Ag_of_08 said:

---

So the fed taking power from the states is good if you agree with it?

---

Are you familiar with Title IX?

Oh…I just realized which poster I was talking to. Makes sense now.

Ag_of_08 said:

---

So the fed taking power from the states is good if you agree with it?

---

Biden forced Texas to be invaded. 15 million illegal border crossings during Biden's term. Biden actively fought Abbott and AG Paxton in court on this. Biden launched countless lawsuits to even remove deterrents in Texas like buoys. The constitution says that the federal government will protect the states from invasion. Biden actively aided and abetted the invasion.

Covid + DEI in 2020 was the biggest 1-2 punch of all time.

Someone took their best shot at destroying the US and western civilization.

Ag_of_08 said:

---

So the fed taking power from the states is good if you agree with it?

---

As long as the Fed gov doesn't fund it, they can do what they want!

rgag12 said:

---

Honestly, Maine is going to win that court case at the Supreme Court. Unless Congress passes a law outlawing men in women's sports then they can do what they want to, even if there is an EO.

---

OK. Then Title IX is gone. I mean if there is no consistent definition of "woman," there cannot be any discrimination.

Texas A&M _______ basketball team
Texas A&M _______ basketball team

Ag_of_08 said:

---

So the fed taking power from the states is good if you agree with it?

---

If it saves Women's Sports then yes! Title IX is the law.

Also if it saves a female from being killed from a spiked ball, hit ball or hand then absolutely.

This isn't State's rights. It is Human Rights.

rgag12 said:

---

Honestly, Maine is going to win that court case at the Supreme Court. Unless Congress passes a law outlawing men in women's sports then they can do what they want to, even if there is an EO.

The only stick Trump has is funding.

---

Title 9 allows the executive to frame Title 9. They will lose.

We just need to ask those who are opposed to Trump on this issue why they hate women and why they don't want women to have an equal opportunity.

I still don't understand how the party of feminism so quickly kicked feminism to the curb in favor of mentally ill men.

Stat Monitor Repairman said:

---

Some sort of mind virus.

The mental contagion of covid was targeted at the masses.

This trans deal is somehow targeted at specific leaders. It's inexplicable political position to take.

---

A little quick research and my own deductions.

77 year old Janet spent her fertile years pursuing her career in leftist democrat politics. Didn't marry until nearly 40 and never had a child of her own, although her husband had five with his first wife which I am sure Janet resented deeply. Husband died over a decade ago.

She's old, bitter, alone, childless/no grandkids. Literally the template of the miserable lib white woman. Sadly their ranks are going to expand by millions in the next couple decades.

They latch on fiercely to woke ideology, even when rejected by the majority, because it is all they have in their meaningless, unfullfilled, lives.

93MarineHorn said:

---

akm91 said:

---

The idea that politicians are sticking with this transgender nonsense is just astounding.

---

It's fascinating. Trump is giving them the "out" and a chance to let this losing issue die, but their TDS is too much to overcome.

---

When fleas on a dog get alarmed, they will tend to try to escape to the underside of the animal. To catch them, turn the dog on his back and watch the fleas run off the belly to the back. Then turn the dog back on his legs and the fleas will race back to the belly. In other words you can get them run to where you want and expose themselves if you keep repeating this process. I call it "flipping the dog".

This is what Trump (and others on occasion) can do when his opposition is so programmed to run to whatever the opposite position is from him that they can't see how they are exposing themselves. He can just keep flipping the dog until they find themselves trapped by their own reflexes.

In this case, he knows he can flip the dog on trans and watch these libs scurry to the most extreme pro-trans positions totally exposing their insanity to the more level-headed population.

rgag12 said:

---

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

rgag12 said:

---

Honestly, Maine is going to win that court case at the Supreme Court. Unless Congress passes a law outlawing men in women's sports then they can do what they want to, even if there is an EO.

---

OK. Then Title IX is gone.

---

I'm not familiar with title IX too well. It seems like the issue is defining what a man and a woman is. Not trying to be a smart ass, but to me unless the definition of the sexes is codified in title IX then the states can skirt around anything in there in regards to letting men play women's sports.

---

If they want to act like obtuse children, they will be treated like obtuse children. The money is not theirs.

rgag12 said:

---

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

rgag12 said:

---

Honestly, Maine is going to win that court case at the Supreme Court. Unless Congress passes a law outlawing men in women's sports then they can do what they want to, even if there is an EO.

---

OK. Then Title IX is gone.

---

I'm not familiar with title IX too well. It seems like the issue is defining what a man and a woman is. Not trying to be a smart ass, but to me unless the definition of the sexes is codified in title IX then the states can skirt around anything in there in regards to letting men play women's sports.

---

Why on earth would we even need to define the sexes? There are only 2.

Keep working on it, lady. You ain't nearly badass enough.

Stat Monitor Repairman said:

---

Quote:

---

Literally the template of the miserable lib white woman

---

Go to any whole foods during the middle of the day and you'll see a horde of these zombies.

They all come out at the same time.

---

Hmmmm. Guessing that's the window between The View and the evening lineup on MSNBC.

The Shank Ag said:

---

You can just see the hate in those eyes

---

Physiognomy rarely lies

Quote:

---

His job is to execute laws passed by Congress. Executive orders aren't laws.

---

Seems like a major course correction over the past 32-days no?

It was fine to bootstrap an OSHA regulation forcing a experimental drug on American workers,

but not so much to withhold funding for entities that allow males in female sports.

You see, congress is very busy naming post offices. They don't really have time to dedicate to these kinds of seminal issues, like no men in women's sports.

Quote:

---

He is not the law. He is the president. His job is to execute laws passed by Congress. Executive orders aren't laws.

---

That's true. And you never said a peep while Biden ignored all of our immigration laws for four years. He even created policies that were contrary to our laws.

Where were you?

For 'Ag of 08' or anyone else who doesn't recognize or acknowledge the difference between the sexes, here's your chance to clear things up:

If there truly is no difference, IMO we should just make all teams unisex in all sports, heck even allow more players to be on every team since the funding will be combined.

Unless you wreck the standard of only the best players play, how many (formerly classified as biological) women would even make the teams or be the starters, in each sport?

Feel free to give examples for the biologically born females and their future numbers in sports. TIA.

Historians will look back at this time in the history of the United States and wonder, who in the actual **** argued that biological men should be allowed to play in women's sports?

Actually, I (and many others) are asking this right now. Who in the actual **** wants biological men to complete in women's sports?

Hullabaloonatic said:

---

Stat Monitor Repairman said:

---

Quote:

---

His job is to execute laws passed by Congress. Executive orders aren't laws.

---

They don't really have time to dedicate to these kinds of seminal issues, like no men in women's sports.

---

There are a total of like 11 trans athletes whose sum total impact on the world is the loss of a couple of high school track matches and now we have to have autocracy.

The brainwashing, it works!

---

so that's a lie.

but let's take your bogus stats for a fact

if there are only 11 trans athletes as you say-

WHY DO THEY NEED TO COMPETE WITH WOMEN?

it's only 11 people! so as you say, who cares it is just an infinitesimal group of the country so we should not have to allow them to do anything.

This just proves that the trans and their supporters were all a bunch of theater kids who have no idea what actual competition is about.

The basic question is why is there not a rush of biological females competing and dominating men's sports.