One additional note on PCI... do not confuse with PCI Govt Services.

That entity is Poarch Creek Indian Government Services LLC. An Alabama tribe who since 2020 has been awarded nearly $50MM.

Looks like they provide computer related services to DHS, Treasury, Defense, Commerce, etc. I am certain there is NO waste to be seen in that funding.

https://pci-nsn.gov/

https://www.usaspending.gov/recipient/2f89382e-3f9d-2ae9-4e64-cc82d2bb7bba-C/latest

And someone was mentioning the usaspending.gov site was down and blaming Elon and his minions. Seems to be working just fine.

nortex97 said:

---

Amy Jackson of course dictates that Trump can't do something without even considering the merits of an action.

Note: Judge entered an administrative stay as opposed to a TRO, meaning she hasn't even considered merits. https://t.co/xRB1uLmkEZ

— Margot Cleveland (@ProfMJCleveland) February 11, 2025

Trump should have his office moved to the basement.

---

Lock his office and tell him to work from home. This ***** cannot dictate who Trump employs.

ThunderCougarFalconBird said:

---

The problem with what these judges are doing is that they aren't opining on constitutional or legal issues. They're using the judiciary to insert themselves into the role of executive administration whenever Trump does something they disagree with on a policy basis.

The judge that demanded an un-freeze of federal funding, for instance, has functionally taken usaid out of the executive purview and placed it into a judicial receivership. Hardly following any guidelines of separation of powers.

---

Iow an actual constitutional crisis versus the one the left claims when Trump wants to determine who works for him and fire those who don't follow his direction.

Science Denier said:

---

When a judge's "ruling' goes against the constitution and against current law, that judge should be impeached.

---

you betcha!!!!

Quote:

---

GOP Rep Crane drafts impeachment articles on judge who blocked DOGE from accessing Treasury info

Arizona GOP Rep. Eli Crane said Tuesday he's drafting impeachment articles for a judge who blocked the Department of Government Efficiency from accessing Treasury Department information.

"Partisan judges abusing their positions is a threat to democracy," Crane wrote on the social media platform X regarding his plans for Judge Paul Engelmayer, of the U.S. District for the Southern District of New York.

https://justthenews.com/government/congress/arizona-rep-drafts-impeachment-articles-against-judge-who-blocked-doge#article

---

The left is clearly apoplectic and hoping Trump just defies their fake judges.

As Sean states, the left loves to use the phrase 'without evidence.' Until they start fantasizing about Trump.

Quote:

---

He didn't do it 2 years ago when it would've helped their cause just as much as it will next time they have a trifecta.

---

He didn't do it 2 years ago because Sinema and Manchin weren't on board. That's literally the only reason.

Teslag said:

---

Quote:

---

He didn't do it 2 years ago when it would've helped their cause just as much as it will next time they have a trifecta.

---

He didn't do it 2 years ago because Sinema and Manchin weren't on board. That's literally the only reason.

---

Exactly.

We were two senators away from it being torpedoed.

Sean is on point....This is the time to stay on message and hammer the

"You elected me to root out waste and fraud. We are working aggressively to provide transparency to the tax payers as to how their hard earned tax dollars are being spent. This is something every American taxpayer should want. What is the left's response? It is to fight to do anything/everything to stop this. Is it their blind hatred of me? Is it they think you don't have the right to know where your dollars are spent? or even worse, is it they don't want you to see how they are enriching themselves and their friends/family with your money?"

and keep up with the daily/hourly drops of "did you know XX billion of your tax dollars are going to this insane, almost made-up sounding initiative."

Old May Banker said:

---

Codify policy thru congress.

---

Winner...winner.

While pursuing change of laws in Congress this also needs to be pursued in the Courts and I suspect that is in the works. First Appeals and then SCOTUS if need be to see where the Executive Branch can get latitude.

The answer to this judicial overreach to malicious compliance.

With the treasury example, I would lock out anyone not explicitly named by the judge as having authority to access the system.

Then when the judge orders they be granted access, I would enable their accounts but forbid them to do any task for which the judge didn't include explicit work instructions.

If the courts want to run the executive branch, bury them in paper.

Now the Judges are trying to be website editors for the Exec.

BREAKING: A judge orders the CDC, FDA and HHS to restore webpages that were deleted to comply with a Trump executive order. https://t.co/oVC6BSQXFZ

— CBS News (@CBSNews) February 11, 2025

Truly absurd. Judges as website editors!?

We should at least ATTEMPT to fire this junky jurist.

The notion of having a judge job for life, no matter how bad the judgments, is ridiculous!

Enough is enough. https://t.co/lMPq6zWOj5

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) February 11, 2025

It amazes me how the left had no problem when the president used executive power to control the citizens yet are besides themselves when the president tries to control the government, his primary task as the head of the executive branch.

Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:

---

45-70Ag said:

---

Since when do dems care about what judges say, Biden ignored scotus on student loans.

---

No he didn't. He tried to find another loophole to fit what he wanted. I don't like it but that's not what he did.

---

So, he ignored the courts.

American Hardwood said:

---

It amazes me how the left had no problem when the president used executive power to control the citizens yet are besides themselves when the president tries to control the government, his primary task as the head of the executive branch.

---

I agree. Comgress has too much power in the operation of the executive branch.

The absurdity of the court to demand the executive hire, fire or soend money in any particular way is baffling.

Who?mikejones! said:

---

American Hardwood said:

---

It amazes me how the left had no problem when the president used executive power to control the citizens yet are besides themselves when the president tries to control the government, his primary task as the head of the executive branch.

---

I agree. Comgress has too much power in the operation of the executive branch.

The absurdity of the court to demand the executive hire, fire or soend money in any particular way is baffling extremely corrupt.

---

FIFY

Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:

---

Follow the law and don't forget that today shall pass and at some point, the Dems will be back in office. Don't let them follow a precedent.

---

Uh, I think its Trump that is following some of Obama and Biden's precedent. Maybe the demWit's in charge of those admins should have thought:

"Follow the law and don't forget that today shall pass and at some point, the Republicans will be back in office."

Well that day is here. Burns these mofo's down. Payback is a *itch

45-70Ag said:

---

Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:

---

45-70Ag said:

---

Since when do dems care about what judges say, Biden ignored scotus on student loans.

---

No he didn't. He tried to find another loophole to fit what he wanted. I don't like it but that's not what he did.

---

So, he ignored the courts.

---

No, he used a different law. The courts didn't say he couldn't do what he did, they just said that he used the wrong law/power.

Again, I don't like it but it's more nuanced than you want it to be.

ttu_85 said:

---

Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:

---

Follow the law and don't forget that today shall pass and at some point, the Dems will be back in office. Don't let them follow a precedent.

---

Uh, I think its Trump that is following some of Obama and Biden's precedent. Maybe the demWit's in charge of those admins should have thought:

"Follow the law and don't forget that today shall pass and at some point, the Republicans will be back in office."

Well that day is here. Burns these mofo's down. Payback is a *itch

---

That's a child's response that ignores that today won't always be this way and the Dems will be in control in the future. Grow up, Peter Pan.

Oh Ok, Trump is just using a new law or power then, not ignoring the stupid, terrible partisan district judge.

Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:

---

ttu_85 said:

---

Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:

---

Follow the law and don't forget that today shall pass and at some point, the Dems will be back in office. Don't let them follow a precedent.

---

Uh, I think its Trump that is following some of Obama and Biden's precedent. Maybe the demWit's in charge of those admins should have thought:

"Follow the law and don't forget that today shall pass and at some point, the Republicans will be back in office."

Well that day is here. Burns these mofo's down. Payback is a *itch

---

That's a child's response that ignores that today won't always be this way and the Dems will be in control in the future. Grow up, Peter Pan.

---

Wow who pissed in your Wheaties. Oh thats, right all your posting is hypocritical. Then you throw a fit when you get called out.

No, the child like responses where in 2020. When Biden went nuts with EO's that were highly inflationary.--"Cause they weren't Trump". I bet you cheered like a little school girl in those days. Your posting sure reflects that.

Why dont you man up and be honest for once. Everything happening today is occurring due to the Democrat's heavy handed response back then. Everything from canceling Trumps security clearances to and gutting domestic energy.

But as usual you forgot about that. And cant even understand that those actions would have serious consequences in the future. Well the future is now here and the dems are going to pay for launching the "Precedent War"

BQ78 said:

---

Oh Ok, Trump is just using a new law or power then, not ignoring the stupid, terrible partisan district judge.

---

I'm not saying it's right or that I agree with it(I've specifically said I don't) but what I wrote is what happened, essentially. Sorry that bothers you and you think it's a support of Biden's plan.

ttu_85 said:

---

Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:

---

ttu_85 said:

---

Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:

---

Follow the law and don't forget that today shall pass and at some point, the Dems will be back in office. Don't let them follow a precedent.

---

Uh, I think its Trump that is following some of Obama and Biden's precedent. Maybe the demWit's in charge of those admins should have thought:

"Follow the law and don't forget that today shall pass and at some point, the Republicans will be back in office."

Well that day is here. Burns these mofo's down. Payback is a *itch

---

That's a child's response that ignores that today won't always be this way and the Dems will be in control in the future. Grow up, Peter Pan.

---

Wow who pissed in your Wheaties. Oh thats, right all your posting is hypocritical. Then you throw a fit when you get called out.

No, the child like responses where in 2020. When Biden went nuts with EO's that were highly inflationary.--"Cause they weren't Trump". I bet you cheered like a little school girl in those days. Your posting sure reflects that.

Why dont you man up and be honest for once. Everything happening today is occurring due to the Democrat's heavy handed response back then. Everything from canceling Trumps security clearances to and gutting domestic energy.

But as usual you forgot about that. And cant even understand that those actions would have serious consequences in the future. Well the future is now here and the dems are going to pay for launching the "Precedent War"

---

Please explain where I was hypocritical or threw a fit. What do I need to man up about and be honest about, for once?

BQ78 said:

---

Oh Ok, Trump is just using a new law or power then, not ignoring the stupid, terrible partisan district judge.

---

Not yet he hasn't, but he should sure try!

Doesn't bother me in the least. Just happy that Trump isn't letting it slow him down and is channeling his inner Farragut and to quote that Admiral (no he really didn't say it this way):

Quote:

---

Damn the Torpedoes! Full Speed Ahead!

---

IMPEACH as many as you can.

LMCane said:

---

IMPEACH as many as you can.

---

This is the action that should be taken. But the establishment R''s probably won't support it.

Will the Speaker put many of these "on the record"? Will be interesting.

Brilliant, he just did his own judge shopping to overrule the Lib judge. Now he can follow the judge's order to cut spending as he sees fit and expedite the conflict to the Supreme Court, where he will once again win, this is so tiring all this winning.

BQ78 said:

---

Brilliant, he just did his own judge shopping to overrule the Lib judge. Now he can follow the judge's order to cut spending as he sees fit and expedite the conflict to the Supreme Court, where he will once again win, this is so tiring all this winning.

---

who you call "his own judge" is the Lib judge

Doubt this goes anywhere, but like to see it!

I’m drafting articles of impeachment for U.S. District Judge John McConnell Jr.

He’s a partisan activist weaponizing our judicial system to stop President Trump’s funding freeze on woke and wasteful government spending.

We must end this abusive overreach. Stay tuned. https://t.co/ARp7KBjK9u

— Rep. Andrew Clyde (@Rep_Clyde) February 12, 2025

Trump should always follow the law of the land by these "ELECTED AMERICAN" judges

Francis Macomber said:

---

We elected a President, not a king like so many of you seem to want. Presidents have to follow the law and are subject to checks and balances which will block or delay them when they try to go against the Constitution.

Congrats, our system is still working despite so many efforts by Trump and his team to destroy it. You will be thankful for these things the next time a popular Democrat takes the Presidency.

---

Quoting Napolean, not a great look.

You remember what the left did to Scalia? That's how I would handle these judges.