YesYellowPot_97 said:
Which launch was this? Was it the crewed mission?
Other companies are developing a pressurized lunar rover, but that's significantly more expensive, heavier, and requires far more complexity. No matter the vehicle, astronauts are going to want to get boots on the ground.Premium said:NASAg03 said:
LTV mockups due today from the three competitors. Functional prototypes due in November. Here's the rollout for Intuitive Machines.Apollo astronauts made history by driving the Lunar Roving Vehicle across the Moon’s surface. Now, their insights are helping push the frontier further with the Moon RACER team’s next-gen Lunar Terrain Vehicle. The team is delivering a static mock-up to @NASA_Johnson for… pic.twitter.com/nq5c8rosni
— Intuitive Machines (@Int_Machines) September 27, 2024
Nice marketing but that lunar rover looked lame. They should make one that is enclosed with oxygen for longer treks.
NASAg03 said:Other companies are developing a pressurized lunar rover, but that's significantly more expensive, heavier, and requires far more complexity. No matter the vehicle, astronauts are going to want to get boots on the ground.Premium said:NASAg03 said:
LTV mockups due today from the three competitors. Functional prototypes due in November. Here's the rollout for Intuitive Machines.Apollo astronauts made history by driving the Lunar Roving Vehicle across the Moon’s surface. Now, their insights are helping push the frontier further with the Moon RACER team’s next-gen Lunar Terrain Vehicle. The team is delivering a static mock-up to @NASA_Johnson for… pic.twitter.com/nq5c8rosni
— Intuitive Machines (@Int_Machines) September 27, 2024
Nice marketing but that lunar rover looked lame. They should make one that is enclosed with oxygen for longer treks.
Making a rover that doesn't require EVA suits means you need a design that allows for astronauts to put it on while also keeping lunar dust out of the vehicle. That's a huge challenge. NASA has some developmental mockups for such a design.
At the very least you need a docking port to dock with a lunar lander or a space habitat, and again a method to clean the port before mating and opening.
For these three proposed rovers, all you need is an extra set of EVA O2 tanks to extend the range. Ours has a truck bed and trailer for such storage.
I'm not aware of anyone designing a pressurized rover outside of JAXA.NASAg03 said:Other companies are developing a pressurized lunar rover, but that's significantly more expensive, heavier, and requires far more complexity. No matter the vehicle, astronauts are going to want to get boots on the ground.Premium said:NASAg03 said:
LTV mockups due today from the three competitors. Functional prototypes due in November. Here's the rollout for Intuitive Machines.Apollo astronauts made history by driving the Lunar Roving Vehicle across the Moon’s surface. Now, their insights are helping push the frontier further with the Moon RACER team’s next-gen Lunar Terrain Vehicle. The team is delivering a static mock-up to @NASA_Johnson for… pic.twitter.com/nq5c8rosni
— Intuitive Machines (@Int_Machines) September 27, 2024
Nice marketing but that lunar rover looked lame. They should make one that is enclosed with oxygen for longer treks.
Making a rover that doesn't require EVA suits means you need a design that allows for astronauts to put it on while also keeping lunar dust out of the vehicle. That's a huge challenge. NASA has some developmental mockups for such a design.
At the very least you need a docking port to dock with a lunar lander or a space habitat, and again a method to clean the port before mating and opening.
For these three proposed rovers, all you need is an extra set of EVA O2 tanks to extend the range. Ours has a truck bed and trailer for such storage.
Looks like the Armageddon Armadillo, sans drill rig.NASAg03 said:
Toyota and Mitsubishi Heavy are teaming up to support NAsA and JAXA. Looks promising but only an artists / proposal concept.
https://www.spacescout.info/2024/06/meet-the-pressurized-rover/
It's also electrostatic and clings to everything. Gene Cernan said it would be the #1 challenge to long term lunar operations. I'd say he was probably correct.NASAg03 said:
Lunar dust is highly abrasive. Think glass powder than hasn't been worn down by wind and water. It's also highly irritant to skin and lungs and may be carcinogenic.
It would be a shame if this found its way to a certain Artemis Discord server.https://t.co/Wz7kXOOONT
— Eric Berger (@SciGuySpace) October 2, 2024
Truth.Quote:
NASA cannot succeed until fact-based reality supplants political expediency as the agency's guiding star.
Here is a radical prescription to restore NASA's ability to deliver value to the US taxpayer.
Measure and reward productivity.
Pay people, promote people, and fire people. NASA today is unable to pay competitive wages, unwilling to promote and reward competence, and unable to remove poor performers. Solve for the equilibrium, and it's a miracle it gets anything done at all.
I have an unpublishable blog post documenting all the times, in four years at NASA JPL, I personally was punished for making the cardinal error of committing to writing ways I had found to save significant sums of money or time in the schedule. It's a subjective observation but at the same time, the entire org was unable to retain young ambitious talent, unable to remove underperformers, and as the record shows, unable to deliver missions remotely on time and budget. It seems crazy that any organization would be so aggressively disinterested in improving productivity, or even slowing its decline, but it is a common failure mode particularly of large bureaucratic organizations. In private industry, they eventually go bankrupt but the government can always print more money.
Stop blaming Congress for mandating bad programs. Grow a spine. How is Congress meant to know what's a good idea in space? NASA's mission is both niche and esoteric. NASA's leadership needs to advocate for missions that advance its interests, and policies that continually improve its competence to deliver. The last two decades of rolling over in the face of Congress' bullying over what has become the SLS has delivered nothing but cascading failure failing missions, failing leaders, and failing resolve to explore the universe. If NASA's leadership is unable to prevail upon Congress to stop accelerating the destruction of their agency (i.e. do their jobs) they should resign in favor of leaders who can.
In the coming months, a new administration will formulate a new space policy. If you're in line to be NASA administrator, the most significant bit (0 or 1) defining your tenure will be your ability to excise this malignant growth from the face of US space exploration. Nothing else matters in comparison. Either you lead NASA beyond SLS or you do not lead at all.
Doesn't seem to be smart to keep the soundstage that cold. High utility cost and wear and tear on gear.will25u said:
Curiosity needs AAA. Where's Elon Musk when you need him?
Also, who goes 11 years without replacing their tires? NASA needs to up their maintenance game!
Metallurgy (and materials sciences broadly) and AI make a lot of sense to me, looking forward. Drug companies have sort of pioneered this with their compound research already, but metallurgy will require more integration/heat/component mixes to validate theories and systematically advance.Sea Speed said:
Was listening to a podcast that talked about using AI for metallurgy the other day and seems like this would be a perfect use case for that.
What a great diagram, had no clue the first stage was so small pic.twitter.com/RuhuHTjqVF
— ben jamin (@jamin_ben1235) September 30, 2024
We are "go" for the launch of the #VulcanRocket on the #Cert2 flight test! The launch window opens Friday at 6 a.m. EDT (1000 UTC) from Cape Canaveral, FL. https://t.co/eWLyIiIUE6 pic.twitter.com/kWQ1nIvZ1b
— ULA (@ulalaunch) October 2, 2024
Unless something is done about the bureaucratic smothering of America, humanity will never reach the stars.
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) October 4, 2024
That is my biggest showstopper issue for why Trump must win, as the alternative is continued expansion of oppressive big government, making progress impossible.
Unless… https://t.co/hhNQDrAOCm
There go the solids. pic.twitter.com/MPiTyl9jFO
— Chris Bergin - NSF (@NASASpaceflight) October 4, 2024
Vulcan during the "observation" seen during ULA's Cert-2 mission this morning. Watch how the rocket moves to adjust after the flash.
— D Wise (@dwisecinema) October 4, 2024
📸 - @NASASpaceflight
📺 - https://t.co/uzKGo20deK pic.twitter.com/5z3vXxDwhY