YES, Kamala WAS the Border Czar

13,738 Views | 118 Replies | Last: 1 yr ago by SpreadsheetAg
WolfCall
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This and many other correspondence, speeches, videos and audios all add up to the fact that she was Border Czar de facto and de jure.

https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Letter-to-DHS.pdf
Quote:

.....
One Hundred Seventeenth Congress
Congress of the United States
House of Representatives
.....
.....
April 20, 2021

The Honorable Alejandro Mayorkas
Secretary
U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Washington, D.C. 20528

Dear Secretary Mayorkas:
Even if border czar, Vice President Kamala Harris, will not admit itthere is a
humanitarian, public health, and national security crisis at the southern border. In fact, the Biden
Administration is failing to protect Americans by allowing those crossing the southern border to
violate current public health guidance.......
Raiderjay
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AJCB
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So the Democrats are claiming that she was put in charge of making other countries better so immigrants would not come to the country that Democrats are hell bent on making worse.

And 81 million people voted for this…
TequilaMockingbird
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The DNC gave MSM their talking points

TexAggie5432
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TequilaMockingbird
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Does it even matter whether she was "officially" the border czar or not? The border fiasco was a major failed policy of the administration that she was a part of as the #2 person. There's blood on her hands.
Dirty_Mike&the_boys
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Over the past several days, we've seen with increasing frequency and volume issues raised around the use of "czars" by this Administration. Although some people have asked serious questions around the makeup of the White House staff, the bulk of the noise you hear began first with partisan commentators, suggesting that this is somehow a new and sinister development that threatens our democracy. This is, of course, ridiculous. This entire parsing of words over the term Czar is comical. It literally dates back to Bush 43 where after he one the election and all the Florida recounts nonsense, every single duly appointed and senate confirmed members of the GWB administration were labeled "Czars" by the left wing media that refused to concede the 2000 election even after Gore did the "second" time. Then when Barry won the right did the same thing to his appointees.

Fast forward to Trump 2016 the left took it full tilt boogie and instead of labeling his appointees Czars the went after Trump calling him Putin's puppet and with Hillary's fake dossier they were all in. So this is the bizarre political world we live in.

Regardless Biden went on Prime Time TV wearing his face diaper and put Kamala in charge of the border and all that entails including root causes which is a stupid term to use anyway, and then proceeded to do away with every Executive Order of Trump's and the floodgates opened and there is no getting around that fact. And that mop headed lesbian can stand up and lie about the numbers being reduced by 50% all she wants. But 50% from the all time historical high is still three times more than Trump's highest numbers. The numbers don't lie and Kamala has to own that, I don't care what label she's called Czar, or whatever. They let in more illegals than the population of all but four states.
"We're going to turn this red Prius into a soup kitchen!"
Dirty_Mike&the_boys
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Here's something else that she can't hide from. Like me, you might remember the Johnson Administration, the Nixon Administration, the Ford Administration, the Carter Administration, the Reagan Administration, both Bush Administrations, the Clinton Administration, the Obama Administration, and the Trump Administration.

Did you know there was never a Biden Administration?

It has always been the Biden-Harris Administration. It's still on the White House webpage. She shares the blame for the bad economy, inflation, crime, and the border regardless of her tasks or labels or whatever



"We're going to turn this red Prius into a soup kitchen!"
4stringAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
C@LAg said:

Logos Stick said:

talking points delivered:


this is why they win.,

we suck at coordinating our messaging.
IF Republicans tried to do that, the very first story in the media would be exposing them trying to manipulate the public by having the media air their talking points.. The media helps Dems by parroting their message and not telling everyone it came straight from the DNC to make it seem like the truth.
TequilaMockingbird
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MarkTwain said:

Here's something else that she can't hide from. Like me, you might remember the Johnson Administration, the Nixon Administration, the Ford Administration, the Carter Administration, the Reagan Administration, both Bush Administrations, the Clinton Administration, the Obama Administration, and the Trump Administration.

Did you know there was never a Biden Administration?

It has always been the Biden-Harris Administration. It's still on the White House webpage. She shares the blame for the bad economy, inflation, crime, and the border regardless of her tasks or labels or whatever




That's the point I was making a few posts up. The MSM can't erase that fact.
captkirk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BetsyParker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BetsyParker said:

In my social media, I'm seeing comments such as:

Someone indicates Harris has failed as Border Czar, and the Harris apologist says,

"the term 'Border Czar' was invented by MAGA. No such position exists. As to border crossings, more bad news for MAGA. The problem? Tough Biden/Harris policies have caused border crossings to plummet.
Daily averages for today vs. comparable time pre-pandemic:
July 2019 under Trump/Pence: 2,300
July 2024 under Biden/Harris: 1,650"

and then the same Harris apologist says,

"He [Biden] put her [Harris] in charge of working with countries that people seeking asylum to America were coming from. Trying to figure out how we could help stop the caravans leaving, versus how to stop them from arriving. Nuanced but important."

So, yes according to at least one Harris supporter, it seems those of us who thought Harris was tasked with stopping the inflow of people at the border have misunderstood where, in this process, Harris was meant to focus. She was apparently in charge of improving conditions in multiple countries so people would not be compelled to leave them, AND, she is doing a good job because border crossing are plummeting.

I have no words.


I went ahead and engaged by replying to the above with "and the gaslighting begins..." The Harris apologist liked it, so... I wonder what she thinks I'm talking about?
SpreadsheetAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.