I was speaking with Protestants again, and have found that they prefer a cross without corpus, because "Christ is no longer hanging on the cross".
I mentioned to them that the cross itself is no longer standing either, so if they're going to show the cross itself at some time, why not with God's supreme sacrifice being shown, and they mentioned it was somehow humiliating to Christ.
My question is, if the cross is supposed to resemble the cross that Jesus was crucified on, why aren't there nail holes and blood smeared on it?
I don't understand why the cross means anything if not for the sacrifice of Christ. It's just a wooden-T without Christ's sacrifice.
I mentioned to them that the cross itself is no longer standing either, so if they're going to show the cross itself at some time, why not with God's supreme sacrifice being shown, and they mentioned it was somehow humiliating to Christ.
My question is, if the cross is supposed to resemble the cross that Jesus was crucified on, why aren't there nail holes and blood smeared on it?
I don't understand why the cross means anything if not for the sacrifice of Christ. It's just a wooden-T without Christ's sacrifice.