AgLiving06 said:

---

She's getting destroyed in her claims about Macron's wife, so now trying to skirt the same laws by claiming "allegedly."

Seriously, her husband needs to step in and get her the help she needs. This isn't normal behavior, and something is clearly wrong with her.

---

Yep, and its obvious to everyone but her and those who will white knight for her and excuse all of her actions.

When you’re vehemently against foreign wars but would do anything to protect Candace Owens from Jewish assassins sent at the behest of France’s transgender queen. https://t.co/DVv1OW3n9J pic.twitter.com/0fdONpo8Es

— Frank McCormick (@CBHeresy) November 24, 2025

now Candace is adding in a second French hit squad coming after her after she previously discussed MONTHS AGO that the French were sending a hit team to take her out.

coincidentally, in all of France the French do not have a competent hit team, so have to add an Israeli member to go and eliminate a 115 pound black woman in Nashville.

The Candace Owens vs. Macron Lawsuit — A Complete Collapse in Real Time, a thread:🧵 pic.twitter.com/kzg6J9xJmO

— Green Beret Nap Time (@GBNT1952) November 25, 2025

She was probably right about some things so someone fed her this to make her look even more crazy.. It's a common tactic. I don't think anyone would be here or listening to her podcast if they didn't release those fake text messages between Charlie's killer and his Trans boyfriend that sounded like a cop wrote them.

I do thank Candace for teaching me more about mental illness than I ever thought I would know:

Apophenia - the tendency to perceive meaningful connections between unrelated things

Postpartum psychosis- after she gave birth to several children in recent years

Personality traits such as those associated with Narcissistic or Histrionic Personality Disorders.

Narcissistic Personality Traits
grandiosity, lack of empathy, the need for admiration, and hypersensitivity to criticism. This doesn't mean they meet the threshold for Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD), but the traits alone can incentivize confrontational and often delusional rhetoric.

In Owens' case, this may manifest in her confident promotion of conspiracy theories, her dismissal of opposing views as corrupt or evil, and her consistent framing of herself as a misunderstood truth-teller.

2. Paranoia and Control Fantasies
Repeatedly suggesting that powerful shadow forces are orchestrating global events without credible evidence may reflect paranoid ideation.

Many media personalities flirt with this line because it keeps audiences hooked. If the world is under siege by a hidden elite, then you, the viewer, become part of a heroic resistance simply by tuning in.

3. Histrionic Communication Style
Owens often frames debates in theatrical, emotionally loaded terms another hallmark of histrionic personality features. These include attention-seeking, exaggerated statements, and dramatic shifts in affect. It's easy to dismiss this as mere performance. But when the line between on-air persona and off-air identity blurs, the theatrical can become pathological.

4. Hypomanic Traits
increased energy, impulsivity, irritability, and a flood of grand ideas. While full-blown bipolar disorder involves more severe disruptions, individuals with persistent subclinical hypomanic traits may cycle through extreme opinions, pick public fights, and generate a constant stream of inflammatory content.

Clinical Diagnosis of Owens Mental Illness

A picture is worth a thousand words.

it would be humiliating to have defended Candace in the past three years...

and then watch this discourse on her "quick cursory check of the internet"

which led her to discover the Bee Conspiracy that murdered Charlie Kirk:

If Candace Owens truly believed Brigitte Macron was behind Charlie Kirk’s assassination, why did she spend weeks claiming the killer was groomed by an underground communist death cult centered around bees?

pic.twitter.com/8BXPlrrtaN

— Eyal Yakoby (@EYakoby) November 25, 2025

Haleyscomet50 said:

---

She was probably right about some things so someone fed her this to make her look even more crazy.. It's a common tactic. I don't think anyone would be here or listening to her podcast if they didn't release those fake text messages between Charlie's killer and his Trans boyfriend that sounded like a cop wrote them.

---

Lmao - please tell me what things she was "probably right" about.

No official report filed.

The reason wannabe Hussy Smollet didn't file an official report is that filing a false report to law enforcement/FBI is a crime. She knows her claims are false.

So instead she may have sent some texts claiming a Yarmulke-wearing assassin with a baggette is out to get her, and… https://t.co/WmELDDRffc

— AG (@AGHamilton29) December 2, 2025

LMCane said:

---

it would be humiliating to have defended Candace in the past three years...

and then watch this discourse on her "quick cursory check of the internet"

which led her to discover the Bee Conspiracy that murdered Charlie Kirk:

If Candace Owens truly believed Brigitte Macron was behind Charlie Kirk’s assassination, why did she spend weeks claiming the killer was groomed by an underground communist death cult centered around bees?

pic.twitter.com/8BXPlrrtaN

— Eyal Yakoby (@EYakoby) November 25, 2025

---

That was nuts. When saw "Bee conspiracy" and mention of Macrons I thought at once of the bee, the royal symbol of the Napoleonic Empire. But then watching the video, she means literally bee symbology, tied to the state of Utah's flag and also some Polish underground and not what was expecting to hear at all. But that random messages she was getting from a school (unamed) would somehow clue to a plot is beyond perplexing.

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Haleyscomet50 said:

---

She was probably right about some things so someone fed her this to make her look even more crazy.. It's a common tactic. I don't think anyone would be here or listening to her podcast if they didn't release those fake text messages between Charlie's killer and his Trans boyfriend that sounded like a cop wrote them.

---

Lmao - please tell me what things she was "probably right" about.

---

She is right about the text messages between killer and boyfriend. She's also right that Charlie was moving away from his Israel stance. Even after numerous members of his organization denied it. Until someone released the text messages. Sure she is a crazy person but other people's lies give her a platform and a audience.

Haleyscomet50 said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Haleyscomet50 said:

---

She was probably right about some things so someone fed her this to make her look even more crazy.. It's a common tactic. I don't think anyone would be here or listening to her podcast if they didn't release those fake text messages between Charlie's killer and his Trans boyfriend that sounded like a cop wrote them.

---

Lmao - please tell me what things she was "probably right" about.

---

She is right about the text messages between killer and boyfriend. She's also right that Charlie was moving away from his Israel stance. Even after numerous members of his organization denied it. Until someone released the text messages. Sure she is a crazy person but other people's lies give her a platform and a audience.

---

What is this in reference to?

I think she has been right about quite a lot (Macron is a dude) but lately it's getting a little…

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Haleyscomet50 said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Haleyscomet50 said:

---

She was probably right about some things so someone fed her this to make her look even more crazy.. It's a common tactic. I don't think anyone would be here or listening to her podcast if they didn't release those fake text messages between Charlie's killer and his Trans boyfriend that sounded like a cop wrote them.

---

Lmao - please tell me what things she was "probably right" about.

---

She is right about the text messages between killer and boyfriend. She's also right that Charlie was moving away from his Israel stance. Even after numerous members of his organization denied it. Until someone released the text messages. Sure she is a crazy person but other people's lies give her a platform and a audience.

---

What is this in reference to?

---

How the leaked text messages allegedly between Charlie's shooter and his furry BF were completely faked.

hmmm... I'm old enough to remember when some on the right were calling out Candace Owens for her insanity and for her claims that Erika Kirk and TPUSA were involved in the murder.

then I'm old enough to remember when the woke right cultists screamed "how dare you attack Candace!"

that was a month ago.

let's see what Candace has to say about it today:

Seamaster said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Haleyscomet50 said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Haleyscomet50 said:

---

She was probably right about some things so someone fed her this to make her look even more crazy.. It's a common tactic. I don't think anyone would be here or listening to her podcast if they didn't release those fake text messages between Charlie's killer and his Trans boyfriend that sounded like a cop wrote them.

---

Lmao - please tell me what things she was "probably right" about.

---

She is right about the text messages between killer and boyfriend. She's also right that Charlie was moving away from his Israel stance. Even after numerous members of his organization denied it. Until someone released the text messages. Sure she is a crazy person but other people's lies give her a platform and a audience.

---

What is this in reference to?

---

How the leaked text messages allegedly between Charlie's shooter and his furry BF were completely faked.

---

Faked by who did it turn out? Not the fact there was a furry BF correct.

titan said:

---

Seamaster said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Haleyscomet50 said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Haleyscomet50 said:

---

She was probably right about some things so someone fed her this to make her look even more crazy.. It's a common tactic. I don't think anyone would be here or listening to her podcast if they didn't release those fake text messages between Charlie's killer and his Trans boyfriend that sounded like a cop wrote them.

---

Lmao - please tell me what things she was "probably right" about.

---

She is right about the text messages between killer and boyfriend. She's also right that Charlie was moving away from his Israel stance. Even after numerous members of his organization denied it. Until someone released the text messages. Sure she is a crazy person but other people's lies give her a platform and a audience.

---

What is this in reference to?

---

How the leaked text messages allegedly between Charlie's shooter and his furry BF were completely faked.

---

Faked by who did it turn out? Not the fact there was a furry BF correct.

---

By somebody in law enforcement.

Go read the texts. No 20 yr couple in america communicate like that. It was clearly manufactured and leaked.

Haleyscomet50 said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Haleyscomet50 said:

---

She was probably right about some things so someone fed her this to make her look even more crazy.. It's a common tactic. I don't think anyone would be here or listening to her podcast if they didn't release those fake text messages between Charlie's killer and his Trans boyfriend that sounded like a cop wrote them.

---

Lmao - please tell me what things she was "probably right" about.

---

She is right about the text messages between killer and boyfriend. She's also right that Charlie was moving away from his Israel stance. Even after numerous members of his organization denied it. Until someone released the text messages. Sure she is a crazy person but other people's lies give her a platform and a audience.

---

More lies. or ignorant assumptions above.

REEVE: When you say you believe that Charlie Kirk was betrayed by someone close to him, what do you mean?

OWENS: I think that in the coming weeks there's going to be a lot of financial reports that are coming out, and I, first and foremost, do not believe that Tyler Robinson killed Charlie Kirk. I want to be very clear on that. Whether he was involved, I think the answer is yes. I think that's obvious.

REEVE: And your basis for saying he didn't act alone is what?

OWENS: I don't know, maybe the weird fed messages that were concocted out of thin air that had no time stamp, and were written like they were speaking in 1822, among other things. Their lack of an ability to answer any basic questions about what took place.

REEVE: But, do you have any proof that the messages were made up? Because that would be easily proven.

OWENS: Yeah, but they didn't put time stamps on them, and Discord came out and said they didn't exist.

REEVE: This was supposedly text messages, not Discord messages. It's my understanding from the indictment.

OWENS: I actually did not read that they were text messages.

Reeve then produced the indictment calling them "text messages."

REEVE: What would it be, like the feds are like, on a computer, like typing it out, back and forth?

OWENS: Yeah, that's exactly what it is. The feds made up the text messages.

REEVE: But you don't have anyone from, like, the FBI telling you that, or

OWENS: I have leaks.

REEVE: Okay, but has anyone said to you, even off the record, yeah we faked these?

OWENS: I have very strong sources everywhere, on both sides.

titan said:

---

Seamaster said:

---

How the leaked text messages allegedly between Charlie's shooter and his furry BF were completely faked.

---

Faked by who did it turn out? Not the fact there was a furry BF correct.

---

Whom

Seamaster said:

---

titan said:

---

Seamaster said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Haleyscomet50 said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Haleyscomet50 said:

---

She was probably right about some things so someone fed her this to make her look even more crazy.. It's a common tactic. I don't think anyone would be here or listening to her podcast if they didn't release those fake text messages between Charlie's killer and his Trans boyfriend that sounded like a cop wrote them.

---

Lmao - please tell me what things she was "probably right" about.

---

She is right about the text messages between killer and boyfriend. She's also right that Charlie was moving away from his Israel stance. Even after numerous members of his organization denied it. Until someone released the text messages. Sure she is a crazy person but other people's lies give her a platform and a audience.

---

What is this in reference to?

---

How the leaked text messages allegedly between Charlie's shooter and his furry BF were completely faked.

---

Faked by who did it turn out? Not the fact there was a furry BF correct.

---

By somebody in law enforcement.

Go read the texts. No 20 yr couple in america communicate like that. It was clearly manufactured and leaked.

---

oh clearly!

says some dude on a Texas Aggie message board.

WHAT EXACT EVIDENCE DO YOU HAVE TO CLAIM THE FBI IS LYING.

AND WHAT EXACT EVIDENCE DO YOU HAVE THAT THE FBI IS INVOLVED IN CRIMINAL ACTS

TO INVENT EVIDENCE TO FRAME AN INNOCENT SHOOTER?


other than you just typing that it's "clear".

Seamaster said:

---

titan said:

---

Seamaster said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Haleyscomet50 said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Haleyscomet50 said:

---

She was probably right about some things so someone fed her this to make her look even more crazy.. It's a common tactic. I don't think anyone would be here or listening to her podcast if they didn't release those fake text messages between Charlie's killer and his Trans boyfriend that sounded like a cop wrote them.

---

Lmao - please tell me what things she was "probably right" about.

---

She is right about the text messages between killer and boyfriend. She's also right that Charlie was moving away from his Israel stance. Even after numerous members of his organization denied it. Until someone released the text messages. Sure she is a crazy person but other people's lies give her a platform and a audience.

---

What is this in reference to?

---

How the leaked text messages allegedly between Charlie's shooter and his furry BF were completely faked.

---

Faked by who did it turn out? Not the fact there was a furry BF correct.

---

By somebody in law enforcement.

Go read the texts. No 20 yr couple in america communicate like that. It was clearly manufactured and leaked.

---

Be careful of those kind of arguments (italics). Never found them as persuasive as other types. They presume a bit too much. Like the teacher assuming a 20 year old writing like an accomplished archeologist is plagiarizing rather than emulating --doesn't always follow. Will take another look, never did get into them.

titan said:

---

Seamaster said:

---

titan said:

---

Seamaster said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Haleyscomet50 said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Haleyscomet50 said:

---

She was probably right about some things so someone fed her this to make her look even more crazy.. It's a common tactic. I don't think anyone would be here or listening to her podcast if they didn't release those fake text messages between Charlie's killer and his Trans boyfriend that sounded like a cop wrote them.

---

Lmao - please tell me what things she was "probably right" about.

---

She is right about the text messages between killer and boyfriend. She's also right that Charlie was moving away from his Israel stance. Even after numerous members of his organization denied it. Until someone released the text messages. Sure she is a crazy person but other people's lies give her a platform and a audience.

---

What is this in reference to?

---

How the leaked text messages allegedly between Charlie's shooter and his furry BF were completely faked.

---

Faked by who did it turn out? Not the fact there was a furry BF correct.

---

By somebody in law enforcement.

Go read the texts. No 20 yr couple in america communicate like that. It was clearly manufactured and leaked.

---

Be careful of those kind of arguments (italics). Never found them as persuasive as other types. They presume a bit too much. Like the teacher assuming a 20 year old writing like an accomplished archeologist is plagiarizing rather than emulating --doesn't always follow. Will take another look, never did get into them.

---

Hey man. You do you and believe what the Feds leak about everything.

Seamaster said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Haleyscomet50 said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Haleyscomet50 said:

---

She was probably right about some things so someone fed her this to make her look even more crazy.. It's a common tactic. I don't think anyone would be here or listening to her podcast if they didn't release those fake text messages between Charlie's killer and his Trans boyfriend that sounded like a cop wrote them.

---

Lmao - please tell me what things she was "probably right" about.

---

She is right about the text messages between killer and boyfriend. She's also right that Charlie was moving away from his Israel stance. Even after numerous members of his organization denied it. Until someone released the text messages. Sure she is a crazy person but other people's lies give her a platform and a audience.

---

What is this in reference to?

---

How the leaked text messages allegedly between Charlie's shooter and his furry BF were completely faked.

---

Zero evidence of this, just speculation.

Tim Pool has discovered the Candace grift and how it works on stupid people:

Tim Pool rips into Candace Owens, calling her “evil.”

“Behind the scenes, everybody is pissed off because they’re like ‘I wish I was as evil as [Candace] where I could just lie to get the views.”

pic.twitter.com/mOv8F4YcZG

— Eyal Yakoby (@EYakoby) December 2, 2025

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Seamaster said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Haleyscomet50 said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Haleyscomet50 said:

---

She was probably right about some things so someone fed her this to make her look even more crazy.. It's a common tactic. I don't think anyone would be here or listening to her podcast if they didn't release those fake text messages between Charlie's killer and his Trans boyfriend that sounded like a cop wrote them.

---

Lmao - please tell me what things she was "probably right" about.

---

She is right about the text messages between killer and boyfriend. She's also right that Charlie was moving away from his Israel stance. Even after numerous members of his organization denied it. Until someone released the text messages. Sure she is a crazy person but other people's lies give her a platform and a audience.

---

What is this in reference to?

---

How the leaked text messages allegedly between Charlie's shooter and his furry BF were completely faked.

---

Zero evidence of this, just speculation.

---

Likely "faked" by the shooter and his boyfriend in order to provide cover for the boyfriend, rather than an actual conversation.

Not faked by the FBI, Mossad/Jews, Trump, Erika Kirk, TPUSA, Egypt, etc. etc. etc.; all of whom she has accused of killing CK.

Seamaster said:

---

titan said:

---

Seamaster said:

---

titan said:

---

Seamaster said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Haleyscomet50 said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Haleyscomet50 said:

---

She was probably right about some things so someone fed her this to make her look even more crazy.. It's a common tactic. I don't think anyone would be here or listening to her podcast if they didn't release those fake text messages between Charlie's killer and his Trans boyfriend that sounded like a cop wrote them.

---

Lmao - please tell me what things she was "probably right" about.

---

She is right about the text messages between killer and boyfriend. She's also right that Charlie was moving away from his Israel stance. Even after numerous members of his organization denied it. Until someone released the text messages. Sure she is a crazy person but other people's lies give her a platform and a audience.

---

What is this in reference to?

---

How the leaked text messages allegedly between Charlie's shooter and his furry BF were completely faked.

---

Faked by who did it turn out? Not the fact there was a furry BF correct.

---

By somebody in law enforcement.

Go read the texts. No 20 yr couple in america communicate like that. It was clearly manufactured and leaked.

---

Be careful of those kind of arguments (italics). Never found them as persuasive as other types. They presume a bit too much. Like the teacher assuming a 20 year old writing like an accomplished archeologist is plagiarizing rather than emulating --doesn't always follow. Will take another look, never did get into them.

---

Hey man. You do you and believe what the Feds leak about everything.

---

I certainly do not. Just don't care for arguments thats only basis is what a certain age wouldn't write. Too similar to "no one would just go do X". Those are not evidence, just hints of probability. All you are saying is the probability is they are faked, and am not disputing that unless see otherwise.

Rapier108 said:

---

AgLiving06 said:

---

She's getting destroyed in her claims about Macron's wife, so now trying to skirt the same laws by claiming "allegedly."

Seriously, her husband needs to step in and get her the help she needs. This isn't normal behavior, and something is clearly wrong with her.

---

Yep, and its obvious to everyone but her and those who will white knight for her and excuse all of her actions.

---

her husband is a very rich gay Englishman who wants to be famous and more rich.

he could care less what she is doing.

they literally knew each other for 17 days before deciding to get married.

Seamaster said:

---

titan said:

---

Seamaster said:

---

titan said:

---

Seamaster said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Haleyscomet50 said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Haleyscomet50 said:

---

She was probably right about some things so someone fed her this to make her look even more crazy.. It's a common tactic. I don't think anyone would be here or listening to her podcast if they didn't release those fake text messages between Charlie's killer and his Trans boyfriend that sounded like a cop wrote them.

---

Lmao - please tell me what things she was "probably right" about.

---

She is right about the text messages between killer and boyfriend. She's also right that Charlie was moving away from his Israel stance. Even after numerous members of his organization denied it. Until someone released the text messages. Sure she is a crazy person but other people's lies give her a platform and a audience.

---

What is this in reference to?

---

How the leaked text messages allegedly between Charlie's shooter and his furry BF were completely faked.

---

Faked by who did it turn out? Not the fact there was a furry BF correct.

---

By somebody in law enforcement.

Go read the texts. No 20 yr couple in america communicate like that. It was clearly manufactured and leaked.

---

Be careful of those kind of arguments (italics). Never found them as persuasive as other types. They presume a bit too much. Like the teacher assuming a 20 year old writing like an accomplished archeologist is plagiarizing rather than emulating --doesn't always follow. Will take another look, never did get into them.

---

Hey man. You do you and believe what the Feds leak about everything.

---

and when the JURY of 12 Utahns vote to convict Robinson as the murderer-

the Candace cultists will be back here stating there is some other 'grand conspiracy' where Macron paid off the Jury Foreman.

the great thing about being an idiot and gullible is one will believe anything the cult leader tells you.

LMCane said:

---

Seamaster said:

---

titan said:

---

Seamaster said:

---

titan said:

---

Seamaster said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Haleyscomet50 said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Haleyscomet50 said:

---

She was probably right about some things so someone fed her this to make her look even more crazy.. It's a common tactic. I don't think anyone would be here or listening to her podcast if they didn't release those fake text messages between Charlie's killer and his Trans boyfriend that sounded like a cop wrote them.

---

Lmao - please tell me what things she was "probably right" about.

---

She is right about the text messages between killer and boyfriend. She's also right that Charlie was moving away from his Israel stance. Even after numerous members of his organization denied it. Until someone released the text messages. Sure she is a crazy person but other people's lies give her a platform and a audience.

---

What is this in reference to?

---

How the leaked text messages allegedly between Charlie's shooter and his furry BF were completely faked.

---

Faked by who did it turn out? Not the fact there was a furry BF correct.

---

By somebody in law enforcement.

Go read the texts. No 20 yr couple in america communicate like that. It was clearly manufactured and leaked.

---

Be careful of those kind of arguments (italics). Never found them as persuasive as other types. They presume a bit too much. Like the teacher assuming a 20 year old writing like an accomplished archeologist is plagiarizing rather than emulating --doesn't always follow. Will take another look, never did get into them.

---

Hey man. You do you and believe what the Feds leak about everything.

---

and when the JURY of 12 Utahns vote to convict Robinson as the murderer-

the Candace cultists will be back here stating there is some other 'grand conspiracy' where Macron paid off the Jury Foreman.

the great thing about being an idiot and gullible is one will believe anything the cult leader tells you.

---

I haven't made up my mind about Kirk and what exactly happened there.

But I do have brain cells and I don't believe everything that's curated and "leaked" for me to see like a good normie neocon.

Do you?

For example, do you believe Epstein killed himself?

The crazy/hot scale is undefeated!

Quote:

---

Hey man. You do you and believe what the Feds leak about everything.

---

The typical garbage strawman.

No one here, especially Titan believes everything the government tell us.

You believe a certified lying nutbag. You claim you don't trust people that lie to you, yet here you are lapping up everything Candace Owens says.

Im Gipper said:

---

Quote:

---

Hey man. You do you and believe what the Feds leak about everything.

---

The typical garbage strawman.

No one here, especially Titan believes everything the government tell us.

You believe a certified lying nutbag. You claim you don't trust people that lie to you, yet here you are lapping up everything Candace Owens says.

---

I haven't lapped up "everything" Candace Owens says."

I said above as much.

I think she's proven pretty conclusively that Macron's wife is a dude.

I think she is well within her rights to ask questions about the official story on how her friend and former business partner was publicly executed.

She's at least pursuing her truth and asking questions as opposed to the types that just say whatever they're told to say.

Seamaster said:

---

Im Gipper said:

---

Quote:

---

Hey man. You do you and believe what the Feds leak about everything.

---

The typical garbage strawman.

No one here, especially Titan believes everything the government tell us.

You believe a certified lying nutbag. You claim you don't trust people that lie to you, yet here you are lapping up everything Candace Owens says.

---

I haven't lapped up "everything" Candace Owens says."

I said above as much.

I think she's proven pretty conclusively that Macron's wife is a dude.

I think she is well within her rights to ask questions about the official story on how her friend and former business partner was publicly executed.

She's at least pursuing her truth and asking questions as opposed to the types that just say whatever they're told to say.

---

lol. She definitely hasn't come close to proving anything and the Macron's may bankrupt her entire business (and hopefully others who operate with this model) by proving she solely operates on spreading knowingly false bull**** to make money.

https://fortune.com/2025/12/02/candace-owens-brigitte-macron-lawsuit/

Just because you want something to be true doesn't make it true.

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Seamaster said:

---

Im Gipper said:

---

Quote:

---

Hey man. You do you and believe what the Feds leak about everything.

---

The typical garbage strawman.

No one here, especially Titan believes everything the government tell us.

You believe a certified lying nutbag. You claim you don't trust people that lie to you, yet here you are lapping up everything Candace Owens says.

---

I haven't lapped up "everything" Candace Owens says."

I said above as much.

I think she's proven pretty conclusively that Macron's wife is a dude.

I think she is well within her rights to ask questions about the official story on how her friend and former business partner was publicly executed.

She's at least pursuing her truth and asking questions as opposed to the types that just say whatever they're told to say.

---

lol. She definitely hasn't come close to proving anything and the Macron's may bankrupt her entire business (and hopefully others who operate with this model) by proving she solely operates on spreading knowingly false bull**** to make money.

https://fortune.com/2025/12/02/candace-owens-brigitte-macron-lawsuit/

Just because you want something to be true doesn't make it true.

---

So, that's not an argument.

I don't "want" it to be true. I believe it to be true based on the evidence.

Seamaster said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Seamaster said:

---

Im Gipper said:

---

Quote:

---

Hey man. You do you and believe what the Feds leak about everything.

---

The typical garbage strawman.

No one here, especially Titan believes everything the government tell us.

You believe a certified lying nutbag. You claim you don't trust people that lie to you, yet here you are lapping up everything Candace Owens says.

---

I haven't lapped up "everything" Candace Owens says."

I said above as much.

I think she's proven pretty conclusively that Macron's wife is a dude.

I think she is well within her rights to ask questions about the official story on how her friend and former business partner was publicly executed.

She's at least pursuing her truth and asking questions as opposed to the types that just say whatever they're told to say.

---

lol. She definitely hasn't come close to proving anything and the Macron's may bankrupt her entire business (and hopefully others who operate with this model) by proving she solely operates on spreading knowingly false bull**** to make money.

https://fortune.com/2025/12/02/candace-owens-brigitte-macron-lawsuit/

Just because you want something to be true doesn't make it true.

---

So, that's not an argument.

I don't "want" it to be true. I believe it to be true based on the evidence.

---

What "evidence"? When Candace loses the lawsuit (or more likely settles because she's well aware she's full of ****) will you then just shift to some other conspiracy because obviously "they" got to her?