Tina Peters convicted in election interference case

13,395 Views | 103 Replies | Last: 21 days ago by aggiehawg
fasthorse05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

Or any criminal in a Democratic run city.
That comment is redundant. Dems, by their voting nature, are criminals, They may not think so, but by their refusal to read history or learn the laws of economics, they blindly hate their fellow citizens by following the Mao, Stalin, and Hitler, speeches and articles of the leaders they love, they're criminals.

Since hatred is a crime these days, then the comment above applies. Dems don't vote for Democrats, they vote against Republicans. Pure hatred!

And yes OP, I very much support anyone convicted of breaking the law, ASSUMING it's legitimate indictments of the laws of America. For 248 years there have been false indictments or imprisonments, so that has to be taken into account. I just wish you started your post for enlightenment. You did it to satiate the hatred you have for those who don't believe exactly the way you do.

Hate is how progressives sustain themselves. Without hate, introspection begins to slip into the progressive's consciousness, threatening the progressive with the truth: that their ideas and opinions are illogical, hypocritical, dangerous, and asinine.
This is backed by data.
TexAgs91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Opalka said:

Here's another republican who tried to interfere in the last election. Republicans keep trying to say democrats cheated, but time and time again, it's always a republican that is found guilty of it.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/former-colorado-clerk-tina-peters-023311840.html



Go ahead and prosecute them. But only if democommies are also prosecuted. None of this two-tier justice banana republic crap. Are you blind to democommie cheating?
No, I don't care what CNN or Miss NOW said this time
Ad Lunam
Bryanisbest
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
A Republican is prosecuted for election fraud and democrats never are. Makes sense to me. No big surprise here.
doubledog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Opalka said:

Here's another republican who tried to interfere in the last election. Republicans keep trying to say democrats cheated, but time and time again, it's always a republican that is found guilty of it.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/former-colorado-clerk-tina-peters-023311840.html




You were saying.. I cannot hear you over your whining about Republicans.
TxSquarebody
How long do you want to ignore this user?
He's gonna say something along the lines of "no crime if not convicted" all the while believing it's the charges that matter when the other way around. But at least he started a conversation. Liberals are the worst. So "open minded" their brains fell out.
captkirk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
doubledog said:

Opalka said:

Here's another republican who tried to interfere in the last election. Republicans keep trying to say democrats cheated, but time and time again, it's always a republican that is found guilty of it.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/former-colorado-clerk-tina-peters-023311840.html




You were saying.. I cannot hear you over your whining about Republicans.
This dip**** gave you another term of Lina Hidalgo
Who?mikejones!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Always Republicans, eh? 2 min Google search says otherwise

https://www.cnn.com/2022/09/27/politics/michael-ozzie-myers-election-fraud-prison-sentenced/index.html

Democrat Myers sent to jail for 30 months for ballotnstuff in Pennsylvania

https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2022/02/04/tennessee-pamela-moses-voting-fraud-prison/

Moss got 6 months for registering felons

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/arizona-woman-admits-guilt-in-ballot-collection-scheme/

Fuentes guilty of ballot harvesting

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/democrat-charged-voter-fraud-scheme-dozens-absentee-ballots

Dem in queens indicted for absentee voter fraud

https://apnews.com/article/bridgeport-connecticut-absentee-ballots-df90926a1ae4c1e89fd41913a85d45c8

Dems in Connecticut guilty of absentee ballot fraud

https://nypost.com/2020/05/21/ex-philly-election-official-pleads-guilty-to-voter-fraud/

Demure convicted of stuffing ballots in philly

aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
There is an often overlooked portion of the day that Dominion showed up to the "Trusted Build" update.

Dominion guy arrived early and already had access to the precinct location. She was surprised because she showed shortly after 8AM when the appointment was for 8:30AM.

Then the Dominion tech doing the update (to erase/delete most records from 2020 election) told her there was a backdoor in which the Sec of State's office could breach her election machines and even her main server.

Why is that?
RafterAg223
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Opalka said:

Here's another republican who tried to interfere in the last election. Republicans keep trying to say democrats cheated, but time and time again, it's always a republican that is found guilty of it.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/former-colorado-clerk-tina-peters-023311840.html


Yet another troll job from you that proves nothing. Go back to making excuses for violent criminals that hurt conservatives.
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So many good replies to this discussion topic from the OP.
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It would be nice if her witnesses and evidence could be heard and seen by someone before she goes to prison

agaberto
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Another conservative railroaded by a leftist judge in a leftist state.
AggieMD95
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Isn't she just a whistle blower ?
Seems like a malicious prosecution
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I watched that hearing this morning. What a pile of crap they were throwing at her. Having said that, she did make some bad mistakes in how she handled the court orders.

Whether she was correct that Dominion's Trusted Build actually destroyed federally protected 2020 election results was completely besides the point for this judge. He didn't care.
General Jack D. Ripper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
1. Hang her in the town square. Elections should be sacred.

2. Hey OP, this isn't the win you think it is.

3. These kinds of posts reek of the subreddits that point out child molesters that aren't drag queens.

American Hardwood
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Opalka said:

Here's another republican who tried to interfere in the last election. Republicans keep trying to say democrats cheated, but time and time again, it's always a republican that is found guilty of it.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/former-colorado-clerk-tina-peters-023311840.html


Election interference isn't at all what happened here, but you go right on with that deceitful narrative. That democrat water ain't gonna carry itself!
The best way to keep evil men from wielding great power is to not create great power in the first place.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BluHorseShu
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Opalka said:

Here's another republican who tried to interfere in the last election. Republicans keep trying to say democrats cheated, but time and time again, it's always a republican that is found guilty of it.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/former-colorado-clerk-tina-peters-023311840.html


I wish you good luck with this post. Everyone know that only Democrats cheat in elections. Its science.
Funky Winkerbean
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BluHorseShu said:

Opalka said:

Here's another republican who tried to interfere in the last election. Republicans keep trying to say democrats cheated, but time and time again, it's always a republican that is found guilty of it.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/former-colorado-clerk-tina-peters-023311840.html


I wish you good luck with this post. Everyone know that only Democrats cheat in elections. Its science.


Absolutely no one has said that.
jt2hunt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Crazy to think that Tina was right.
jt2hunt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Opalka said:

Here's another republican who tried to interfere in the last election. Republicans keep trying to say democrats cheated, but time and time again, it's always a republican that is found guilty of it.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/former-colorado-clerk-tina-peters-023311840.html


and Tina was right! ^^^^^^
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
jt2hunt said:

Crazy to think that Tina was right.
This judge this morning was really hung up on Mike Lindell reaching out to her for one of his election symposiums he had in South Dakota and that Lindell sent a private jet to get her and the images of the drive. And then Lindell flew her to Texas before flying her back to Colorado. That she was "galavanting" all across the country on...gasp...Mike Lindell's dime. That was an abuse of her position to that judge.
sleepybeagle
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
jteAg said:

DallasAg 94 said:

Democrats don't prosecute themselves, they only go after Republicans.

So... yes, it is the Republicans that get held accountable. Democrats are not held accountable. And you celebrate that?!
And the sad part is… you actually believe this!
Bless your heart!
The really sad part is how dishonest, or perhaps naive you are.

Votes are worth a lot of money. Look how much candidates spend to get it. Fact
Money is always protected by locks and identification - or it is stolen. Fact
Votes not protected by secure voting with identification will be stolen too. Fact

So... remind me again - which party is it again who fights to the death to defend voting without an ID or proof of U.S. citizenship? Which party is it again who wants mail in ballets and drop boxes?
sleepybeagle
DanielDay
How long do you want to ignore this user?
She continually violated the law as a public official and lied to the police during their investigation. She doesn't just maintain innocence she says her alleged actions weren't against the law. Hint, her actions were 100% against the law during the post election period and many of her actions since then.

9 years is steep. Perhaps a Trump Republican will be elected governor in Colorado to pardon her or an appeals court let her out. So far she's lost every appeal attempt including Gorsuch in the Supreme Court.

Another rube going to prison for Trump.
BlueTaze
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Can OP tell me how many of these election fraud cases are Dems and how many are GOP?

https://www.heritage.org/voterfraud/search?state=NJ
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Since we now know how to easily remotely access Dominion's (and likely most other voting machine companies) servers and change votes, Trump turns CO, NJ, NY red in a few weeks and the same people claiming there is no evidence of fraud will be screaming like scalded cats.
jt2hunt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
What appeals? Did she not just get convicted?
richardag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiedent said:

I would expect that if I stole a county officials security/ID badge and allowed an individual without clearance to access the hard drive of the county voting machines, I'd be in jail too. Republican or Democrat.
Agreed,
quote from the article
  • In the trial's closing arguments, prosecutor Janet Drake argued Peters allowed a man posing as a county employee to take copies of the election system's hard drive before and after a software upgrade in May 2021
She was copying hard drive data to find any discrepancies between the data before and after a software upgrade.
Admirable goal, criminal attempt.
Just curious what the data revealed?
Look at the orators in our republics; as long as they are poor, both state and people can only praise their uprightness; but once they are fattened on the public funds, they conceive a hatred for justice, plan intrigues against the people and attack the democracy.
-Aristophanes
richardag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiehawg said:

I watched that hearing this morning. What a pile of crap they were throwing at her. Having said that, she did make some bad mistakes in how she handled the court orders.

Whether she was correct that Dominion's Trusted Build actually destroyed federally protected 2020 election results was completely besides the point for this judge. He didn't care.
Your quote,"Whether she was correct that Dominion's Trusted Build actually destroyed federally protected 2020 election results was completely besides the point for this judge. He didn't care"

A couple questions;
  • Are these judges elected to their positions?
  • Do you know if there is any investigation into the destruction of the 2020 election results?
Look at the orators in our republics; as long as they are poor, both state and people can only praise their uprightness; but once they are fattened on the public funds, they conceive a hatred for justice, plan intrigues against the people and attack the democracy.
-Aristophanes
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
We knew the logs were deleted by the Trusted Build software update when Peters took the copies of the before and after hard drives to South Dakota. Computer security experts there showed which SLOG and other file directories were deleted by the 'update'.
Nuke_Ag05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Whoa....
TexAgs91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It's not justice if it only applies to republicans.
annie88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Liberal voter fraud 1,574,000

Republican voter fraud 2

But hey, whatever floats your boat to justify it, dude
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TexAgs91 said:

It's not justice if it only applies to republicans.
She showed that Dominion was committing a crime by deleting election data that under federal law must be retained for two years after an election. THAT crime has never been prosecuted.
Page 2 of 3
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.