Tina Peters convicted in election interference case

13,400 Views | 103 Replies | Last: 21 days ago by aggiehawg
jrdaustin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

TexAgs91 said:

It's not justice if it only applies to republicans.
She showed that Dominion was committing a crime by deleting election data that under federal law must be retained for two years after an election. THAT crime has never been prosecuted.
Or apparently even investigated.

Question: Is there any sort of whistleblower defense for her upon appeal?

It looks to me that she committed a small crime with the intent to expose a much larger crime. The law is being used to silence a person who was attempting to comply with the intent of the voting laws... ie. ensuring that elections are free and fair.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
jrdaustin said:

aggiehawg said:

TexAgs91 said:

It's not justice if it only applies to republicans.
She showed that Dominion was committing a crime by deleting election data that under federal law must be retained for two years after an election. THAT crime has never been prosecuted.
Or apparently even investigated.

Question: Is there any sort of whistleblower defense for her upon appeal?

It looks to me that she committed a small crime with the intent to expose a much larger crime. The law is being used to silence a person who was attempting to comply with the intent of the voting laws... ie. ensuring that elections are free and fair.
Doubtful in a very blue Colorado where the Dominion HQ is located in a rent-a-suite in Denver.
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
If Venezuela is democrats' goal, they sure are doing a bang-up job lately.
Muy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Opalka said:

Here's another republican who tried to interfere in the last election. Republicans keep trying to say democrats cheated, but time and time again, it's always a republican that is found guilty of it.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/former-colorado-clerk-tina-peters-023311840.html




Right, if not for the super honest and America-loving Dems, this country would no longer exist.
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?

I'm Gipper
Ag-Yoakum95
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Gigem314 said:

Quote:

She gained access to election results... post-election. She didn't interfere in the election. Democrat powers were keeping 3rd party auditing of results. She broke the law in how she provided access to information about the election.
I mean, the OP is dumb enough to think Democrats never cheat and only Republicans do...so it's not a stretch to believe OP missed the details on this either.



Plenty of democrats are that stupid.
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Harsh measures?

Start arresting all the pot heads?

Dump the DC homeless in Denver?



I'm Gipper
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Tina Peters' attorney with an update.
lb3
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Eso si, Que es said:

Good, everyone who cheats the ballot box should be prosecuted.

This person cheated the ballot box right?
If by cheated the ballot box you mean she helped preserve evidence used in an audit, you would be correct.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

Question: Is there any sort of whistleblower defense for her upon appeal?

It looks to me that she committed a small crime with the intent to expose a much larger crime. The law is being used to silence a person who was attempting to comply with the intent of the voting laws... ie. ensuring that elections are free and fair.

At her trial, the judge did not even allow her attorneys to present a defense that she was following federal law regarding the retention of election records. He said it was irrelevant since she was being charged under state law.

But of course federal law is superior to state law under the Supremacy Clause.

IOW, she was railroaded.
BadMoonRisin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
https://justthenews.com/nation/states/colorado-gov-jared-polis-suggests-possible-clemency-ex-mesa-county-clerk-tina-peters

Dem state senator got popped for the same charge and was given probation.

Trump might be helping apply pressure on him (or at least giving him a political path) to grant clemency.

FREE TINA PETERS!
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?

I'm Gipper
BadMoonRisin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Was just about to come over here and post this
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
About time!
JamesE4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Im Gipper said:



Great news - it's about time!
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'm happy that Polis was able to put partisanship aside and look at the rule of law and realize it had been applied unevenly...and then, fix that problem.
You can turn off signatures, btw
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ag with kids said:

I'm happy that Polis was able to put partisanship aside and look at the rule of law and realize it had been applied unevenly...and then, fix that problem.

You are being overly generous to Polis.
DeschutesAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The 9 year sentence was too much; otoh 2 years is too lenient for the crimes she committed. Regardless, let's hope she and all the other Americans who are like her seek and receive treatment for their mental delusions.

ETA: kudos to Polis.
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

Ag with kids said:

I'm happy that Polis was able to put partisanship aside and look at the rule of law and realize it had been applied unevenly...and then, fix that problem.

You are being overly generous to Polis.

Perhaps...

But upon reading some stuff about this, he actually stated that it was unfair that a recent Dem got probation for the same crime...

I'm not giving Polis total praise...just saying his move here was good.
You can turn off signatures, btw
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
DeschutesAg said:

The 9 year sentence was too much; otoh 2 years is too lenient for the crimes she committed. Regardless, let's hope she and all the other Americans who are like her seek and receive treatment for their mental delusions.

ETA: kudos to Polis.

Well, that "lenient" 2 years was 2 years longer than the Dem politician just received...for the same crime.
You can turn off signatures, btw
BadMoonRisin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ag with kids said:

DeschutesAg said:

The 9 year sentence was too much; otoh 2 years is too lenient for the crimes she committed. Regardless, let's hope she and all the other Americans who are like her seek and receive treatment for their mental delusions.

ETA: kudos to Polis.

Well, that "lenient" 2 years was 2 years longer than the Dem politician just received...for the same crime.

No ***** The only reason Polis did this was because there's a two-tiered justice system and he knew he couldn't ignore Tina while a Dem operative got probation for the same thing.

especially after he said this about her sentence:
Quote:

"She made a horrible mistake, and she was wrong," Polis posted on X. "I was glad to hear she isn't going to prison which is a hard place for anyone, no less a retired 68-year old pharmacist.


Poster you replied to is clueless about almost everything, it seems. I hope she takes her own advice and seeks treatment for her own delusions and mental illnesses. Tina, btw, was 68 years old when she was sentenced to 9 years.
Jarrin Jay
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Always? 1 in 20+ is not always.

It been we'll documented numerous times the amount of election fraud Dems engaged in, you just don't like it so ignore the truth.
ETFan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jarrin Jay said:

Always? 1 in 20+ is not always.

It been we'll documented numerous times the amount of election fraud Dems engaged in, you just don't like it so ignore the truth.


The false information flag should simply be removed. This **** is out of control.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
DeschutesAg said:

The 9 year sentence was too much; otoh 2 years is too lenient for the crimes she committed. Regardless, let's hope she and all the other Americans who are like her seek and receive treatment for their mental delusions.

ETA: kudos to Polis.

Here's the problem with that. What Peters did was to follow the law in preserving election records. She was told that Dominion was to access the records in her care for some needed upgrades ironically called "Trusted Build." She preserved the existing records before that was done.

And what she did exposed the commission of numerous other federal crimes of destruction of those records by Dominion employees. The "Trusted Build" deleted the 2020 election results in violation of state and federal law.

So Peters needed to be made an example to warn other localized election officials to not come forward when they noted suspicious activity and the Dem state officials were more than happy to throw the book at her for that reason.
DeschutesAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiehawg said:

DeschutesAg said:

The 9 year sentence was too much; otoh 2 years is too lenient for the crimes she committed. Regardless, let's hope she and all the other Americans who are like her seek and receive treatment for their mental delusions.

ETA: kudos to Polis.

Here's the problem with that. What Peters did was to follow the law in preserving election records. She was told that Dominion was to access the records in her care for some needed upgrades ironically called "Trusted Build." She preserved the existing records before that was done.

And what she did exposed the commission of numerous other federal crimes of destruction of those records by Dominion employees. The "Trusted Build" deleted the 2020 election results in violation of state and federal law.

So Peters needed to be made an example to warn other localized election officials to not come forward when they noted suspicious activity and the Dem state officials were more than happy to throw the book at her for that reason.
None of that is true regarding Tina Peters' crimes, but it is a narrative many Trump supporters believe. Just like thousands of other Trump supporters, Tina Peters stupidly committed crimes because she believed a bunch of dumb partisan lies. It is sad.

Believing dumb lies is one thing. Choosing to commit numerous felonies because one believes those lies is a far worse thing. Btw, iirc, Tina Peters was prosecuted by a Republican d.a.. And many Republican election officials in Colorado and around the USA spoke out publicly that her actions were serious violations that deserved to be prosecuted.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
DeschutesAg said:

aggiehawg said:

DeschutesAg said:

The 9 year sentence was too much; otoh 2 years is too lenient for the crimes she committed. Regardless, let's hope she and all the other Americans who are like her seek and receive treatment for their mental delusions.

ETA: kudos to Polis.

Here's the problem with that. What Peters did was to follow the law in preserving election records. She was told that Dominion was to access the records in her care for some needed upgrades ironically called "Trusted Build." She preserved the existing records before that was done.

And what she did exposed the commission of numerous other federal crimes of destruction of those records by Dominion employees. The "Trusted Build" deleted the 2020 election results in violation of state and federal law.

So Peters needed to be made an example to warn other localized election officials to not come forward when they noted suspicious activity and the Dem state officials were more than happy to throw the book at her for that reason.

None of that is true regarding Tina Peters' crimes, but it is a narrative many Trump supporters believe. Just like thousands of other Trump supporters, Tina Peters stupidly committed crimes because she believed a bunch of dumb partisan lies. It is sad.

Believing dumb lies is one thing. Choosing to commit numerous felonies because one believes those lies is a far worse thing. Btw, iirc, Tina Peters was prosecuted by a Republican d.a.. And many Republican election officials in Colorado and around the USA spoke out publicly that her actions were serious violations that deserved to be prosecuted.

The hell it isn't true. Just because you were not interested in doing the research into what happened in 2020, doesn't mean every one else was that uncurious and lazy. And I don't care if election officials are Republican or Democrat.

Pattern recognition is something not all people possess. They cannot connect dots from different sources to see the patterns. And those irregular patterns were detected by math, statistics, physicists, etc. from the Edison Research feed on election night. The lack of an accretive count, for instance, across multiple states and localities occurring at the same time, for instance. That is not human error, it cannot be.

But in the end, people such as yourself obtained what you wanted, a Biden Presidency. So, congrats? I guess?
Philip J Fry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
https://www.dailymail.com/news/article-15822595/Jared-Polis-Tina-Peters-Donald-Trump.html

Polis didn't do it out of the goodness of his heart. He did it because Trump made it hard for him not to
BMX Bandit
How long do you want to ignore this user?
His did Trump make it hard for him not to?

BadMoonRisin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
You'd have to ask the governor who commuted her sentence. He is the one who claimed that.

I know, reading is hard.

BMX Bandit
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Apparently reading is hard because polis didn't say Trump made it hard not to. He said he Trump made it harder to do so

Polis is a trash leftist. He would never credit Trump for anything

Edit: I see you removed the quote.

Quote:


When challenged by CNN on Friday night about whether Trump's constant advocacy in Peters' favor affected his decision, he attacked the president.

His statements' certainly made it a lot harder. President Trump tends to muck up everything he gets involved with, he does not understand this case,' Polis said.

The governor's comments come as his fellow Democrats have slammed him over the decision.

Philip J Fry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Maybe my reading comprehension is not up to snuff. I read the article initially as Polis blaming Trump for the pressure he was getting to commute her. I guess he's saying he would have done it sooner if Trump wasn't involved? I can't tell what he was ranting at.
BadMoonRisin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Peace. His hand was forced or else he would have been called out for being a hypocrit.

And instead of acknowledging that he, you guessed it, blamed Trump - the classic Democrat playbook. It's their only play at this point.
BMX Bandit
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

I guess he's saying he would have done it sooner if Trump wasn't involved? I can't tell what he was ranting at.


Exactly what he's saying. (Lying about)

Trying to blame Trump for this taking so long. No one forced his hand and certainly isn't doling it out if goodness of his heart. Polis has a political or personal reason for this move. Time will tell what it is.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


From the horse's (fill in the blank)
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.