sicandtiredTXN said:
He gave five accounts of the Hoax to five different interviews by officers immediately after the reported Hoax
Then a month later he was interviewed again by a detective and that was the account that was acquitted.
I was literally trying to clarify
here's the breakdown
Count 1 accuses him of telling responding Chicago Police Officer Muhammed Baig at around 2:45 a.m., some 45 minutes after the purported attack, that he was the victim of a hate crime. He said two attackers put a rope around his neck.
Count 2 refers to Smollett telling the same officer he was a victim of a battery, describing attackers beating and pouring bleach on him.
Counts 3 and 4 are when Smollett made the same claims but to a different officer, Kimberly Murray, later that morning, at just before 6 a.m.
Count 5 accuses Smollett of again telling Murray at around 7:15 p.m. that he was the victim of a battery.
Count 6 refers to Smollett reporting on Feb. 14, 2019, to detective Robert Graves that he'd been a victim of an aggravated battery.
“Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience" - Mark Twain