Need to fire a bunch of libs at Yosemite and GC Park

7,979 Views | 127 Replies | Last: 5 hrs ago by Squadron7
Logos Stick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
They are working to make things difficult for citizens trying to use the park to gen opposition to Trump cutting workers. Regime Media is bed with them.


Quote:

This is intentional infliction of harm on the public in order to gin up opposition to staffing cuts.

doubledog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"Yosemite National Park is 759,620 acres" roughly 1000 acres per summer employee. That is a lot of ground to cover for a park ranger (I know most of it is mountains).
ABATTBQ11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
They fired the only locksmith because he started a permanent position last March after years as a seasonal employee. He's probational. If you want to blame someone, blame the decision makers who said, "Fire all the probationary employees."
rgag12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So the libs are angry when Trump fires large proportions of a department, and they're also mad when he leaves entire departments essentially unscathed?

Very funny
Logos Stick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ABATTBQ11 said:

They fired the only locksmith because he started last March after years as a seasonal employee. He's probational. If you want to blame someone, blame the decision makers who said, "For all the probationary employees."

The fact that they have only one locksmith in the first place is weapons grade idiocy.
Ag87H2O
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Sounds to me like Trump needs to hire them back and then fire whoever at the top decided to let those specific personnel go.

Purposeful attempts to undermine your boss should result in a short path to the unemployment line.
Owlagdad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sounds like the locksmith's supervisor needs to be fired because he couldnt step in there to do it. Surely there was a plan of some bolt cutters somewhere. What did they do when this guy was sick or on vacation?
Sounds like hit piece that should not be directed at Trump, but at managers who sat on their ass.
txaggie_08
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

He was the sole employee with the keys and the institutional knowledge needed to rescue visitors from locked restrooms."


Wtf
ABATTBQ11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Logos Stick said:

ABATTBQ11 said:

They fired the only locksmith because he started last March after years as a seasonal employee. He's probational. If you want to blame someone, blame the decision makers who said, "For all the probationary employees."

The fact that they have only one locksmith in the first place is weapons grade idiocy.


So... You want them spending more money?
Logos Stick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ABATTBQ11 said:

Logos Stick said:

ABATTBQ11 said:

They fired the only locksmith because he started last March after years as a seasonal employee. He's probational. If you want to blame someone, blame the decision makers who said, "For all the probationary employees."

The fact that they have only one locksmith in the first place is weapons grade idiocy.


So... You want them spending more money?

They have 1000 employees. Surely they can replace one of them with a backup locksmith. Or a person who can do both jobs.

Are you seriously arguing that having a single point of failure is smart?!?! LOL
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ABATTBQ11 said:

Logos Stick said:

ABATTBQ11 said:

They fired the only locksmith because he started last March after years as a seasonal employee. He's probational. If you want to blame someone, blame the decision makers who said, "For all the probationary employees."

The fact that they have only one locksmith in the first place is weapons grade idiocy.


So... You want them spending more money?
Get this straw man outta here.
ABATTBQ11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ag87H2O said:

Sounds to me like Trump needs to hire them back and then fire whoever at the top decided to let those specific personnel go.

Purposeful attempts to undermine your boss should result in a short path to the unemployment line.


Well then he needs to fire himself because this is what happens when you say, "Fire all the probationary employees," with no idea of who they are or what they do. They fired the people he told them to fire.
BCG Disciple
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Should have asked him to tell someone else where the keys were. These aren't complicated equations. Clearly management is trying to agitate the public.

And to the dipsh** that gets locked in a restroom, you probably shouldn't be at the park anyway. Thank the Trump administration for making you wait a day on the sh**er instead of your inevitable death by some other Darwinian means in the park.
Catag94
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I hope they fired whoever's in charge of the national park likely not probationary, because the overall general manager who only had one person out of all those employees having keys is a buffoon.
Ag87H2O
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ABATTBQ11 said:

Ag87H2O said:

Sounds to me like Trump needs to hire them back and then fire whoever at the top decided to let those specific personnel go.

Purposeful attempts to undermine your boss should result in a short path to the unemployment line.


Well then he needs to fire himself because this is what happens when you say, "Fire all the probationary employees," with no idea of who they are or what they do. They fired the people he told them to fire.
Nobody is irreplaceable. There is no way with that many locks that someone else wasn't capable and prepared to do his job. Whatever did they do when this guy was sick or on vacation? This is sensationalism looking for a story to gig Musk and Trump.
Fins Up!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
You just assume everyone who works for the park service is a liberal. What about the USDA? APHIS?

I had a reservation canceled at a NP over spring break that I had to enter a lottery to get. I'm sure the ranger that was going to lead the tour was a relatively new employee. That sucks for us. Hopefully the park will have enough staff to be open when we arrive. I'm mad as hell about it. But it isn't the park - it's Trump being an idiot. (And I gladly voted for him, and would do it again.)

It is very wrong to assume that all government cuts are worthy and good. As a strong proponent and frequent visitor to national parks, these cuts make my blood boil because they aren't based on performance, necessity or essential need of the role. In other words, as a staunch conservative, I feel the cuts are stupid and without plan or reason. They are just being done for revenge.

There is waste and corruption in every government agency. So instead of just cutting people for the sake of it, wouldn't it be better to root out unproductive employees and unnecessary positions, and use merit? There are people at my company that need to be cut, based on merit or lack thereof.

It really sucks for people who have spent thousands of $$ to visit Yosemite to get there suddenly there is no one at the park to operate the park, including a locksmith. Yellowstone and Yosemite are huge. I would think that it would take a lot of people to run those parks, even without waste.

I am all for cuts of bureaucracy, but I didn't sign up for what happening.

What are you going to do when there are no food inspectors at the USDA? Or no APHIS inspectors? Or no one to disease test for avian influenza? Nope. Let's cut those people because they are all "liberals."

Sometimes conservatives are the dumbest people on the planet. And the cuts have already gone too far, IMO, because they haven't been done wisely. They've just been done to appease a base. We will all pay for it.
ABATTBQ11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Logos Stick said:

ABATTBQ11 said:

Logos Stick said:

ABATTBQ11 said:

They fired the only locksmith because he started last March after years as a seasonal employee. He's probational. If you want to blame someone, blame the decision makers who said, "For all the probationary employees."

The fact that they have only one locksmith in the first place is weapons grade idiocy.


So... You want them spending more money?

They have 1000 employees. Surely they can replace one of them with a backup locksmith. Or a person who can do both jobs.

Are you seriously arguing that having a single point of failure is smart?!?! LOL


My company has several hundred employees. Surely we can replace the one maintenance guy with someone from IT or a secretary to save money. Hell, maybe your company should fire all the secretaries and receptionists and just randomly route incoming calls. It'll just be a distributed responsibility to answer the phone and direct people to the right person.

They have a locksmith because all those 1000 other employees have jobs to do that don't involve locksmithing.
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Catag94 said:

I hope they fired whoever's in charge of the national park likely not probationary, because the overall general manager who only had one person out of all those employees having keys is a buffoon.
And likely a liar.
Logos Stick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ABATTBQ11 said:

Logos Stick said:

ABATTBQ11 said:

Logos Stick said:

ABATTBQ11 said:

They fired the only locksmith because he started last March after years as a seasonal employee. He's probational. If you want to blame someone, blame the decision makers who said, "For all the probationary employees."

The fact that they have only one locksmith in the first place is weapons grade idiocy.


So... You want them spending more money?

They have 1000 employees. Surely they can replace one of them with a backup locksmith. Or a person who can do both jobs.

Are you seriously arguing that having a single point of failure is smart?!?! LOL


My company has several hundred employees. Surely we can replace the one maintenance guy with someone from IT or a secretary to save money. Hell, maybe your company should fire all the secretaries and receptionists and just randomly route incoming calls. It'll just be a distributed responsibility to answer the phone and direct people to the right person.

They have a locksmith because all those 1000 other employees have jobs to do that don't involve locksmithing.

LMAO. It is stupid and you know it. Somebody else whose primary job is something other than the keys is capable of knowing where the damn keys are and what they go to and how to use them.

Also this is the government. 50% of the employees are not doing **** anyway!


sorry folks, ole Joe is on vacation and he is the key guy. Park is closed for 2 weeks!
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ABATTBQ11 said:




My company has several hundred employees. Surely we can replace the one maintenance guy with someone from IT or a secretary to save money. Hell, maybe your company should fire all the secretaries and receptionists and just randomly route incoming calls. It'll just be a distributed responsibility to answer the phone and direct people to the right person.

They have a locksmith because all those 1000 other employees have jobs to do that don't involve locksmithing.
And surely we can stop defending the indefensible. If Donald Trump has to visit every location of every agency in the federal government to make sure it is being run correctly, the average federal employee is even worse than I thought and we are wasting far more taxpayer money than I ever would have believed possible.
RogerFurlong
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Institutional knowledge on how to open doors. Only the government would keep all the keys with one guy. Did the boss not get the keys when he was fired? Complete idiots.
4stringAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ag87H2O said:

ABATTBQ11 said:

Ag87H2O said:

Sounds to me like Trump needs to hire them back and then fire whoever at the top decided to let those specific personnel go.

Purposeful attempts to undermine your boss should result in a short path to the unemployment line.


Well then he needs to fire himself because this is what happens when you say, "Fire all the probationary employees," with no idea of who they are or what they do. They fired the people he told them to fire.
Nobody is irreplaceable. There is no way with that many locks that someone else wasn't capable and prepared to do his job. Whatever did they do when this guy was sick or on vacation? This is sensationalism looking for a story to gig Musk and Trump.
Todays fired federal worker = yesterday's Gazan. Similarly today's Ukranian citizen = yesterday's Gazan.

The media playing up sob stories of both of these groups is identical to their daily stories of suffering Gazans since the 10-7 terrorist attack in Israel.

Its an old tired strategy but works on the feeble minded feelz of leftists and never Trump ****s.
Fightin_Aggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Logos Stick said:

ABATTBQ11 said:

Logos Stick said:

ABATTBQ11 said:

They fired the only locksmith because he started last March after years as a seasonal employee. He's probational. If you want to blame someone, blame the decision makers who said, "For all the probationary employees."

The fact that they have only one locksmith in the first place is weapons grade idiocy.


So... You want them spending more money?

They have 1000 employees. Surely they can replace one of them with a backup locksmith. Or a person who can do both jobs.

Are you seriously arguing that having a single point of failure is smart?!?! LOL
No no no!


This is an either or! Govt never makes mistakes so 1 locksmith good no locksmith bad

Govt always right except when orange man in charge

Orange man bad!
The world needs mean tweets

My Pronouns Ultra and MAGA

Trump 2024
flashplayer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I was at Independence hall the other day and one of the NPS park guides giving a tour was discussing the precedent set by Washington of serving 2 terms. She ended it with "and ever since, the power of the presidency has been transferred peacefully with 2 exceptions: Lincoln's election before the Civil War and January 6th."

Bunch of lib trash.
Tony Franklins Other Shoe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Owlagdad said:

Sounds like the locksmith's supervisor needs to be fired because he couldnt step in there to do it. Surely there was a plan of some bolt cutters somewhere. What did they do when this guy was sick or on vacation?
Sounds like hit piece that should not be directed at Trump, but at managers who sat on their ass.
Lloyd Austin doesn't have any issue with this.

Person Not Capable of Pregnancy
Owlagdad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LOL, as a 2Lt, I knew enough to be dangerous, but enough to get things done-- even when that call at 4:45 to get over to HQs and make sure the Christmas lights were up correctly, so the General wouldnt be pissed off. Guess with Signal MOS, the Colonel knew I could hang wire.


This story is nothing but whining, and I imagine not very truthful and highly exagerated.
Wildmen03
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Also a locksmith is more than just knowing where the keys are. They swap out cores, cut keys, fix broken locks and they may be in charge of checking keys in and out. Plus it's likely not just buildings, it could be vehicles, trailers etc.

My employer has 2 full time locksmiths and there are times where that's not enough.
CS78
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You keep firing until someone figures out how to get the job done.
CheeseSndwch
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The public sector loves to enact malicious compliance because they've never dealt with the real world consequences of getting fired for poor performance.
Logos Stick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Fins Up! said:



Sometimes conservatives are the dumbest people on the planet. And the cuts have already gone too far, IMO, because they haven't been done wisely. They've just been done to appease a base. We will all pay for it.

The cuts seem to have not been done wisely because of the completely inefficient and illogical way the government operates.

If cutting a single new, probationary employee causes a shutdown of a park, then the problem is not with cutting that person.
CanyonAg77
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
National Park Service employees are actively and openly rebelling against lawful authority.

They even have a Facebook group dedicated to it

https://www.facebook.com/AltUSNationalParkService

Quote:

The official "Resistance" team of U.S. National Park Service....

We apologize for the constant flood of negative updatesthings have been absolutely chaotic. Amidst all of this, we want to take a moment to recognize the resistance members who have stood up and defied the Trump administration. Many have lost their jobs, and we have been dropping like flies, but we have remained true to our oath.

Our coalition faces relentless attacks and threats. People constantly question who we are and how we operate. Somehow, we are everywhere and nowhere at once. For the past eight years, we have worked to protect those within our ranks.

While it may seem like we do things without reason, there is purpose behind it all. The administration is growing increasingly paranoidconducting loyalty tests, searching devices, interrogating employees, making threats through the attorney general, and now even implementing polygraphs. Yet, the resistance endures.
Logos Stick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
wow
MD1993
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I have been to several national parks including Yellow Stone and Big Bend. I never spoke to a Park Ranger any of the times. Now, I know they have a lot of behind-the-scenes work to do, but this is silly that ONE person had the keys to all of this park. Sounds like a Barney Fife situation that the other rangers are too stupid to be trusted with key to a toilet.
titan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
CanyonAg77 said:

National Park Service employees are actively and openly rebelling against lawful authority.

They even have a Facebook group dedicated to it

https://www.facebook.com/AltUSNationalParkService

Quote:

The official "Resistance" team of U.S. National Park Service....

We apologize for the constant flood of negative updatesthings have been absolutely chaotic. Amidst all of this, we want to take a moment to recognize the resistance members who have stood up and defied the Trump administration. Many have lost their jobs, and we have been dropping like flies, but we have remained true to our oath.

Our coalition faces relentless attacks and threats. People constantly question who we are and how we operate. Somehow, we are everywhere and nowhere at once. For the past eight years, we have worked to protect those within our ranks.

While it may seem like we do things without reason, there is purpose behind it all. The administration is growing increasingly paranoidconducting loyalty tests, searching devices, interrogating employees, making threats through the attorney general, and now even implementing polygraphs. Yet, the resistance endures.

It gives a window to just abolish the present setup and re-structure to a more tourist friendly format. Also sell some of the land that seems excessively held by federal hands. Not the spectacular parks, but some sections of some of those states that are just locked up.
FrioAg 00:
Leftist Democrats "have completely overplayed the Racism accusation. Honestly my first reaction when I hear it today is to assume bad intentions by the accuser, not the accused."
GeeBee
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Summary: Some people got fired that actually might work ( key word "might") at a national park.


I'm no scientologist , but I think we'll make it as a country. I know it's a very tumultuous time and things are touch and go since a lock smith got fired, but keep the faith and hold steady. It will be ok. I promise.
Last Page
Page 1 of 4
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.