending sealed the deal.
Reply Quote
1
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.