I don't think the women are suddenly coming forward, sounds more like a paper suddenly decided to make it newsworthy.
Quote:
A second woman alleges that Brand assaulted her when he was in his early 30s and she was 16 and still at school. She alleges he referred to her as "the child" during an emotionally abusive and controlling relationship
Not defending this behavior...but where did this occur and what was the age of consent there? Was this in Europe where the age of consent is often 15-16 and even 14 in a handful of countries, if I remember correctly? Or did it happen here, where it is usually 17-18?Quote:
This one it doesn't really matter if it was consensual or not. If there's any evidence to support they were having sex when he was in his 30s and she was 16 then he's in trouble. And if this one is true, the others look more true.
Prob the same people Rogan pissed off so much that they lied about him and smeared him constantly, and tried to get him cancelled as a "racist".cc10106 said:
But why all of a sudden? Who has Brand pissed off?
I just don't believe most accusations nowadays honestly. I KNOW that he used to be a drug fueled sex addicted POS. He has admitted to this.Macarthur said:
I find this defense of Brand really weird. This guy is a real piece of work, to say the least.
This is one area where I am actually rather liberal. If a murderer can clearly show convincingly that he has turned his life around and improved his character and become an asset and positive contributor to society, I am a proponent of some level of forgiveness or leniency in the form of a reduced sentence. It also depends on the circumstances surrounding the murder...i.e. was it a dope deal gone wrong, or was the guy a psychopathic serial killer...among other factors.Macarthur said:
If that same drugged out person killed someone, but we didn't find out until 15 years later, should they still pay a price?
Dimebag Darrell said:I just don't believe most accusations nowadays honestly. I KNOW that he used to be a drug fueled sex addicted POS. He has admitted to this.Macarthur said:
I find this defense of Brand really weird. This guy is a real piece of work, to say the least.
In a world where CNN alters Joe Rogan to make him look green, the FBI colludes with tech and media companies to influence an election, weaponized federal agencies collude to bring down a president with a fake "Russia Collusion" hoax, Kavanaugh has politically driven sexual assault and beer drinking charges levied against him, and countless racial and sexual hoaxes and hit jobs have been perpetrated, I just refuse to blindly trust anyone when it comes to this stuff. Oh yeah, can't forget Clarence Thomas facing worse than Kavanaugh did.
He may very well have done everything he's accused of. If so, I hope he faces justice.
But there is grey area when it comes to rape and sexual misconduct. And there are probably times when women wake up after crazy drunken sex and deeply regret it and are horrified. And then there are all too often straight up hit-job hoaxes.
I will amend my statute of limitations statement up above...if he truly raped or sexually assaulted these women, he needs to be punished accordingly, even 10-15 years later.
You consider Bill Cosby to be in the same category as Brand and Rogan?Dimebag Darrell said:Prob the same people Rogan pissed off so much that they lied about him and smeared him constantly, and tried to get him cancelled as a "racist".cc10106 said:
But why all of a sudden? Who has Brand pissed off?
I don't recall. I will be completely honest and admit that I did not believe that one at first. Then I didn't want to believe it. Then I was disgusted by it because he was someone I loved from childhood and I always thought he was a good decent family man.Danger Mouse said:You consider Bill Cosby to be in the same category as Brand and Rogan?Dimebag Darrell said:Prob the same people Rogan pissed off so much that they lied about him and smeared him constantly, and tried to get him cancelled as a "racist".cc10106 said:
But why all of a sudden? Who has Brand pissed off?
Cosby had little-to-no defenders on this board when people came out of the woodworks to accuse him of things that happened so long ago that few of us were alive.
Dimebag Darrell said:I don't recall. I will be completely honest and admit that I did not believe that one at first. Then I didn't want to believe it. Then I was disgusted by it because he was someone I loved from childhood and I always thought he was a good decent family man.Danger Mouse said:You consider Bill Cosby to be in the same category as Brand and Rogan?Dimebag Darrell said:Prob the same people Rogan pissed off so much that they lied about him and smeared him constantly, and tried to get him cancelled as a "racist".cc10106 said:
But why all of a sudden? Who has Brand pissed off?
Cosby had little-to-no defenders on this board when people came out of the woodworks to accuse him of things that happened so long ago that few of us were alive.
I am not trying to make the argument that everyone accused of rape is the victim of smear campaign or hoax. I have just witnessed enough outright hoaxes and accusations in the past handful of years to wait and see how things play out. I have a feeling the Brand stuff is coordinated and politically driven, like the stuff against Rogan was...I could be wrong.
Even in high profile cases decades after the fact? i.e. Kavanaugh, Clarence Thomas type cases? Haven't numerous athletes been exonerated after such false claims too?Macarthur said:Dimebag Darrell said:I just don't believe most accusations nowadays honestly. I KNOW that he used to be a drug fueled sex addicted POS. He has admitted to this.Macarthur said:
I find this defense of Brand really weird. This guy is a real piece of work, to say the least.
In a world where CNN alters Joe Rogan to make him look green, the FBI colludes with tech and media companies to influence an election, weaponized federal agencies collude to bring down a president with a fake "Russia Collusion" hoax, Kavanaugh has politically driven sexual assault and beer drinking charges levied against him, and countless racial and sexual hoaxes and hit jobs have been perpetrated, I just refuse to blindly trust anyone when it comes to this stuff. Oh yeah, can't forget Clarence Thomas facing worse than Kavanaugh did.
He may very well have done everything he's accused of. If so, I hope he faces justice.
But there is grey area when it comes to rape and sexual misconduct. And there are probably times when women wake up after crazy drunken sex and deeply regret it and are horrified. And then there are all too often straight up hit-job hoaxes.
I will amend my statute of limitations statement up above...if he truly raped or sexually assaulted these women, he needs to be punished accordingly, even 10-15 years later.
I think this is a strange narrative and point of fixation. Hard numbers are difficult to pin down, but it's been widely accepted that false reports of rape are somewhere around 5% of reported cases. And when you consider that some estimates are that as much as 60% of sexual assaults go completely UNREPORTED, I think the fixation should be on the the victims of sexual assault and not the very small % of false claims. Those women should be punished harshly but to focus on the incredibly small number of men's lives that have been affected by this when compared to the overwhleming number of women and their families whose lives have been forever altered is incredibly misguided.
No one should be defending Russell Brand right now.
— Ed Krassenstein (@EdKrassen) September 19, 2023
No one should be outright claiming that Russell Brand is guilty right now except for his possible victims and their friends/family.
Megyn Kelly did an amazing job touching on this.
Just because you may feel that the MeToo… pic.twitter.com/ud1ZzWjxk5
Yes, I know that way too often victims do not pursue justice for various reasons. I don't mean to judge them either.Macarthur said:I don't know, but if you read stories about women that are victims of these crimes, it doesn't take long for you to realize why they don't always pursue these things.cc10106 said:
But why all of a sudden? Who has Brand pissed off?
Nascar "noose", Juicy Smollet, Kavanaugh, Clarence Thomas, Rogan, Trump Russia Collusion, fake racist windshield note at A&M, I know a guy who is rich and was falsely accused but had his reputation almost damaged forever, Jeremy Piven, Michael Fassbender, a couple high profile fake Ivy league "rape" incidents, David Ebanks (nba player), Julian Edelman (nfl player) I seem to recall?...and more that just don't come to mind.Macarthur said:Dimebag Darrell said:I don't recall. I will be completely honest and admit that I did not believe that one at first. Then I didn't want to believe it. Then I was disgusted by it because he was someone I loved from childhood and I always thought he was a good decent family man.Danger Mouse said:You consider Bill Cosby to be in the same category as Brand and Rogan?Dimebag Darrell said:Prob the same people Rogan pissed off so much that they lied about him and smeared him constantly, and tried to get him cancelled as a "racist".cc10106 said:
But why all of a sudden? Who has Brand pissed off?
Cosby had little-to-no defenders on this board when people came out of the woodworks to accuse him of things that happened so long ago that few of us were alive.
I am not trying to make the argument that everyone accused of rape is the victim of smear campaign or hoax. I have just witnessed enough outright hoaxes and accusations in the past handful of years to wait and see how things play out. I have a feeling the Brand stuff is coordinated and politically driven, like the stuff against Rogan was...I could be wrong.
Which ones exactly?
We will never agree, we never were going to. G'dayMacarthur said:
You keep saying you think and most likely. I'm really not interested in dealing w those comments. Is there some real data we can look at?
And I have no ability to convict or condemn anyone. And let's be very clear, the court of public opinion does not require the same thing that an actual court of law does.
And you made it pretty clear by your comments that you think this is political. I do not.
I bet there is nothing outside of legal cannabis that you and I will ever agree on politically. But I was editing my statement above...maybe we can agree on that?Macarthur said:
good grief...
Claude! said:
I don't think we should believe all women. I think we should take all allegations seriously until it is time to not take them seriously, which is a very fact-intensive standard. That could be as soon as the allegation is made, i.e., "the ghost of Marlon Brando assaulted me on a space ship in 2020", or it could be never in the case of a conviction beyond a reasonable doubt.
You've written like 80% of an updated "We Didn't Start the Fire" here.Dimebag Darrell said:
Nascar "noose", Juicy Smollet, Kavanaugh, Clarence Thomas, Rogan, Trump Russia Collusion, fake racist windshield note at A&M, I know a guy who is rich and was falsely accused but had his reputation almost damaged forever, Jeremy Piven, Michael Fassbender, a couple high profile fake Ivy league "rape" incidents, David Ebanks (nba player), Julian Edelman (nfl player) I seem to recall?...and more that just don't come to mind.
Rogan, Thomas, KavanaughThe Porkchop Express said:You've written like 80% of an updated "We Didn't Start the Fire" here.Dimebag Darrell said:
Nascar "noose", Juicy Smollet, Kavanaugh, Clarence Thomas, Rogan, Trump Russia Collusion, fake racist windshield note at A&M, I know a guy who is rich and was falsely accused but had his reputation almost damaged forever, Jeremy Piven, Michael Fassbender, a couple high profile fake Ivy league "rape" incidents, David Ebanks (nba player), Julian Edelman (nfl player) I seem to recall?...and more that just don't come to mind.
i haven't seen such dramatic use of hand gestures while talking since...well, russell brandTCTTS said:No one should be defending Russell Brand right now.
— Ed Krassenstein (@EdKrassen) September 19, 2023
No one should be outright claiming that Russell Brand is guilty right now except for his possible victims and their friends/family.
Megyn Kelly did an amazing job touching on this.
Just because you may feel that the MeToo… pic.twitter.com/ud1ZzWjxk5
She and her family know that the rapist will almost certainly rape again. Whether they condone it or not is irrelevant. By remaining silent, they are willingly allowing that to happen.Macarthur said:
And again, this points to you not exchanging in good faith. The fact that a woman doesn't report something right away, doesn't mean she or her family condone more rape by the perpetrator.