Rosjanie ponownie wystrzelili pociski balistyczne.
— Artur Micek (@Artur_Micek) January 5, 2026
Russians have once again launched ballistic missiles.
Rosjanie ponownie wystrzelili pociski balistyczne.
— Artur Micek (@Artur_Micek) January 5, 2026
Rosjanie ewentualnie polują na stację radiolokacyjne zestawów Patriot w mojej ocenie.
— Artur Micek (@Artur_Micek) January 5, 2026
Myśliwce MiG-31K ponownie wracają na pozycję do ataku.
— Artur Micek (@Artur_Micek) January 5, 2026
TheGifGuy said:
What am I looking at here?
TheGifGuy said:
Got it, thanks!
Ag with kids said:74OA said:Ag with kids said:74OA said:
Ukraine's fate in 2026 will define the world we will live in. This is the reason why the war's outcome will affect every American.
"The Ukraine war is the ultimate test case because it is not merely a border dispute. It is a referendum on whether conquest is back-openly, unapologetically-in 21st-century geopolitics.
If Russia is allowed to seize territory by brute force and then, after sufficient destruction, have that seizure ratified through Western pressure on the victim, Ukraine, the lesson will echo far beyond Europe. It will be heard in every capital that lives in the shadow of a stronger neighbor, and especially so in an Asia increasingly dominated by China.
The rules-based international order will not be abolished with a speech. It will be hollowed out by precedent."
FATEQuote:
If Russia is allowed to seize territory by brute force and then, after sufficient destruction, have that seizure ratified through Western pressure on the victim, Ukraine, the lesson will echo far beyond Europe. It will be heard in every capital that lives in the shadow of a stronger neighbor and especially so in an Asia increasingly dominated by China. The rules-based international order will not be abolished with a speech. It will be hollowed out by precedent.
And if, on the other hand, Ukraine emerges in 2026 with a settlement that is genuinely defensible one that does not invite a rematch, one that provides long-term security serious enough to unlock reconstruction and investment then the West will have shown that deterrence is still possible, that alliances still mean something and that rogue powers cannot simply outlast democratic attention spans.
So, is Fareed stating that if the settlement happens and involves the seizure of territory it's unacceptable?
Those 2 paragraphs are mutually exclusive if any territory is transferred based on how he phrases the first paragraph.
That means, that this war will have to continue until Ukraine gets back every single inch of territory for it to be a "
settlement that is genuinely defensible"....
Read it again. He says if the West "ratifies" the land seizure by pressuring Ukraine into accepting its loss against its will that will encourage other tyrant's aggression. It is up to Ukraine alone to decide what sort of deal it can live with.
But any deal they take will be seen as acquiescence to US/EU demands or requests…
74OA said:Ag with kids said:74OA said:Ag with kids said:74OA said:
Ukraine's fate in 2026 will define the world we will live in. This is the reason why the war's outcome will affect every American.
"The Ukraine war is the ultimate test case because it is not merely a border dispute. It is a referendum on whether conquest is back-openly, unapologetically-in 21st-century geopolitics.
If Russia is allowed to seize territory by brute force and then, after sufficient destruction, have that seizure ratified through Western pressure on the victim, Ukraine, the lesson will echo far beyond Europe. It will be heard in every capital that lives in the shadow of a stronger neighbor, and especially so in an Asia increasingly dominated by China.
The rules-based international order will not be abolished with a speech. It will be hollowed out by precedent."
FATEQuote:
If Russia is allowed to seize territory by brute force and then, after sufficient destruction, have that seizure ratified through Western pressure on the victim, Ukraine, the lesson will echo far beyond Europe. It will be heard in every capital that lives in the shadow of a stronger neighbor and especially so in an Asia increasingly dominated by China. The rules-based international order will not be abolished with a speech. It will be hollowed out by precedent.
And if, on the other hand, Ukraine emerges in 2026 with a settlement that is genuinely defensible one that does not invite a rematch, one that provides long-term security serious enough to unlock reconstruction and investment then the West will have shown that deterrence is still possible, that alliances still mean something and that rogue powers cannot simply outlast democratic attention spans.
So, is Fareed stating that if the settlement happens and involves the seizure of territory it's unacceptable?
Those 2 paragraphs are mutually exclusive if any territory is transferred based on how he phrases the first paragraph.
That means, that this war will have to continue until Ukraine gets back every single inch of territory for it to be a "
settlement that is genuinely defensible"....
Read it again. He says if the West "ratifies" the land seizure by pressuring Ukraine into accepting its loss against its will that will encourage other tyrant's aggression. It is up to Ukraine alone to decide what sort of deal it can live with.
But any deal they take will be seen as acquiescence to US/EU demands or requests…
That's where the conditions in the second paragraph come into play and, again, they have to be acceptable to Ukraine.
Так, шоста ранку, по стратегічній авіації відбій, без видимих пусків будь-де.
— monitor (@war_monitor_ua) January 5, 2026
По Шахедах також чисто.
Вночі під атакою був Чернігів та Київ, є влучання і цивільну забудову.
Залишаємось на зв'язку.
Overnight, Ukrainian attack drones successfully struck one of Russia's largest battery manufacturers, the Energia plant in Yelets.
— OSINTtechnical (@Osinttechnical) January 5, 2026
Seen here, the plant burns after multiple Ukrainian drone hits. pic.twitter.com/BXOn194iWa
BREAKING:
— Astraia (@astraiaintel) January 5, 2026
Ukrainian forces have liberated the settlement of Dibrova!
🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦 https://t.co/n2Br7GeMRq pic.twitter.com/hZW7J4VIBN
Ukraine is winning!
— WW3finalboss (@WW3finalboss1) January 5, 2026
Ukraine will be free!
🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦
Ukrainian forces have advanced southeast of Oleksandrivka
This is one of the most significant advances since the liberation of Kupyansk pic.twitter.com/l6IRLhoyhQ
Overnight, Ukrainian attack drones successfully hit a Russian oil depot in the town of Usman, Lipetsk Oblast.
— OSINTtechnical (@Osinttechnical) January 6, 2026
Seen here, flames leap into the night sky from the burning facility. pic.twitter.com/EN6SRI2sXU
74OA said:
Ukraine pilots diverging from NATO training to deal with their particular combat reality. Interesting read.
TACTICS
aezmvp said:74OA said:
Ukraine pilots diverging from NATO training to deal with their particular combat reality. Interesting read.
TACTICS
I'm assuming they're still in a stand off firing position near the front lines. Would be interesting to see drones acting like WWI baloons carrying wires designed to damage aircraft.
Quote:
no more Iranian Shahed drone production in Venezuela
According to sources familiar with Tuesday's negotiations and summit featuring the “Coalition of the Willing” in Paris, participants, including European leaders, observed a “significant shift” in the United States' stance toward both Russia and Ukraine.
— OSINTdefender (@sentdefender) January 7, 2026
Representing the Trump… pic.twitter.com/dlO4hMuq5U
Quote:
These guarantees, similar to those under NATO's Article 5, would commit the United States to come to Ukraine's defense in the event of any future attack by Russia.
TRM said:Quote:
These guarantees, similar to those under NATO's Article 5, would commit the United States to come to Ukraine's defense in the event of any future attack by Russia.
How is that different than our agreement 30 yrs ago when we asked Ukraine to give up their nukes?
TRM said:Quote:
These guarantees, similar to those under NATO's Article 5, would commit the United States to come to Ukraine's defense in the event of any future attack by Russia.
How is that different than our agreement 30 yrs ago when we asked Ukraine to give up their nukes?
Here is what Starmer and Macron have signed up to once a Ukrainian peace deal is struck. British troops on the ground in Ukraine. Military hubs set up in country. Promises to act if Russia attacks again.
— Ben Riley-Smith (@benrileysmith) January 6, 2026
This is by far the most detailed readout to date on what the 'coalition of… pic.twitter.com/nzsSXmUEi5
ZELENSKYY: The documents are essentially ready. Following the signing of the declaration, the next step is the ratification of these security guarantees by the parliaments of each participating country, including the U.S. Congress.
— Kateryna Lisunova (@KaterynaLis) January 7, 2026
"The guarantees of the Coalition of the Willing… pic.twitter.com/T3eZyu0szn
TRM said:Quote:
These guarantees, similar to those under NATO's Article 5, would commit the United States to come to Ukraine's defense in the event of any future attack by Russia.
How is that different than our agreement 30 yrs ago when we asked Ukraine to give up their nukes?