SpaceX and other space news updates

1,487,254 Views | 16359 Replies | Last: 2 hrs ago by Sea Speed
YellowPot_97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Which launch was this? Was it the crewed mission?
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
YellowPot_97 said:

Which launch was this? Was it the crewed mission?
Yes
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
NASAg03
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Premium said:

NASAg03 said:

LTV mockups due today from the three competitors. Functional prototypes due in November. Here's the rollout for Intuitive Machines.




Nice marketing but that lunar rover looked lame. They should make one that is enclosed with oxygen for longer treks.
Other companies are developing a pressurized lunar rover, but that's significantly more expensive, heavier, and requires far more complexity. No matter the vehicle, astronauts are going to want to get boots on the ground.

Making a rover that doesn't require EVA suits means you need a design that allows for astronauts to put it on while also keeping lunar dust out of the vehicle. That's a huge challenge. NASA has some developmental mockups for such a design.

At the very least you need a docking port to dock with a lunar lander or a space habitat, and again a method to clean the port before mating and opening.

For these three proposed rovers, all you need is an extra set of EVA O2 tanks to extend the range. Ours has a truck bed and trailer for such storage.
AtticusMatlock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The orbital part of the mission went as planned. To avoid unnecessary space debris, SpaceX deorbits the upper stage to crash into the ocean. When the engines relit to deorbit there was some sort of anomaly and it hit the ocean outside of the target range.
AtticusMatlock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ULA is rolling Vulcan out to the pad today for their second launch.
Premium
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
NASAg03 said:

Premium said:

NASAg03 said:

LTV mockups due today from the three competitors. Functional prototypes due in November. Here's the rollout for Intuitive Machines.




Nice marketing but that lunar rover looked lame. They should make one that is enclosed with oxygen for longer treks.
Other companies are developing a pressurized lunar rover, but that's significantly more expensive, heavier, and requires far more complexity. No matter the vehicle, astronauts are going to want to get boots on the ground.

Making a rover that doesn't require EVA suits means you need a design that allows for astronauts to put it on while also keeping lunar dust out of the vehicle. That's a huge challenge. NASA has some developmental mockups for such a design.

At the very least you need a docking port to dock with a lunar lander or a space habitat, and again a method to clean the port before mating and opening.

For these three proposed rovers, all you need is an extra set of EVA O2 tanks to extend the range. Ours has a truck bed and trailer for such storage.


Thanks for all of the detailed reply. Do you know why dust is so important to not bring back in other than annoyance?
lb3
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
NASAg03 said:

Premium said:

NASAg03 said:

LTV mockups due today from the three competitors. Functional prototypes due in November. Here's the rollout for Intuitive Machines.




Nice marketing but that lunar rover looked lame. They should make one that is enclosed with oxygen for longer treks.
Other companies are developing a pressurized lunar rover, but that's significantly more expensive, heavier, and requires far more complexity. No matter the vehicle, astronauts are going to want to get boots on the ground.

Making a rover that doesn't require EVA suits means you need a design that allows for astronauts to put it on while also keeping lunar dust out of the vehicle. That's a huge challenge. NASA has some developmental mockups for such a design.

At the very least you need a docking port to dock with a lunar lander or a space habitat, and again a method to clean the port before mating and opening.

For these three proposed rovers, all you need is an extra set of EVA O2 tanks to extend the range. Ours has a truck bed and trailer for such storage.
I'm not aware of anyone designing a pressurized rover outside of JAXA.

NASA rover concept where you use a suit like the Orlan that has a rear entry hatch. The crew member then mates the back of their suit to the back of the rover allowing the crew to open the rear suit hatch and crawl inside the pressurized rover's airlock, leaving most of the dust outside the rover.

NASAg03
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Lunar dust is highly abrasive. Think glass powder than hasn't been worn down by wind and water. It's also highly irritant to skin and lungs and may be carcinogenic.
NASAg03
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Toyota and Mitsubishi Heavy are teaming up to support NAsA and JAXA. Looks promising but only an artists / proposal concept.



https://www.spacescout.info/2024/06/meet-the-pressurized-rover/
CW Griswold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Best imagined rover

AtticusMatlock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
NASAg03 said:

Toyota and Mitsubishi Heavy are teaming up to support NAsA and JAXA. Looks promising but only an artists / proposal concept.



https://www.spacescout.info/2024/06/meet-the-pressurized-rover/
Looks like the Armageddon Armadillo, sans drill rig.
Ag83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
NASAg03 said:

Lunar dust is highly abrasive. Think glass powder than hasn't been worn down by wind and water. It's also highly irritant to skin and lungs and may be carcinogenic.
It's also electrostatic and clings to everything. Gene Cernan said it would be the #1 challenge to long term lunar operations. I'd say he was probably correct.
fullback44
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
One of the best threads on Texags… not even sure why it's in the politics forum but I'm ok with it .. Elon just keeps rolling with his projects
Sea Speed
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Well considering how much the feds are trying to dick around SpaceX and the largest space program in the country is run by the feds, I think it fits.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Eric bringing/highlighting some heat.



Quote:

NASA cannot succeed until fact-based reality supplants political expediency as the agency's guiding star.
Here is a radical prescription to restore NASA's ability to deliver value to the US taxpayer.
Measure and reward productivity.

Pay people, promote people, and fire people. NASA today is unable to pay competitive wages, unwilling to promote and reward competence, and unable to remove poor performers. Solve for the equilibrium, and it's a miracle it gets anything done at all.

I have an unpublishable blog post documenting all the times, in four years at NASA JPL, I personally was punished for making the cardinal error of committing to writing ways I had found to save significant sums of money or time in the schedule. It's a subjective observation but at the same time, the entire org was unable to retain young ambitious talent, unable to remove underperformers, and as the record shows, unable to deliver missions remotely on time and budget. It seems crazy that any organization would be so aggressively disinterested in improving productivity, or even slowing its decline, but it is a common failure mode particularly of large bureaucratic organizations. In private industry, they eventually go bankrupt but the government can always print more money.

Stop blaming Congress for mandating bad programs. Grow a spine. How is Congress meant to know what's a good idea in space? NASA's mission is both niche and esoteric. NASA's leadership needs to advocate for missions that advance its interests, and policies that continually improve its competence to deliver. The last two decades of rolling over in the face of Congress' bullying over what has become the SLS has delivered nothing but cascading failure failing missions, failing leaders, and failing resolve to explore the universe. If NASA's leadership is unable to prevail upon Congress to stop accelerating the destruction of their agency (i.e. do their jobs) they should resign in favor of leaders who can.

In the coming months, a new administration will formulate a new space policy. If you're in line to be NASA administrator, the most significant bit (0 or 1) defining your tenure will be your ability to excise this malignant growth from the face of US space exploration. Nothing else matters in comparison. Either you lead NASA beyond SLS or you do not lead at all.
Truth.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Curiosity needs AAA. Where's Elon Musk when you need him?

Also, who goes 11 years without replacing their tires? NASA needs to up their maintenance game!

Decay
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Interesting. I'm assuming it's not rubber since the temps there are so low. I bet most plastic would become brittle and break after years of that kind of exposure.
AgBQ-00
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I don't know if it is, but looks like carbon fiber
You do not have a soul. You are a soul that has a body.

We sing Hallelujah! The Lamb has overcome!
lb3
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I always thought they were aluminum. Will go try to find some details.
lb3
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


n_touch
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u said:

Curiosity needs AAA. Where's Elon Musk when you need him?

Also, who goes 11 years without replacing their tires? NASA needs to up their maintenance game!


Doesn't seem to be smart to keep the soundstage that cold. High utility cost and wear and tear on gear.
AgBQ-00
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
That makes sense. Thanks!!
You do not have a soul. You are a soul that has a body.

We sing Hallelujah! The Lamb has overcome!
Decay
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Wow so even metal couldn't hold up. Goes to show how hard it'll be to live there if we ever do try.
OnlyForNow
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I get it.
Mathguy64
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This just in. It's very cold on Mars. And cold metal is brittle metal.

Every set of wheels on every rover had these issues.
Sea Speed
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Was listening to a podcast that talked about using AI for metallurgy the other day and seems like this would be a perfect use case for that.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Sea Speed said:

Was listening to a podcast that talked about using AI for metallurgy the other day and seems like this would be a perfect use case for that.
Metallurgy (and materials sciences broadly) and AI make a lot of sense to me, looking forward. Drug companies have sort of pioneered this with their compound research already, but metallurgy will require more integration/heat/component mixes to validate theories and systematically advance.

It could impact the space race, for sure, and I would hazard a guess SpaceX will be one of the leaders, though Sierra and others have definitely expressed an intent to invest in it as well.
NASAg03
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm guessing those were made of aluminum 7075-T7351, which is a very high-strength alloy. And it gets stronger at colder temperatures. However, aluminum does suffer from fatigue failure, which is most likely the failure you see.

Considering Curiosity was designed for a 2-year mission (and is on year 12), this failure isn't a surprise or a knock against the design. You don't design a race car to survive 10 races. You design to just finish one race - otherwise that's wasted mass.

This especially applies to hardware that's sent to Mars. You design to the minimum margins to maximize payload mass for the mission duration. If anything you could argue these wheels were overdesigned.

https://www.matweb.com/search/datasheet_print.aspx?matguid=6653b72914864cc0a0ff7adf5b720167
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Great video, the Atlan and AN-225 discussion are in particularly excellent.



Of course, in most/all respects the An-225 was a Ukrainian creation, very sad end.



Is Vulcan really potentially launching this am?

nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


Looks like they made it:

TriAg2010
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Second time this year we've seen someone dodge a bullet.
FTAG 2000
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Did anyone see the booster engine on Vulcan go boom during the launch? About 30-40 seconds in.
FTAG 2000
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG



nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yeah that was apparently a pretty close call.



Kept running afterward, must have been something digested by a turbo pump getting fired through?
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I am sure a ULA mishap investigation is forthcoming. And will ground Vulcan for months. /s
First Page Last Page
Page 409 of 468
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.