HTownAg98 said:
That's not the SC ruling. We all know he let in tons of people. I want to know what SCOTUS ruling he ignored.
You mean sc has never rules on immigration?
Late night Supreme Court ruling halts gang deportations
15,257 Views |
179 Replies |
Last: 1 yr ago by BullHaulAg
You mean sc has never rules on immigration?
TexAgs91 said:HTownAg98 said:Cinco Ranch Aggie said:
Time for Trump to pull a Biden and ignore this SC ruling.
Explain what ruling Biden ignored.
Erasing student loan debt
He did no such thing. He used other programs that weren't subject to the SCOTUS decision to forgive student loan debt. We can certainly debate about whether he should have done that (it would be a short debate because he shouldn't have), but it didn't defy any court order.
HoustonAg9999 said:HTownAg98 said:
That's not the SC ruling. We all know he let in tons of people. I want to know what SCOTUS ruling he ignored.
You mean sc has never rules on immigration?
Don't be dense; of course they rule on immigration. But I want to know specifically what court order he ignored.
HTownAg98 said:HoustonAg9999 said:HTownAg98 said:
That's not the SC ruling. We all know he let in tons of people. I want to know what SCOTUS ruling he ignored.
You mean sc has never rules on immigration?
Don't be dense; of course they rule on immigration. But I want to know specifically what court order he ignored.
Weird flex here point is biden ignored laws he didn't like so should Trump
That wasn't the question that was asked.
Semantics FTW!
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
Send them anyway
HoustonAg9999 said:HTownAg98 said:HoustonAg9999 said:HTownAg98 said:
That's not the SC ruling. We all know he let in tons of people. I want to know what SCOTUS ruling he ignored.
You mean sc has never rules on immigration?
Don't be dense; of course they rule on immigration. But I want to know specifically what court order he ignored.
Weird flex here point is biden ignored laws he didn't like so should Trump
Trump should not ignore laws he doesn't like. Courts don't make laws, remember? He should ignore politically motivated SCOTUS rulings that undermine the executive office's authorities.
As others have said, if SCOTUS is ruling that Dems can illegally import 10 million illegals every 4 years they're in office but we aren't allowed to deport them then it's game over for America. They will just keep importing them and resettling them into key election areas, get them vote and establish their China style statist authoritarian oligarchy that pretends to be a communist regime
When one President can ignore his responsibilities and let millions of illegals into the country but it requires that each deportation be presided over and authorized by a judge, we have no country left.
HTownAg98 said:TexAgs91 said:HTownAg98 said:Cinco Ranch Aggie said:
Time for Trump to pull a Biden and ignore this SC ruling.
Explain what ruling Biden ignored.
Erasing student loan debt
He did no such thing. He used other programs that weren't subject to the SCOTUS decision to forgive student loan debt. We can certainly debate about whether he should have done that (it would be a short debate because he shouldn't have), but it didn't defy any court order.
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/despite-collapse-of-his-forgiveness-plan-millions-had-student-loans-canceled-under-biden
he just needs to find another law to deport them under
there's a whole bunch on the books
there's a whole bunch on the books
Or maybe deport them to another country ? ? ? I hear Antarctica is Nice.W said:
he just needs to find another law to deport them under
there's a whole bunch on the books
lb3 said:
When one President can ignore his responsibilities and let millions of illegals into the country but it requires that each deportation be presided over and authorized by a judge, we have not country left.
Apparently Dems presidents can do whatever they want no matter how illegal with zero pushback from Republicans or the court but a GOP president is not allowed to do anything no matter how in the scope of his power as he is fought by Dems and the courts every step of the way
exactly lmaoagent-maroon said:
Semantics FTW!
Deport them all now! Speed it up! America will be destroyed from within if we don't.
It's been a little bit since I read the Constitution, but is it not the job of the executive to execute laws? Immigration laws being part of those laws?
Seems like Trump, unlike Biden, is actually doing just that. Not sure where the SC, or anyone, has a say in it.
Seems like Trump, unlike Biden, is actually doing just that. Not sure where the SC, or anyone, has a say in it.
Plus MS13 is officially classified a terrorist organization.
Funky Winkerbean said:
Plus MS13 is officially classified a terrorist organization.
Well, yeah, that's just icing on the dirty, dirty cake.
I recently obtained a copy of the Constitution and reading it closely, especially the Amendments 1-5. I don't see any way that the reference to "person" or "persons" doesn't refer to anyone but citizens of the United States of America. The references to "persons" in the first 4 definitely refer to citizens so in the context 5 does also. This is where all the concern about "due process" is coming from. You cannot take "all" to refer to everyone that might be here. It was "all" of certain group and that group was legal citizens of the USA.
We ought to flood their neighbohoods with these violent invaders. Now is the time to use one of the lefts standard tactics. We need to be right outside their house 24/7 applying maximum pressure. Somebody posted a poll that 97% of the public supported deportations of criminal aliens. These two are scumbags. The fact they had to do it in the middle of the night on a weekend shows they know they are scum too !! As a white guy I am sooo sick of white women. They are the herpes of humanity. In terms of danger to America they are right behind or tied with the CCP. However, they are 100% ahead of the russians !!!Old Sarge said:
Chief Justice Roberts is compromised, and Barrett came in under the guise of being conservative, but is a leftist snake in the grass.
Both are going to work actively to thwart any good the current or any future Administrations try to do to save our country from the vile, evil, and degenerate Leftist DemocRat Party.
P.s. Amy Coney Barrett is like John Roberts's intellectual little puppy. Wherever he goes, she blindly follows. Terrible!!
Ship says they will vacate:
This is why I suggested last night that extra-judicial reasons were behind the votes of the 7 Justices who granted the Stay.
— Shipwreckedcrew (@shipwreckedcrew) April 20, 2025
And I think they will vacate it tomorrow now that the Fifth Circuit has noted all the procedural defects in their Circuit. https://t.co/yy34ucHNX5
I’m having trouble getting over the fact that Democrats sent a US Senator on a 4.5 hour flight to another country to fight to release a criminal illegal immigrant…
— Matt Van Swol (@matt_vanswol) April 19, 2025
…but couldn’t find ANY time to make a short road trip to Western North Carolina after Hurricane Helene to help us pic.twitter.com/AGleL4a4Bm
SCOTUS are basically traitors
Junction71 said:
I recently obtained a copy of the Constitution and reading it closely, especially the Amendments 1-5. I don't see any way that the reference to "person" or "persons" doesn't refer to anyone but citizens of the United States of America. The references to "persons" in the first 4 definitely refer to citizens so in the context 5 does also. This is where all the concern about "due process" is coming from. You cannot take "all" to refer to everyone that might be here. It was "all" of certain group and that group was legal citizens of the USA.
I struggle with this as well. If the 2nd doesn't apply to non-citizens without restrictions then why do the others? It seems logic would assert that you can't have it both ways.
bobbranco said:Old Sarge said:
Barrett came in under the guise of being conservative, but is a leftist snake in the grass.
The woman power camaraderie coupled with the milquetoast compassionate Bush style conservatism is her style.
Her confirmation did go a little too smoothly.
Trump should take the worst of the worst and most violent criminals that SCOTUS wouldn't let him deport and drop them off at the driveways of all these judges.
How long does it take a court in Eagle Pass or Del Rio to send an illegal back when caught? Hours….. Just line them up one after another 24/7 and go.
Being in TexAgs jail changes a man……..no, not really
Presidents should ignore the Supreme Court? Did that include Biden, Obama, and Clinton, as well? Or only Trump?TexAgs91 said:HoustonAg9999 said:HTownAg98 said:HoustonAg9999 said:HTownAg98 said:
That's not the SC ruling. We all know he let in tons of people. I want to know what SCOTUS ruling he ignored.
You mean sc has never rules on immigration?
Don't be dense; of course they rule on immigration. But I want to know specifically what court order he ignored.
Weird flex here point is biden ignored laws he didn't like so should Trump
Trump should not ignore laws he doesn't like. Courts don't make laws, remember? He should ignore politically motivated SCOTUS rulings that undermine the executive office's authorities.
Under the AEA, habeas is the only judicial review and as I have said before, habeas is its own legal animal and is singular in nature. Does a class action lie in habeas?
My first thought is that is does not. So that is a question for the district court first. Then the 5th and then SCOTUS.
So in the overall scheme of things, the delay caused by the 7 Justices is going to end up clarifying the issues here that have been mostly overlooked thus far.
My first thought is that is does not. So that is a question for the district court first. Then the 5th and then SCOTUS.
So in the overall scheme of things, the delay caused by the 7 Justices is going to end up clarifying the issues here that have been mostly overlooked thus far.
As these gang bangers get their 15 minute court date, I hope someone keeps a running tally of the time and expense incurred for the 100% conviction rates likely coming.
Being in TexAgs jail changes a man……..no, not really
ProgN said:
Trump should take the worst of the worst and most violent criminals that SCOTUS wouldn't let him deport and drop them off at the driveways of all these judges.
After terminating their security details.
Great minds think alike!!!! I would drop them off at their kids house. Even their grandkids house/school. These violent invaders are going to be a SOMEBODY'S kids house or grandkids house. Why involve an innocent American when you can take the problem to the absolute corrupt POS's inner circle!!!
DannyDuberstein said:
Send them anyway
I'm ok if he just deports them halfway. See if they can swim the rest of the way to El Salvador.
Have them sign a waiver for $100 and a bus ticket. Skip the court system altogether.B-1 83 said:
How long does it take a court in Eagle Pass or Del Rio to send an illegal back when caught? Hours….. Just line them up one after another 24/7 and go.
Featured Stories
See All
6:59
11h ago
4.1k
Photo Gallery: 102,000 pack Kyle Field for Banana Ball
by Daniel Grant
13:16
16h ago
3.8k
Texas A&M tennis begins NCAA Tourney with two Saturday sweeps
by Luke Evangelist
15:58
12h ago
2.4k
DeepETX_Aggie
I appreciate our social media team but this wasn't a great look
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
29
GT_Aggie2015
I appreciate our social media team but this wasn't a great look
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
26