When does Trump have to pay $355 MM?

120,518 Views | 1207 Replies | Last: 25 days ago by FrioAg 00
Stat Monitor Repairman
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Is this order constitutional when Defendant Trump is President of the United States?
itsyourboypookie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
New York court of appeals is set to toss this.

Op must be devastated
BMX Bandit
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

Is this order constitutional when Defendant Trump is President of the United States?


Yes

If this order survives appeal (which most on both sides don't expect) the issue becomes enforcement. If Trump violates the order, the judge can't force him to appear in court etc
fc2112
How long do you want to ignore this user?
itsyourboypookie said:

New York court of appeals is set to toss this.

Op must be devastated

Why? I simply asked a question. Go back and read the words.
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
fc2112 said:




Read the words like when you were literally counting down the days? lol

I'm Gipper
fc2112
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Point?
Muy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Try and enforce it, libs.
Pizza
How long do you want to ignore this user?
strbrst777 said:

Never!


This appears to be the correct answer. Collect your 50 texags bucks from PO box 1212, located in the steam tunnels.
HarleySpoon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
fc2112 said:

Point?
I could be wrong but I think that deplorable piece of garbage is saying "ha, ha, ha, you lose." But, he'd have to confirm that to be sure.
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The point is very clear. He was giddily counting down the days like a kid waiting for Christmas!

I'm Gipper
fc2112
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Im Gipper said:

The point is very clear. He was giddily counting down the days like a kid waiting for Christmas!
In your mind
TRADUCTOR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I have diagnosed the thread and proper medication will anchor thread.
aTmAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
fc2112 said:

Im Gipper said:

The point is very clear. He was giddily counting down the days like a kid waiting for Christmas!
In your mind
So why were you counting down then?
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Appeal is STILL pending... But DOJ looking at civil rights violation for Leticia James.

Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Pursue disbarment. And go after "judge" Marchan.
Pizza
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Everybody watching this unfold knew what was happening to DJT was wrong...except the OP.

Glad things are moving in the right direction.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
And guess who Queen Letitia has hired to defend her… good ol Abbe Lowell.

He starts by pointing out she has been targeted by Trump DOJ and how corrupt it is to target your political opponents.

That dude may have knowledge of the law but he has zero respect it.

https://www.msnbc.com/ali-velshi/watch/ny-ag-james-attorney-abbe-lowell-trump-has-turned-the-doj-into-the-department-of-weaponization-244673093579
techno-ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
flown-the-coop said:

And guess who Queen Letitia has hired to defend her… good ol Abbe Lowell.

He starts by pointing out she has been targeted by Trump DOJ and how corrupt it is to target your political opponents.

That dude may have knowledge of the law but he has zero respect it.

https://www.msnbc.com/ali-velshi/watch/ny-ag-james-attorney-abbe-lowell-trump-has-turned-the-doj-into-the-department-of-weaponization-244673093579




Uh…..

Is that not what they've been doing the last several years?
The left cannot kill the Spirit of Charlie Kirk.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

That dude may have knowledge of the law but he has zero respect it.


LOL. Bet Hunter Biden wouldn't agree. He really botched his cases. Dude still needed a massive pardon from Daddy after Abbe had worked his "legal magic."
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I did say "may" as I really have no idea. But you bring a good point about not delivering for Hunter on the deal.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
flown-the-coop said:

I did say "may" as I really have no idea. But you bring a good point about not delivering for Hunter on the deal.

Tishy better get a second opinion if Abbe brings her a plea deal. That didn't work out so well for Hunter.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
fc2112 said:

There has to be a deadline, eight? If appealing, he still has to put up?

Does he have $355 MM liquid? How do the finances work on this?

Short answer. Never.

NY Appeals just tossed it aside.

https://www.wral.com/story/appeals-court-throws-out-massive-civil-fraud-penalty-against-president-donald-trump/22126123/

Quote:

NEW YORK (AP) An appeals court has thrown out the massive civil fraud penalty against President Donald Trump, ruling Thursday in New York state's lawsuit accusing him of exaggerating his wealth.

The decision came seven months after the Republican returned to the White House. A panel of five judges in New York's mid-level Appellate Division said the verdict, which stood to cost Trump more than $515 million and rock his real estate empire, was "excessive."

After finding that Trump engaged in fraud by flagrantly padding financial statements that went to lenders and insurers, Judge Arthur Engoron ordered him last year to pay $355 million in penalties. With interest, the sum has topped $515 million.

The total combined with penalties levied on some other Trump Organization executives, including Trump's sons Eric and Donald Jr. now exceeds $527 million, with interest.

"While the injunctive relief ordered by the court is well crafted to curb defendants' business culture, the court's disgorgement order, which directs that defendants pay nearly half a billion dollars to the State of New York, is an excessive fine that violates the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution," Judges Dianne T. Renwick and Peter H. Moulton wrote in one of several opinions shaping the appeals court's ruling.

Engoron also imposed other punishments, such as banning Trump and his two eldest sons from serving in corporate leadership for a few years. Those provisions have been on pause during Trump's appeal, and he was able to hold off collection of the money by posting a $175 million bond.

The court, which was split on the merits of the lawsuit and the lower court's fraud finding, dismissed the penalty Engoron imposed in its entirety while also leaving a pathway for further appeals to the state's highest court, the Court of Appeals.

Apollo79
How long do you want to ignore this user?
flown-the-coop said:

fc2112 said:

There has to be a deadline, eight? If appealing, he still has to put up?

Does he have $355 MM liquid? How do the finances work on this?

Short answer. Never.

NY Appeals just tossed it aside. Link incoming.

ohhhhh thats gonna upset the OP.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Trump these days be like...
fc2112
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Apollo79 said:

flown-the-coop said:

fc2112 said:

There has to be a deadline, eight? If appealing, he still has to put up?

Does he have $355 MM liquid? How do the finances work on this?

Short answer. Never.

NY Appeals just tossed it aside. Link incoming.

ohhhhh thats gonna upset the OP.

Why would you think that? Cite quotes of mine that suggested I was happy about this.
VegasAg86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
flown-the-coop said:



Quote:

* * *

The court, which was split on the merits of the lawsuit and the lower court's fraud finding, dismissed the penalty Engoron imposed in its entirety while also leaving a pathway for further appeals to the state's highest court, the Court of Appeals.



It is disappointing that they split on the merits instead of overturning on the merits. Setting aside the penalty on 8th amendment grounds is nice, but the finding of fraud when no bank suffered or claimed any damages, and said they would continue to do business with Trump, is absurd.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

It is disappointing that they split on the merits instead of overturning on the merits. Setting aside the penalty on 8th amendment grounds is nice, but the finding of fraud when no bank suffered or claimed any damages, and said they would continue to do business with Trump, is absurd.

This case was a massive distortion of a state statute. I suspect the Court of Appeals will address that misuse.
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
fc2112 said:



SORRY YOUR COUNTDOWN LOST!!!

I'm Gipper
fc2112
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Im Gipper said:

fc2112 said:



SORRY YOUR COUNTDOWN LOST!!!

That does not indicate I was happy about this. Try again.
VegasAg86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
fc2112 said:

Im Gipper said:

fc2112 said:



SORRY YOUR COUNTDOWN LOST!!!

That does not indicate I was happy about this. Try again.

The number of people who think it means you're happy indicates you didn't communicate clearly.
fc2112
How long do you want to ignore this user?
VegasAg86 said:

fc2112 said:

Im Gipper said:

fc2112 said:



SORRY YOUR COUNTDOWN LOST!!!

That does not indicate I was happy about this. Try again.

The number of people who think it means you're happy indicates you didn't communicate clearly. their bias

FIFY
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
VegasAg86 said:

flown-the-coop said:



Quote:

* * *

The court, which was split on the merits of the lawsuit and the lower court's fraud finding, dismissed the penalty Engoron imposed in its entirety while also leaving a pathway for further appeals to the state's highest court, the Court of Appeals.



It is disappointing that they split on the merits instead of overturning on the merits. Setting aside the penalty on 8th amendment grounds is nice, but the finding of fraud when no bank suffered or claimed any damages, and said they would continue to do business with Trump, is absurd.

My understanding is the split still allows for Trump to appeal those areas for a more complete exoneration / dismissal.

The added benefit of it not being completely tossed is it allows Letitia to keep twisting herself all up. She is already yelling about how she is not giving up this fight.

Good, you go get him Tish!
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

My understanding is the split still allows for Trump to appeal those areas for a more complete exoneration / dismissal.

The added benefit of it not being completely tossed is it allows Letitia to keep twisting herself all up. She is already yelling about how she is not giving up this fight.

Tish would be better advised to turn her attention to her own legal troubles.
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
He was just concerned. Moderately of course. That's why he kept looking for jpgs.

I'm Gipper
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

- Abraham Lincoln
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.