When does Trump have to pay $355 MM?

119,637 Views | 1207 Replies | Last: 16 days ago by FrioAg 00
techno-ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
fc2112 said:

Im Gipper said:

fc2112 said:



SORRY YOUR COUNTDOWN LOST!!!

That does not indicate I was happy about this. Try again.

You mad bro?
The left cannot kill the Spirit of Charlie Kirk.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

- Abraham Lincoln
fc2112
How long do you want to ignore this user?
No. What did i say indicating that?

Just pointing out they read their biases into someone else's posts.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

Quote:

My understanding is the split still allows for Trump to appeal those areas for a more complete exoneration / dismissal.

The added benefit of it not being completely tossed is it allows Letitia to keep twisting herself all up. She is already yelling about how she is not giving up this fight.

Tish would be better advised to turn her attention to her own legal troubles.

Tish says hush white woman.

But seriously, that would be her best option but she aint going to let this go.

Clay Travis was just opining that the felony convictions are almost certainly getting tossed at some point but if I recall that case is sort of in judicial purgatory until end of Trump's term. Not sure though.
VegasAg86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
fc2112 said:

No. What did i say indicating that?

Just pointing out they read their biases into someone else's posts.

What bias causes that? Our experience that when someone does a countdown, they're excited about an event?

I don't think I've ever seen someone do a countdown, then claim, "nah, I don't really care." I'd bet the same for most posters here.
LMCane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Next up task has to be

Tish James being indicted for one of her various criminal acts.
LMCane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiehawg said:

Quote:

It is disappointing that they split on the merits instead of overturning on the merits. Setting aside the penalty on 8th amendment grounds is nice, but the finding of fraud when no bank suffered or claimed any damages, and said they would continue to do business with Trump, is absurd.

This case was a massive distortion of a state statute. I suspect the Court of Appeals will address that misuse.

second case of the day where an Appellate Court overturned leftist trial court Judges

other one was the black female Judge in San Francisco who stopped deportation of Haitians. Overruled by Appellate Court in the last few hours.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

Clay Travis was just opining that the felony convictions are almost certainly getting tossed at some point but if I recall that case is sort of in judicial purgatory until end of Trump's term. Not sure though.

Kind of related that Merchan, like Engeron, deliberately trying to thwart any appeal. That becomes a second denial of rights and since Merchan's is a criminal "conviction" thus raises denial of due process constitutional issues.

MaroonStain
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Trump doesn't have to pay. Judgement was thrown out by appeals court. If not same case, please let me know and I will edit.

Google news link
ThunderCougarFalconBird
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Here's the money shot from one of the dissenting opinions (who agreed that the disgorgement was inappropriate because the fine was excessive but would also dismiss the whole farce):

Quote:

Finally, even if the trial court's findings of liability are defensible, the grotesquely excessive disgorgement award that the trial court imposed, amounting to nearly a half billion dollars, is not. Indeed, even Justice Moulton, who writes to affirm the liability findings, finds it necessary to vacate the disgorgement award in its entirety. As I have already discussed, the disgorgement award is completely disconnected from any harm conceivably caused by the conduct at issue, violates the constitutional prohibition of excessive fines, and seems to have been intended to destroy President Trump's business organization. In essence, the award amounted to something close to a commercial death penalty. There can be little doubt that something other than a passion for justice and fair play lies behind the imposition of such punishment, on the part of both those who sought it and the court that imposed it. Everyone who lives or does business in New York has a right to expect better from the Attorney General and a court of the state that considers itself the business capital of the world.
PCC_80
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I am hoping that NY were overly optimistic and counted Trumps money as already in the bank and were spending like it was.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

- Abraham Lincoln
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MaroonStain said:

Trump doesn't have to pay. Judgement was thrown out by appeals court. If not same case, please let me know and I will edit.

Google news link

Thank you for the update!!

I'm Gipper
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
To the supreme Court!

will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
And she is a hero to 75 million Biden - Kamala voters.

When she passes let me know. I'll put her on the list of graves to piss on.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FrioAg 00
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
She's 82 and hasn't received a dime to date

There are several factors at play with this old hag
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.