Pam Bondi Press Conference

5,807 Views | 38 Replies | Last: 11 days ago by fullback44
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
4:20p, 2/12/25
I don't have a link, but I did see this this far.

Filing charges against NY Governor and AG for failure to enforce federal immigration laws.

Reply Quote
95
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
4:22p, 2/12/25
Reply Quote
92
Ag87H2O
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
4:22p, 2/12/25
AG


Bondi is going to be a fantastic AG. She definitely comes across as someone who doesn't suffer fools at all.
Reply Quote
115
1 edit
aggiehawg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
4:23p, 2/12/25
AG
Charges, not a civil lawsuit...criminal charges unless she misspoke there.
Reply Quote
92
Tramp96
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
4:26p, 2/12/25
Reply Quote
25
Enviroag02
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
4:27p, 2/12/25
AG
She initially said charges but later said lawsuits. I think she initially misspoke.
Reply Quote
4
TexAgs91
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
4:28p, 2/12/25
AG
Let's GO!
No, I don't care what CNN or MSNBC said this time
Ad Lunam
Reply Quote
6
Ellis Wyatt
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to aggiehawg • 4:28p, 2/12/25
aggiehawg said:
Charges, not a civil lawsuit...criminal charges unless she misspoke there.
Seems like it is obstruction of the law, which most definitely should be criminal.
Reply Quote
48
AtticusMatlock
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
4:34p, 2/12/25
Is there an obligation of state governments to help enforce immigration law? Or is there merely an obligation to get out of the way? The devil will be in the details of this suit. If they are being charged with simply not helping I don't think it can go anywhere. If they're being accused of openly harboring and blocking enforcement, that's a different animal.
Reply Quote
2
Krombopulos Michael
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to aggiehawg • 4:34p, 2/12/25
aggiehawg said:
Charges, not a civil lawsuit...criminal charges unless she misspoke there.
Safe to say that DOJ has some pretty solid evidence?

No way, they'd charge without a bunch of base hits, lots of home runs, and a couple of grand slam walk-offs just in case, right?

This is WAY to political to come out and stub their toes..
Reply Quote
4
1 edit
FTAG 2000
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
4:35p, 2/12/25
AG
Pam's got a lot to deliver on. Illegal immigrants, election fraud, deep state.

Godspeed, Pam.
Reply Quote
57
Tag77
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
4:37p, 2/12/25
Holy Maceral Andy!
Reply Quote
1
Ellis Wyatt
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to AtticusMatlock • 4:39p, 2/12/25
AtticusMatlock said:
Is there an obligation of state governments to help enforce immigration law? Or is there merely an obligation to get out of the way?
They are obstructing by intentionally not cooperating. Stop being obtuse.
Reply Quote
32
aggiehawg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to AtticusMatlock • 4:41p, 2/12/25
AG
AtticusMatlock said:
Is there an obligation of state governments to help enforce immigration law? Or is there merely an obligation to get out of the way? The devil will be in the details of this suit. If they are being charged with simply not helping I don't think it can go anywhere. If they're being accused of openly harboring and blocking enforcement, that's a different animal.
That is my working assumption at this point. Obstruction.
Reply Quote
16
TAM85
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
4:45p, 2/12/25
I would think releasing and alerting re raids would be obstruction.
Reply Quote
22
10andBOUNCE
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
4:49p, 2/12/25
AG
Reply Quote
11
MouthBQ98
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to aggiehawg • 4:49p, 2/12/25
AG
Or using federal funds regarding immigration enforcement improperly, perhaps. Or causing federal dollars to have to be spent in excess of what should have been required due to deliberate activities, maybe? It's hard to say what would rise to legal responsibility at the state level regarding immigration
Reply Quote
1
aggiehawg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to MouthBQ98 • 4:50p, 2/12/25
AG
MouthBQ98 said:
Or using federal funds regarding immigration enforcement improperly, perhaps. Or causing federal dollars to have to be spent in excess of what should have been required due to deliberate activities, maybe? It's hard to say what would rise to legal responsibility at the state level regarding immigration
Misuse of federal funds is a biggie, has teeth.
Reply Quote
25
Krombopulos Michael
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to MouthBQ98 • 4:54p, 2/12/25
Pure speculation here......Maybe they got caught taking a cut of that last FEMA payment?

FEMA payment to hotel owner who pays Hochul/James and crew?
Reply Quote
19
El Gallo Blanco
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to TAM85 • 4:57p, 2/12/25
TAM85 said:
I would think releasing and alerting re raids would be obstruction.
Exactly, can you imagine some conservative politicians tipping criminal syndicates off to upcoming FBI or DEA raids? Imagine how they would be treated.

I'm no lawyer or politician, but how is this not comparable???
Reply Quote
7
Funky Winkerbean
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
4:57p, 2/12/25
AG
Our government is serving us again.
Reply Quote
6
fredfredunderscorefred
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
5:00p, 2/12/25
AG
DOJ filed a complaint suit against Illinois last week - similar to the one Sessions filed against California and the USSC declined to hear. seems more civil in nature. preemption issue. https://assets.law360news.com/2294000/2294079/complaint.pdf
doj-files-lawsuit-against-sanctuary-policies-in-illinois-cook-county-and-the-city-of-chicago

But she says charges here - any indictment? would be surprised she misspoke but inclined to think this will be more civil also. EDIT: but criminal SHOULD probably be filed against some of these dems
Reply Quote
3
2 edits
Rockdoc
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
5:03p, 2/12/25
AG
Let them hire some of those high dollar attorneys. See how they like it!
Reply Quote
3
aggiehawg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to fredfredunderscorefred • 5:10p, 2/12/25
AG
fredfredunderscorefred said:
DOJ filed a complaint suit against Illinois last week - similar to the one Sessions filed against California and the USSC declined to hear. seems more civil in nature. preemption issue. https://assets.law360news.com/2294000/2294079/complaint.pdf
doj-files-lawsuit-against-sanctuary-policies-in-illinois-cook-county-and-the-city-of-chicago

But she says charges here - any indictment? would be surprised she misspoke but inclined to think this will be more civil also. EDIT: but criminal SHOULD probably be filed against some of these dems
AG can file charges without empaneling a grand jury, called filing by information. There is also a civil component to RICO that many people forget about. Not saying RICO implications here but just a thought.
Reply Quote
7
fredfredunderscorefred
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to aggiehawg • 5:13p, 2/12/25
AG
aggiehawg said:
fredfredunderscorefred said:
DOJ filed a complaint suit against Illinois last week - similar to the one Sessions filed against California and the USSC declined to hear. seems more civil in nature. preemption issue. https://assets.law360news.com/2294000/2294079/complaint.pdf
doj-files-lawsuit-against-sanctuary-policies-in-illinois-cook-county-and-the-city-of-chicago

But she says charges here - any indictment? would be surprised she misspoke but inclined to think this will be more civil also. EDIT: but criminal SHOULD probably be filed against some of these dems
AG can file charges without empaneling a grand jury, called filing by information. There is also a civil component to RICO that many people forget about. Not saying RICO implications here but just a thought.
they could. we shall see if that's what they did (if there is no indictment).

edit: not the reporters can be trusted, but this appears to be 'civil':

https://abc7ny.com/post/department-justice-filing-charges-new-york-top-officials-immigration-policies-attorney-general-pam-bondi-says/15899156/

"The civil complaint was not immediately available to reporters at the news conference, but Bondi said the lawsuit was centered around New York's Green Light Law that she claimed prohibits the state's sheriff's department and other agencies from sharing motor vehicle data with federal authorities for purposes of immigration enforcement."
Reply Quote
2
1 edit
milner79
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Funky Winkerbean • 5:17p, 2/12/25
Funky Winkerbean said:
Our government is serving us again.
Reply Quote
20
Im Gipper
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to fredfredunderscorefred • 5:17p, 2/12/25
Quote:
But she says charges here - any indictment? would be surprised she misspoke but inclined to think this will be more civil also. EDIT: but criminal SHOULD probably be filed against some of these dems


This is probably correct.

I'm Gipper
Reply Quote
Im Gipper
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Rockdoc • 5:20p, 2/12/25
Rockdoc said:
Let them hire some of those high dollar attorneys. See how they like it!


Tax payers of NY pick up this tab.

I'm Gipper
Reply Quote
Rockdoc
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Im Gipper • 5:20p, 2/12/25
AG
Im Gipper said:
Rockdoc said:
Let them hire some of those high dollar attorneys. See how they like it!


Tax payers of NY pick up this tab.

That works too.
Reply Quote
4
aggiehawg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
5:30p, 2/12/25
AG
Is this possibly related?

Reply Quote
25
DCAggie13y
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to AtticusMatlock • 5:33p, 2/12/25
AG
AtticusMatlock said:
Is there an obligation of state governments to help enforce immigration law? Or is there merely an obligation to get out of the way? The devil will be in the details of this suit. If they are being charged with simply not helping I don't think it can go anywhere. If they're being accused of openly harboring and blocking enforcement, that's a different animal.


She said they have a tip off policy to notify illegal immigrants if Federal agents inquire about them. That seems like a clear violation.
Reply Quote
17
titan
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to aggiehawg • 5:33p, 2/12/25
S
aggiehawg said:
Charges, not a civil lawsuit...criminal charges unless she misspoke there.
Is there a scenario where can go after a former AG? As in arrest Garland?
Reply Quote
10
Funky Winkerbean
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to aggiehawg • 7:24p, 2/12/25
AG
aggiehawg said:
Is this possibly related?

That is my suspicion as well. Keep a healthy stock of illegals in population to warrant the "aid" money, then take a cut of the action.
Reply Quote
3
Bobaloo
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:19p, 2/12/25
Once again…I think I'm in love!
Reply Quote
2
JFABNRGR
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to aggiehawg • 11:43p, 2/12/25
AG
aggiehawg said:
Is this possibly related?



Thats some viagra right there…..
Reply Quote
4
Page 1 of 2 ▼
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.