The sanderlanche feels like it started page 1
Fighting Texas Aggie Class of 2012
Lathspell said:
Speaking of the Heralds, Brandon finally giving us Taln going all out off screen kind of pissed me off. I get what he was going for here, but couldn't he have given us someone's POV watching the greatest warrior in the history of Roshar laying waste to Fused and Regals? We didn't get enough of our badass heroes being badass heroes in this book, and seeing that sure would have helped.
bangobango said:
Finished this morning. Long ass book.
Best line of the book, and a laugh out louder for me:
"I'm his therapist."
Saxsoon said:bangobango said:
Finished this morning. Long ass book.
Best line of the book, and a laugh out louder for me:
"I'm his therapist."
What's funny is that one is getting dragged on r/fantasy
People who say they have DNF'd this book because of some of the anachronisms in language and Brandon's writing I can't take seriously
Was some of it odd sure. But to DNF, he'll no
Saxsoon said:
That's the funny part
That one didn't bother me as much honestly and frankly r/fantasy have much less reading comprehension than they like to believe
Maya calling Adolin a **** threw me off though
bangobango said:
Wit makes a joke about Sadeus and sl*ts in the Way of Kings. I remember that line specifically because it was jarring when I first read it.
I'm pretty sure there is previous setup between Wit and Kaladin about therapy and therapist.
Sanderson is going to hopefully learn that all those people praising him for putting representation in the books and portraying mental health will be the first ones to turn on him the second that they don't think he is doing it right. There is no appeasing those types.
CapCityAg89 said:bangobango said:
Wit makes a joke about Sadeus and sl*ts in the Way of Kings. I remember that line specifically because it was jarring when I first read it.
I'm pretty sure there is previous setup between Wit and Kaladin about therapy and therapist.
Sanderson is going to hopefully learn that all those people praising him for putting representation in the books and portraying mental health will be the first ones to turn on him the second that they don't think he is doing it right. There is no appeasing those types.
1. Sanderson 100% includes "those types" in his research and writing.
2. He is very in tune and conscious of the impacts of mental health challenges. He's fine there.
3. Brandon, despite being Mormon, is very liberal. If you don't like "DEI" type messages, you probably shouldn't read his books. It's all over the place - humans being voidbringers, Jasnah and her changes to male hierarchy, gay characters struggling with acceptance, lighteyed sense of god-given genetic superiority- those are just the obvious things.
CapCityAg89 said:bangobango said:
Wit makes a joke about Sadeus and sl*ts in the Way of Kings. I remember that line specifically because it was jarring when I first read it.
I'm pretty sure there is previous setup between Wit and Kaladin about therapy and therapist.
Sanderson is going to hopefully learn that all those people praising him for putting representation in the books and portraying mental health will be the first ones to turn on him the second that they don't think he is doing it right. There is no appeasing those types.
1. Sanderson 100% includes "those types" in his research and writing.
2. He is very in tune and conscious of the impacts of mental health challenges. He's fine there.
3. Brandon, despite being Mormon, is very liberal. If you don't like "DEI" type messages, you probably shouldn't read his books. It's all over the place - humans being voidbringers, Jasnah and her changes to male hierarchy, gay characters struggling with acceptance, lighteyed sense of god-given genetic superiority- those are just the obvious things.
Quote:
Good question, and I have noticed this criticism. I'll watch it in future Stormlight books, but I can't say that I think Wind and Truth is much beyond my other novels. I just went back and re-read the first few chapters of Elantris, and to me, they use the same conversational, modern tone in the dialogue as you see in Wind and Truth. I feel like this hasn't changed--and I've been getting these criticisms since the early days, with phrases like "Homicidal Hat Trick" in era one Mistborn or even "okay" instead of "all right" in Elantris.
I use Tolkien's philosophy on fantasy diction, even if I don't use his stylings: the dialogue is in translation, done by me, from their original form in the Cosmere. You don't think people back in the middle ages said things like, "Just a sec?" Sure, they might have had their own idioms and contractions, but if you were speaking to them in their tongue, at the time, I'm convinced it would sound modern. Vernor Vinge, one of my favorite SF authors, took this approach in A Fire Upon The Deep, making the (very alien) aliens talk in what feels like a very conversational, everyday English with one another. A way of saying, "They are not some unknowable strange group; they are people, like you, and if you could understand them as intimately as they understand each other, it would FEEL like this."
The thing is, one of my biggest comparisons in fiction is GRRM, who prefers a deliberately elegant, antiquated style (punctuated by the proper vulgarities, of course) for his fantasy, much as Robert Jordan did and Sapkowski still does. They'll reverse clause orders to give a slightly more formal feel to the sentences, they'll drop contractions in favor of full write outs sometimes where it doesn't feel awkward, they'll use older versions of words (again, when it doesn't feel awkward) and rearrange explanations to fit in uses of "whom." All very subtle ways of writing to give just a hint of an older way of speaking, evoking not actual medieval writing, but more an 1800s flair in order to give it just that hint of antiquity. (Note that newer writers get this wrong. It's not about using "tis" and "verily." It's about just a hint--a 5% turn of the dial--toward formality. GRRM particularly does this in narrative, rather than dialogue.)
In this, they prefer Tolkien stylings, not just his philosophy. (Though few could get away with going as far as he did.) This is a very 80s and 90s style for fantasy, while I generally favor a more science fiction authory style, coming from people like Isaac Asimov or Kurt Vonnegut. (And Orwell, as I've mentioned before.) I'm writing about groups, generally, in the middle of industrial revolutions, undergoing political upheaval as they modernize, with access to world-wide, instantaneous communication. (Seons on Sel, Spanreeds on Roshar, radio on Scadrial.) I, therefore, usually want to evoke a different feeling than an ancient or middle ages one.
So yes, it's a stylistic choice--but within reason. If I'm consistently kicking people out of the books with it, then I'm likely still doing something wrong, and perhaps should reexamine. I do often, in Stormlight, cut "okay" in favor of "all right" and other things to give it just a slightly more antiquated feel--but I don't go full GRRM.
Perhaps the answer, then, is: "It's a mix. In general, this is my stylistic choice--but I'll double-check that I'm not going too far, and maybe take a little more care." While I can disagree with the fans, that doesn't mean an individual is wrong for their interpretation of a piece of art. You get to decide if this is too far, and I'll decide if I should re-evaluate when I hit book six. That said, if it helps you, remember that this is in translation by English from someone doing their best to evoke the TONE of what the characters are saying in their own language, and someone who perhaps sometimes errs on the side of familiarity in favor of humanization.
Ornithopter said:
Feels like if Sanderson style of writing in WaT was a big hangup, you should have noticed in one of the four 800+ books you've already read in the series.