J6ers Pardoned

41,328 Views | 434 Replies | Last: 11 days ago by We fixed the keg
aginlakeway
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
RangerRick9211 said:

Bruh, voted Trump.

But ok.

OK. But you said you were a never Trumper here ...

https://texags.com/forums/16/topics/3523657/replies/69535333
One day at a time.
TRADUCTOR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aginlakeway said:

RangerRick9211 said:

Bruh, voted Trump.

But ok.

OK. But you said you were a never Trumper here ...

https://texags.com/forums/16/topics/3523657/replies/69535333


Political prisoners released. Productive patriotic citizens, jailed, isolation, bankrupted for four years.

Oh how horrifying they released, but I voted for Trump bruh. Seems to be a theme for some posters about all this winning.
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
will25u said:




DC JUDGES ACTING REALLY BADLY:

Hoy sh*t. This gem from former chief judge Beryl Howell, an unabashed Trump hater, who denied part of new DC US atty motion to dismiss J6 indictment following Pres Trump's pardon. She calls the president's pardon proclamation "flatly wrong."

When you see someone claiming these proceedings were fair and impartial, present this tirade to them.

Long past time to impeach this desperate, bitter hag.

"The only reason provided for this instruction, as set out in the [President's] Proclamation's introduction, is the assertion that this action 'ends a grave national injustice that has been perpetrated upon the American people over the last four years and begins a process of national reconciliation.

No 'national injustice' occurred here, just as no outcome-determinative election fraud occurred in the 2020 presidential election. No "process of national reconciliation" can begin when poor losers, whose preferred candidate loses an election, are glorified for disrupting a constitutionally mandated proceeding in Congress and doing so with impunity. That merely raises the dangerous specter of future lawless conduct by other poor losers and undermines the rule of law.

Yet, this presidential pronouncement of a 'national injustice' is the sole justification provided in the government's motion to dismiss the pending indictment.

Having presided over scores of criminal cases charging defendants for their criminal conduct both outside and inside the U.S. Capitol Building on January 6, 2021, which charges were fully supported by evidence in the form of extensive videotapes and photographs, admissions by defendants in the course of plea hearings and in testimony at trials, and the testimony of law enforcement officers and congressional staff present at the Capitol on that day, this Court cannot let stand the revisionist myth relayed in this presidential pronouncement.

The prosecutions in this case and others charging defendants for their criminal conduct at the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021, present no injustice, but instead reflect the diligent work of conscientious public servants, including prosecutors and law enforcement officials, and dedicated defense attorneys, to defend our democracy and rights and preserve our long tradition of peaceful transfers of powerwhich, until January 6, 2021, served as a model to the worldall while affording those charged every protection guaranteed by our Constitution and the criminal justice system.

As to these two defendants specifically, both admitted their criminal conduct under oath, after consultation with their attorneys, and pursuant to plea agreements to which they agreed. Bluntly put, the assertion offered in the presidential pronouncement for the pending motion to dismiss is flatly wrong."

She dismissed without prejudice instead of with prejudice as DOJ asked.
Is this legal? She was instructed, per the pardon, to dismiss WITH prejudice.

Since she didn't, could they appeal to the SCOTUS to drop the hammer?
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Tom Kazansky 2012
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
will25u said:




Heads need to roll. I mean wtf
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RangerRick9211
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aginlakeway said:

RangerRick9211 said:

Bruh, voted Trump.

But ok.

OK. But you said you were a never Trumper here ...

https://texags.com/forums/16/topics/3523657/replies/69535333


Shoot your shot to sway the masses.

Then default to the lowest common denominator. That's our republic. I don't like the outcome, but it's much better than Harris in an either/or.
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
"I'm going to vote for Trump, but then I'm going to be upset and post online about it if he pardons those evil dangerous seditious insurrectionists who almost took over the government and stole our democracy with their selfies and their pepper spray."
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Tom Kazansky 2012
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
will25u said:




Uh oh
aginlakeway
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
One day at a time.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Dude served six months in federal prison for walking into a building, only to be killed resisting arrest months later.




Police say the deputy attempted to arrest Huttle after stopping him, but the civilian resisted.

The officer responded by firing his weapon and killing Huttle following a supposed fight.

"An altercation took place between the suspect and the officer, which resulted in the officer firing his weapon and fatally wounding the suspect," the Jasper County Sheriff's Office said in a statement.



Federal authorities charged Huttle with multiple misdemeanor offenses for recording his entry into the Capitol's Senate Wing and walking through several locations inside.

The Northwest Indiana Times reported Huttle was sentenced to six months in federal prison before he was released on July 17.

The St. Louis Post Dispatch reported that Huttle was among the J6 protesters pardoned by Trump last week.

Pizza
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If he was suffering emotional or mental problems resulting from solitary confinement, that's even more of a condemnation of the way people who were actually peacefully protesting were treated.
jrdaustin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The guy who got 4 years for putting his feet on Nancy's desk had an interesting take...


TRADUCTOR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If you are Ma 'Kiah Cherae who assaulted and sent 2 federal officers to hospital. You get freedom with parole + time took to pay bail.

J6 patriots were assaulted by officers and none responded with this level of violence. I'm happy J6 political prisoners were released an pray they recover from the torture.

https://www.tsa.gov/about/employee-stories/arizona-woman-sentenced-assaulting-tsa-officer-phoenix-sky-harbor
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TRADUCTOR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Here is the sheriff officer staff page
https://www.jaspercountyin.gov/egov/apps/staff/directory.egov

Murder
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u said:


I hope it hasn't all been destroyed.
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Another seditious insurrectionist gunned down. Coincidence?

captkirk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It's been clear it was a plant from the beginning. As was the whole episode. I hope some former government employees/officials go to prison.

If this were legitimate, the perp would have been immediately publicized. Instead, we got altered camera footage and camera "malfunctions."
84AGEC
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Probably pardoned
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
84AGEC said:

Probably pardoned
Maybe. But naming that person would be huge.

There is no justification for this. I realize it was a government op, but it goes way beyond the scope of what the FBI/law enforcement should ever be involved in. This was used to craft a narrative to the American people that is a lie.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SwigAg11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aginlakeway
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
One day at a time.
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u said:


Ashley is a piece of garbage. She would have been a fine nazi.

"I vas just doink my doooty!" (Clicks heels)

She needs to go to prison for malicious prosecution.

Saying the DC courts all upheld something and the DC circuit court upheld it is merely an indictment of the DC courts. The J6 folks were railroaded by this goosestepper and her co-workers.
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ellis Wyatt said:

will25u said:


Ashley is a piece of garbage. She would have been a fine nazi.

"I vas just doink my doooty!" (Clicks heels)

She needs to go to prison for malicious prosecution.

Saying the DC courts all upheld something and the DC circuit court upheld it is merely an indictment of the DC courts. The J6 folks were railroaded by this goosestepper and her co-workers.
yeah she got meemaws who took selfies in prison "just doing her job" and she's arrogant and proud of it.
TRADUCTOR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oh no said:

Another seditious insurrectionist gunned down. Coincidence?




No, this is a sinister message.
HTownAg98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The ***** crazy.
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
WolfCall
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
J6 Prosecutors: You're Fired!!!
FBI Agents who investigated the J6ers: We're looking at your investigations!

https://nypost.com/2025/01/31/us-news/trump-doj-fires-prosecutors-initiates-review-process-of-fbi-agents-who-worked-on-jan-6-cases-reports/
Quote:

Trump DOJ fires prosecutors, initiates 'review process' of FBI agents who worked on Jan. 6 cases: reports
By Victor Nava Published Jan. 31, 2025, 11:17 p.m. ET

The Justice Department fired dozens of federal prosecutors involved in Jan. 6 cases on Friday and informed the FBI that it would initiate a "review process" to determine if thousands of agents that worked Capitol riot investigations should also be terminated.

The axed prosecutors were informed of their dismissal in a letter from interim DC US Attorney Ed Martin, according to multiple outlets.

Martin told the 30 or so fired federal prosecutors that they were being removed as a direct result of their role in the prosecution of some of the more than 1,500 individuals who stormed the US Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.

The interim DC US attorney's letter also cited President Trump's Day One executive order pardoning Jan. 6 defendants, which referred to the prosecutions as "a grave national injustice that has been perpetrated upon the American people over the last four years."

Martin had asked Jan. 6 prosecutors on Monday to turn over information related to the use of "obstructing an official proceeding of Congress" charges in Capitol riot cases as part of an internal review.

The Supreme Court ruled last June that the charge used on more than 300 riot defendants was too broadly applied.

Martin described the use of the charge in Jan. 6 cases as a "great failure of our office" and indicated that a report on the matter would be completed by Friday, which coincided with the firings.

The Trump administration is expected to carry out more firings related to Jan. 6 probes/

Acting FBI Director Brian Driscoll, Jr., informed employees Friday that the DOJ had asked for a list of people at the bureau who worked on Capitol riot cases as part of "a review process to determine whether any additional personnel actions are necessary," according to multiple outlets.

Driscoll noted that his name and "thousands" of others would be passed along to the DOJ.

"We understand that this request encompasses thousands of employees across the country who have supported these investigative efforts," Driscoll wrote in a memo, according to NBC News.

"I am one of those employees," he added.

The labor union representing more than 14,000 active and former FBI Special Agents expressed outrage over the DOJ investigation, which could lead to firings. ....

......


 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.